RunRyder RC
WATCH
 4 pages [ <<    <     2      3     ( 4 )    >    >> ] 1928 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Is "Scientific Theory" Fact? - Of course not
03-12-2014 03:55 AM  4 years agoPost 61
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I tried to get TLE to understand this too and he never made it out of the gate either...
Don't let the gate hit you in the butt on the way out.

.....................Yawn

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 03:58 AM  4 years agoPost 62
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The Gift was acknowelged - A UBER DEEP Discussion but not for here
acknowledged : Essentially - To Follow: OBEDIENCE or NOT

FREE MORAL AGENCY : Follow or Not " Free Agency "

GOD Will Intentionally just step out of the WAY " Let them Destruct "

Walking By Faith is Obedience : The Gift TOO or Not

Gift of FREE MORAL AGENCY

Look at the Train Wreck's of people Lives or How deep their Weed's are

He However has Never left - Just step's aside : Let EM - Un Faithful

Let the Ignorant be Ignorant = No Humor intended

Never Once have you ever walked alone : Just never Obeyed

No Science in the Soul of Man's Heart :
A special Place that has No definition

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 04:14 AM  4 years agoPost 63
unclejane

rrElite Veteran

santa fe, NM, USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Don't let the gate hit you in the butt on the way out.
.....................Yawn
Well you I never expected to understand what Hog and Dusty were talking about at all. That was for their information so they didn't have to bang their heads against the wall.

LS

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 04:40 AM  4 years agoPost 64
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

These old geezers are lame lol.

2+2=4 in our world. In theirs it is like 43/54=-d=e=3

They wont be with us in a few years. Their kind will soon pass, we will have to suffer them.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 04:50 AM  4 years agoPost 65
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Well you I never expected to understand what Hog and Dusty were talking about at all. That was for their information so they didn't have to bang their heads against the wall.
If you had the brains to let them speak for themselves, it would have more impact.

I guess your brains are quite limited.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 04:54 AM  4 years agoPost 66
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Not only can we do the talk we DO The Walk

If we where from the left -- which we are NOT : We would use a word which we know we should not :

But if we Could it would be the Word or two :

Lil MORON

But we Know we Should Not ;

Muggles come from Moronicalville

Not to far from FerHoodelville sure Not

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 05:11 AM  4 years agoPost 67
nitro fun

rrApprentice

Oc ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

It's a good thing we evolved, so I don't have too lick my a$$ to clean it...

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 11:40 AM  4 years agoPost 68
Thomas L Erb

rrKey Veteran

Alliance ohio

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

"Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth?" Gal. 4:16

30
Scientists Admit: Evolution Not Supported By Facts!

Issue Date: January/February 1987
"Evolutionism is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless," says Professor Louis Bouroune, former President of the Biological Society of Strasbourg and Director of the Strasbourg Zoological Museum, later Director of Research at the French National Centre of Scientific Research, as quoted in The Advocate, March 8, 1984.

On many campuses, any professor who admits having doubts about the "factual" nature of evolution would be laughed off the campus (and out of his job). But today, more and more courageous scientists are publicly admitting what they have known privately for years: believing in evolution requires an act of blind faith.

Does evolution square with the facts? Here are the statements of several scientific leaders as found in The Quote Book, published by Creation Science Foundation Ltd.

Evolutionists Great Con Men

"Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution we do not have one iota of fact." (Dr. T.N. Tahmisian. Atomic Energy Commission, The Fresno Bee, August 20, 1959.

"...most people assume that fossils provide a very important part of the general argument made in favor of Darwinian interpretation of the history of life. Unfortunately, this is not strictly true." (Dr. David Raup, Curator, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago. Quoted from "Conflicts between Darwin and paleontology," Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin, Vol. 50 (1), 1979.)

Do Fossils Prove It?

"...I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct illustration of evolutionary transition in my book. If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them...Yet Gould and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they say there are no transitional fossils...I will lay it on the line--there is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument." (Personal letter from Dr. Colin Patterson, Senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History in London, to L. Sunderland.)

"Despite the bright promise that paleontology provides a means of ‘seeing' evolution, it has presented some nasty difficulties for evolutionists, the most notorious of which is the presence of ‘gaps' in the fossil record. Evolution requires intermediate forms between species and paleontology does not provide them..." (David B. Kitts, Ph.D. -- Zoology, Head Curator, Department of Geology, Stoval Museum, and well-known evolutionary paleontologist. Evolution, Vol. 28, Sept. 1974.

But What About Those Bones?

"...not being a paleontologist, I don't want to pour too much scorn on paleontologists, but if you were to spend your life picking up bones and finding little fragments of head and little fragments of jaw, there's a very strong desire to exaggerate the importance of those fragments..." (Dr. Greg Kirby in an address given at a meeting of the Biology Teachers Association of South Australia in 1976. Dr. Kirby was the Senior Lecturer in Population Biology at Flinders University and was giving the case for evolution.)

"A five million year old piece of bone that was thought to be the collarbone of a humanlike creature is actually part of a dolphin rib...The problem with a lot of anthropologists is that they want so much to find a hominid that any scrap of bone becomes a hominid bone." (Dr. Tim White, anthropologist, University of California, Berkeley, quoted in New Scientist, April 28, 1983.

But the World Is So Old...Isn't It?

"All the above (radiometric) methods for dating the age of the earth, its various strata, and its fossils are questionable, because the rates are likely to have fluctuated widely over earth history...It is obvious that radiometric techniques may not be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to be. Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric methods are often quite different (sometimes by hundreds of millions of years). There is no absolutely reliable long-term radiological ‘clock.' The uncertainties inherent in radiometric dating are disturbing to geologist and evolutionists..." (W.D. Stansfield, Ph.D., Instructor of Biology, California Polytech State University, The Science of Evolution, Macmillan, 1987.

Carbon-14 Will Tell Us...Won't It?

"When the blood of a seal, freshly killed at McMurdo Sound in the Antarctic was tested by carbon-14, it showed the seal had died 1,300 years ago." (From W. Dort Jr., Ph.D. -- Geology, Professor, University of Kansas, quoted in Antarctic Journal of the United States, 1971.

"The hair on the Chekurovka mammoth was found to have a carbon-14 age of 26,000 years but the peaty soil in which is was preserved was found to have a carbon-14 dating of only 5,600 years." (Radiocarbon Journal, Vol. 8, 1966.)

When Did Dinosaurs Really Live?

The existence of dinosaurs long before man came along has been almost a basic tenet of faith for the evolutionist. But what if the footprints of both man and dinosaur were found together?

In the Journal of Geological Education, Vol. 31, 1983, David H Milne and Steven D Schafersman tell us "Such an occurrence, if verified, would seriously disrupt conventional interpretations of biological and geological history and would support the doctrine of creationism and catastrophism."

Well gentlemen, not only have both man and dinosaur prints been found together in Mexico, New Mexico, Arizona, Missouri, Kentucky and Illinois, but other U.S. locations as well.

You cannot legalize morality. It's internal not external. You either have it or you don't.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 12:07 PM  4 years agoPost 69
helicopter

rrApprentice

Omaha, Nebraska

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Tom, that was great. Good Find, however you are retarded
in thinking the earth didn't create itself out of nothing
over billions of years by that wonderful fact of science:
chance.

You are stupid and old in your stance upon some dusty
goat herders handbook being a guide to living right.

You are stuck in your ways and need to understand that
you actually are wrong in your biblical interpretation
and need a 'blind faith' jump to believe in self creation.

I hope you don't die without coming to the proper conclusion
that upon death - there remains no longer any hope for
your soul. There is no resurrection and no consciousness
when your brain stops 'thinking'.

You are a fluke of the evolutionary universe, born
for a moment, only to be GONE forever. Gosh in 10 years
no one will remember you anyway. So party on dude! (Opps
I meant tard.)

I love gravity, it always keeps my feet planted when I fly!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 01:48 PM  4 years agoPost 70
Hoggy42

rrNovice

Australia

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

This message goes out to everyone on this thread.

Dennis started a thread in which we all had the chance to talk about scientific definitions. I understand where his motive for this was. However there was no need at all to turn this into another pro/anti religion thread we have enough!

We could have stayed away from evolution to get the point across. We didn't need to discuss God at all.

And to those faithful ones you didn't need to go into a fear of knowledge tailspin and start spurting bull$hit. You guys want to continue to be dumb and are happy to watch your country's great achievements flushed away by morons that believe humans and dinosaurs lived together. Don't say you weren't warned.

Dennis

I did have a nice proper response for you and some more questions but I've lost interest. So I'm going to leave it at this.
Look, I am not a scientist.
But, I suppose Gravity could be considered scientific law. But, don't quote me on that.
The great thing is you don't need to be a scientist to understand scientific evidence.

You should look up the difference between a scientific law and a scientific theory. I was going to do it for you.

And of course
As far as flight. Well, it happens
Your dam right SCIENCE WORKS

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 01:50 PM  4 years agoPost 71
Hoggy42

rrNovice

Australia

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Thomas watch this it address at least some of the things in your long list of bull$hit. Just to let you know every single thing you have posted attacking science has been debunked over and over again.

Watch at YouTube

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 04:18 PM  4 years agoPost 72
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Sound's Like a Talking Toy with a Seared Conscience :
Eating Bread with Impure hands and still don't get the bondage - The False Teachers of Empty Vain Philosophy.

Like the TOY that started the Evolution Thread ---and then disappeared and skipped out to vanish or hide - NO Personal Position of his Own Topic or Reason - No Personal Position - Typical Little Mind - POOF gone into Vapor and Smoke

Becoming enamored with the traditions of man - sift and destruction thru a a distorted view and acceptance. Purveyor of False Teaching and Exit. Fail's too recognize every good thing

No Sense of direction but to influence - POOF " What is IT "

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 05:32 PM  4 years agoPost 73
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

When Did Dinosaurs Really Live?
There is no question.

If you dont know it is because your retarded and cant read

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 05:34 PM  4 years agoPost 74
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Do Fossils Prove It?
No they do not.

They are the weakest evidence.

And even that weak evdience creationist cannot overcome.

Creationist also cannot explain the fossils and why out of billions, not one single example is out of place.

Tards

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 05:58 PM  4 years agoPost 75
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Why Capt Kirk and Spock and Scottie come back in TIME in Their Space Machine

Because the WHALES where HERE !st : It's in the BOOK Take a LOOK

To Get Em a WHALE !!! She's Pregnant Too !!!

Science and The Book !

As Scottie Would Say :

CApt. ! Their Be a Whale On Board !!!!

We got us a WHALE to take BACK HOME

or to go back Forward in Time
.

Spock would say :

Lil Outy is a Flail-er Capt : A Walking Sckizum of Disobedience
Like a TOY Phereingie has got them Big Ear's but Never learned too Listen with em. NO FOCUS - Scattered

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
03-12-2014 06:27 PM  4 years agoPost 76
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Yes we know the old geezers here cannot have a rational debate with reason.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 4 pages [ <<    <     2      3     ( 4 )    >    >> ] 1928 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Is "Scientific Theory" Fact? - Of course not
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 3  Topic Subscribe

Saturday, August 18 - 9:41 pm - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online