RunRyder RC
WATCH
 2 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2     NEXT    >> ] 897 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs
01-20-2016 12:02 AM  31 months agoPost 1
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton's emails on her unsecured, homebrew server contained intelligence from the U.S. government's most secretive and highly classified programs, according to an unclassified letter from a top inspector general to senior lawmakers.

Fox News exclusively obtained the unclassified letter, sent Jan. 14 from Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III. It laid out the findings of a recent comprehensive review by intelligence agencies that identified "several dozen" additional classified emails -- including specific intelligence known as "special access programs" (SAP).

That indicates a level of classification beyond even “top secret,” the label previously given to two emails found on her server, and brings even more scrutiny to the presidential candidate’s handling of the government’s closely held secrets.

More here:

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...d-programs.html

The plot thickens.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 04:29 AM  31 months agoPost 2
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Yes, Hillary Clinton broke the law
Since there has been much evasion and obfuscation about Hillary Rodham Clinton’s email use, it seems appropriate to step back and simply review what we know in light of the law. It’s also instructive to compare Clinton’s situation to arguably the most famous case of our time related to the improper handling of classified materials, namely, the case of Gen. David Petraeus.

Instead of turning his journals — so-called “black books” — over to the Defense Department or CIA when he left either of those organizations, Petraeus kept them at his home — an unsecure location — and provided them to his paramour/biographer, Paula Broadwell, at another private residence. (None of the classified information in the black books was used in his biography.)

On April 23, Petraeus pled guilty to a single misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or materials under 18 USC §1924. Many in the intelligence community were outraged at the perceived “slap on the wrist” he received, at a time when the Justice Department was seeking very strong penalties against lesser officials for leaks to the media.

According to the law, there are five elements that must be met for a violation of the statute, and they can all be found in section (a) of the statute: “(1) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, (2) by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, (3) knowingly removes such documents or materials (4) without authority and (5) with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location [shall be guilty of this offense].”

The Petraeus case meets those conditions. Does Clinton’s?

Clinton originally denied that any of her emails contained classified information, but soon abandoned that claim. So far, 150 emails containing classified information have been identified on her server, including two that included information determined to be Top Secret.

She then fell back on the claim that none of the emails in question was “marked classified” at the time she was dealing with them. The marking is not what makes the material classified; it’s the nature of the information itself. As secretary of state, Clinton knew this, and in fact she would have been re-briefed annually on this point as a condition of maintaining her clearance to access classified information.

Then there’s location. Clinton knowingly set up her email system to route 100 percent of her emails to and through her unsecured server (including keeping copies stored on the server). She knowingly removed such documents and materials from authorized locations (her authorized devices and secure government networks) to an unauthorized location (her server).

Two examples demonstrate this point.

When Clinton would draft an email based on classified information, she was drafting that email on an authorized Blackberry, iPad or computer. But when she hit “send,” that email was knowingly routed to her unsecured server — an unauthorized location — for both storage and transfer.

Additionally, when Clinton moved the server to Platte River Networks (a private company) in June 2013, and then again when she transferred the contents of the server to her private lawyers in 2014, the classified materials were in each instance again removed to another unsecured location.

Next we have the lack of proper authority to move or hold classified information somewhere, i.e., the “unauthorized location.”

While it’s possible for a private residence to be an “authorized” location, and it’s also possible for non-government servers and networks to be “authorized” to house and transfer classified materials, there are specific and stringent requirements to achieve such status. Simply being secretary of state didn’t allow Clinton to authorize herself to deviate from the requirements of retaining and transmitting classified documents, materials and information.

There is no known evidence that her arrangement to use the private email server in her home was undertaken with proper authority.

Finally, there’s the intent to “retain” the classified documents or materials at an unauthorized location.

The very purpose of Clinton’s server was to intentionally retain documents and materials — all emails and attachments — on the server in her house, including classified materials.

The intent required is only to undertake the action, i.e., to retain the classified documents and materials in the unauthorized fashion addressed in this statute. That’s it.

It borders on inconceivable that Clinton didn’t know that the emails she received, and more obviously, the emails that she created, stored and sent with the server, would contain classified information.

Simply put, Mrs. Clinton is already in just as bad — or worse — of a legal situation than Petraeus faced.

http://nypost.com/2015/09/27/yes-hi...-broke-the-law/

Yep, she's guilty.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 04:41 AM  31 months agoPost 3
Aaron29

rrProfessor

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

And will be president.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 05:09 AM  31 months agoPost 4
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Aaron29
And will be president.
If we knew the backroom dealings of Obama and his DOJ, we could answer that right away.

Is Obama ready to let the dogs out or will he stifle her prosecution? Does Obama have a mystery candidate in the wings?

Sounds as if the FBI have the goods on her, but we don't know what Obama is doing behind closed doors.

Oh the deals they must be cutting right now.

Obama has not endorsed Hillary or helped her campaign.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 05:13 AM  31 months agoPost 5
Aaron29

rrProfessor

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

No matter what, she won't see a day in prison. He'd pardon her.

I'm just trying to ease you into reality so you aren't shocked when this crap comes.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 05:13 AM  31 months agoPost 6
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The Obummer will very likely pardon the Hildabeast.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 05:33 AM  31 months agoPost 7
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Aaron29
I'm just trying to ease you into reality so you aren't shocked when this crap comes.
Me and Mr. Reality ain't on speaking terms. I live in a right wing world here in the sticks of Central Texas.

I pretty well cling to my guns and a nice stash of ammo assuming I'll never have to fire a shot. Three more large orders of ammo will entitle me membership in NATO.

I figure there's a chance Hillary will escape the wrath of the hangman, but my crazy right wingness will tell me this was allowed to happen for a reason. It's kinda like the damage Obama has done to Democrat party. Yes he's damaged it, but maybe Hillary is the one to finish it off. Who knows?

Now is when we need a leak from the White House. Doesn't anybody snoop any more? How 'bout just listening at the keyholes? Doesn't a cook or janitor hear something? Jeez, people we need information out here.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 04:38 PM  31 months agoPost 8
GyroFreak

rrProfessor

Orlando Florida ...28N 81W

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I pretty well cling to my guns and a nice stash of ammo assuming I'll never have to fire a shot. Three more large orders of ammo will entitle me membership in NATO.
Same here

I think about the hereafter. I go somewhere to get something, then wonder what I'm here after ?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 04:57 PM  31 months agoPost 9
DoubleBass

rrNovice

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

If Hillary's able to navigate through this, just imagine the favors she's going to owe. A vote cast for her is just begging for corruption.

America is in big trouble with the current field of candidates.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 07:01 PM  31 months agoPost 10
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

DoubleBass
If Hillary's able to navigate through this, just imagine the favors she's going to owe. A vote cast for her is just begging for corruption.
On the one hand, Obama can allow his DOJ to go after her and be able to claim he's not obstructing justice.

And then he can pardon her claiming he did this in the best interest of the country. An ugly trial involving Hillary would upset a lot of the leftist freaks.

And then Hillary owes him big time and the Clinton foundation would have to funnel big bucks (before the pardon) to Obama.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 07:07 PM  31 months agoPost 11
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

When the sh#t hits the fan, he WILL pardon her.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 07:22 PM  31 months agoPost 12
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Dennis
When the sh#t hits the fan, he WILL pardon her.
I believe he will have to pardon her even before a trial. The leftist freaks would crucify him if he didn't.

Remember the pardon Nixon got?

But he will have to wait until the FBI finishes otherwise he might pardon her for 27 crimes and the FBI find 6 more crimes after he leaves office.

Of course if she wins the election, she will abuse the executive privilege. The country could not stand another Clinton impeachment plus the Rhinos don't have the guts.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 08:29 PM  31 months agoPost 13
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Nixon was pardoned by Ford after Nixon left office.

Big difference. Huge difference.

Not even the same issue.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 09:14 PM  31 months agoPost 14
nitro fun

rrApprentice

Oc ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Hillary will never go to jail, she leaves that snail trail as she slithers around, everyone behind her slides and slips away

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-20-2016 09:40 PM  31 months agoPost 15
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Dennis
Nixon was pardoned by Ford after Nixon left office.
Big difference. Huge difference.
Not even the same issue.
True, but the reasoning for the pardon was "the best interest of the country." Agree of not, that's what Ford said.

I think Obama will claim that same reason. It's wrong, but I think he will do that.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-21-2016 02:05 AM  31 months agoPost 16
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Hillary Clinton’s private email server was housed at the same physical location and on the same network as an email server used and operated by the Clinton Foundation, Breitbart News has exclusively learned.

Web archives show that the Presidentclinton.com Web address was being operated by the Clinton Foundation as of 2009, when Hillary Clinton registered her own clintonemail.com server.

Numerous Clinton Foundation employees used the presidentclinton.com server for their own email addresses, which means that they were using email accounts that, if hacked, would have given any hacker complete access to Hillary Clinton’s State Department emails, as well.

Hillary’s clintonemail.com server and the Foundation-run presidentclinton.com email server have exactly the same IP address, and the same SSL certificate (which an organization purchases for an email server to verify its trustworthiness).

mail.clintonemail.com and mail.presidentclinton.com both have an IP address of 64.94.172.146, according to an SSL Certificate Checker.

The two servers both have that same IP address, 64.94.172.146, according to DNS records. (Here are records for Hillary’s server, and here are records for Bill’s server).

Both servers have the same IP address, according to another independent Internet records database, robtex.net.

President Clinton’s server was created in 2002, while Hillary’s was created in 2009, which means that Hillary’s server was simply added to Bill’s Foundation-run server network.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...ton-foundation/

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-21-2016 02:59 AM  31 months agoPost 17
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

She kept saying b there's no evidence so maybe
There's no evidence, if this not the case why
She still free?
I see others high profile people get locked up for
A friction of what she did.

I guess justice don't caught up in this world with the rich and the famous the golden rule doesn't apply if they are luxurious.)) Escobar

Hillary Clinton on Wednesday brushed off a report that her private email server contained classified intelligence from some of the U.S. intelligence community's most secretive programs.

The former secretary of state told National Public Radio that the report was a "leak" designed to harm her in the presidential race despite offering no evidence. And a spokesman for the Democratic presidential front-runner went so far as to publicly accuse investigators looking into her server as conspiring with Republican senators to embarrass her.

"As the State Department has confirmed, I never sent or received any material marked classified, and that hasn't changed in all of these months," she said. "This, seems to me, to be, you know, another effort to inject this into the campaign. It's another leak."

She also called an inspector general's letter a "continuation of an inter-agency dispute that has been going on now for some months."

Clinton was referring to a letter sent by Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III to leaders on congressional intelligence committees last week detailing the findings from a review of Clinton's emails, a spokeswoman for the inspector general confirmed to CNN.

Two government agencies flagged emails on Clinton's server as containing classified information, the inspector general said, including some on "special access programs," which are a subset of the highest "Top Secret" level of classification, but are under subject to more stringent control rules than even other Top Secret information."

Clinton's spokesman, Brian Fallon, told Bloomberg that the campaign believes McCullough and Republican senators worked together to make sure the report would become public.

"It is suspect from the beginning that the intelligence community inspector general is continuing to reveal materials and surface allegations while the Justice Department review is going on," Fallon told Bloomberg. "It's completely fair to suspect that the intelligence community inspector general is not operating in good faith."

Fallon also appeared on CNN Wednesday morning to dispute the report. He argued on "New Day" that the information described as "classified" may be no more than a news article that was forwarded, although he ceded it is not entirely clear what classified material the report mentions.

Fallon argued that the crux of the issue is a dispute between the State Department and the intelligence community over what should be classified. He said the emails were not classified in the eyes of the State Department when they were sent to Clinton. Fallon also implied the inspector general has an ax to grind with Clinton.

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-21-2016 01:00 PM  31 months agoPost 18
fla heli boy

rrKey Veteran

cape coral, florida

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

On the one hand, Obama can allow his DOJ to go after her and be able to claim he's not obstructing justice.
And then he can pardon her claiming he did this in the best interest of the country. An ugly trial involving Hillary would upset a lot of the leftist freaks.
It's all in the timing. I don't think there would be time to try her and convict her before he's out of office. If the FBI actually indicts her, I think she'll be toast.
That being said, I don't think she'll serve a day behind bars, even if convicted. The NEXT POTUS will pardon her, regardless of who it is.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-21-2016 02:14 PM  31 months agoPost 19
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I could be wrong. But, I don't think Trump would pardon her.

That's why the Obummer will likely pardon her before he leaves office. Very likely on his last day depending on the status of the FBI investigation (indictments) and the polls.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-21-2016 07:02 PM  31 months agoPost 20
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Dennis
I could be wrong. But, I don't think Trump would pardon her.
That's why the Obummer will likely pardon her before he leaves office. Very likely on his last day depending on the status of the FBI investigation (indictments) and the polls.
If Trump "pardoned" her - his supporters would be very upset with him.

If Obama "didn't pardon" her - his supporters would be very upset with him.

She wins the election - she gets away scott free.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 2 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2     NEXT    >> ] 897 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Inspector General: Clinton emails had intel from most secretive, classified programs
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 6  Topic Subscribe

Friday, August 17 - 2:30 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online