RunRyder RC
WATCH
 2 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2     NEXT    >> ] 1472 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › General Wesley Clark - USA to take out 7 countries in 5 years!
05-30-2013 10:28 PM  5 years agoPost 1
InvertedDude

rrVeteran

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

This was reported some years ago, never really paid attention to it until now!

Libya - Removed
Iraq - Removed
Somalia in progress
Sudan in progress
Syria in progress
Lebanon in progress
Iran being set up

http://www.globalresearch.ca/we-re-...sudan-iran/5166

Nothing happens by accident!

So, We are the ones starting WW3 soon or it is under way as we speak. Good JOB AMERICA! This is what happens when you let dummies control our country!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 04:26 AM  5 years agoPost 2
fla heli boy

rrKey Veteran

cape coral, florida

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

And there's not a single reason to be involved in any of the above. Let 'em kill each other off. They're pretty good at it.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 11:28 AM  5 years agoPost 3
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

And there's not a single reason to be involved in any of the above.
Then why do you think we are involved?
Let 'em kill each other off. They're pretty good at it.
Yet none of these countries, excepting Iraq, have actually started any wars with any other country. And the Iraqi invasion of Iran was carried out with western support.

You can always expect ''insurgents,'' ''rebels'' and ''terrorists'' in these countries, for as long as the US writes their constitutions for them. This is why Lebanon has always had a Christian president since the 1980s, despite being a majority Muslim country. While the Lebanese government remains in place today, Hezbollah obviously weren't part of the plan.

The new Afghan constitution is the Taliban's main bone of contention, as they insist it was ''imposed from the outside,'' and they want a hand in re-writing it.

As for ''spreading democracy'':
In a discussion of contemporary British foreign policy, Mark Curtis stated that "Polyarchy is generally what British leaders mean when they speak of promoting 'democracy' abroad. This is a system in which a small group actually rules and mass participation is confined to choosing leaders in elections managed by competing elites."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyarchy
What do all these countries have in common? They were all either directly colonised by western imperial powers (mostly Britain), and/or governed by western installed puppet rulers.

Presumably the reason why Britain had an empire, is the same reason as to why we are involved in these countries today.

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 11:35 AM  5 years agoPost 4
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Watch at YouTube

The top comment from the youtube page in the link in the OP:
You must be as tired as me of conservative supporters arguing with democrat supporters as though it matters who is the president.
Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 11:37 AM  5 years agoPost 5
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Good JOB AMERICA! This is what happens when you let dummies control our country!

Watch at YouTube

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 11:39 AM  5 years agoPost 6
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

General Wesley Clark,a telling interview from a man in the thick of it,great post.

Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 11:48 AM  5 years agoPost 7
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Absolutely!

Apparently General Clark ran for President in 2004, but, surprise, surprise, was misrepresented and ridiculed by MSM - just as Ron Paul was.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley...ential_campaign

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 11:53 AM  5 years agoPost 8
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Great posts Dusty,Clark said that in 2007,no denying he was right then.Proves the other guy right too,different leaders,same policies

Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 11:57 AM  5 years agoPost 9
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Clark and Paul appear to be on the same ship in many ways,shame so many were brainwashed by the media machine to make them almost invisible or cranks.

Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 12:27 PM  5 years agoPost 10
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Seemingly he wrote a book about it which was published in 2003.
General Clark's Book on Modern Wars

In Clark's book, Winning Modern Wars, published in 2003, he describes his conversation with a military officer in the Pentagon shortly after 9/11 regarding a plan to attack seven Middle Eastern countries in five years: "As I went back through the Pentagon in November 2001, one of the senior military staff officers had time for a chat. Yes, we were still on track for going against Iraq, he said. But there was more. This was being discussed as part of a five-year campaign plan, he said, and there were a total of seven countries, beginning with Iraq, then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Iran, Somalia and Sudan."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley..._on_Modern_Wars
Here's a talk from 2007 where he says they couldn't wait to get out of Iraq so they could make a start on Syria. He also recounts a conversation with Paul Wolfowitz from the 1990s, after the demise of the USSR, about how they had a limited amount of time to make the middle east under US control before the next superpower came along to challenge them.

Watch at YouTube

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 01:05 PM  5 years agoPost 11
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The ''Wolfowitz Doctrine'' before it was ''rewritten'':
The doctrine announces the U.S’s status as the world’s only remaining superpower following the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War and proclaims its main objective to be retaining that status.

"Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power."
The doctrine establishes the U.S’s leadership role within the new world order.

"The U.S. must show the leadership necessary to establish and protect a new order that holds the promise of convincing potential competitors that they need not aspire to a greater role or pursue a more aggressive posture to protect their legitimate interests. In non-defense areas, we must account sufficiently for the interests of the advanced industrial nations to discourage them from challenging our leadership or seeking to overturn the established political and economic order. We must maintain the mechanism for deterring potential competitors from even aspiring to a larger regional or global role."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfowitz_Doctrine

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 01:18 PM  5 years agoPost 12
fla heli boy

rrKey Veteran

cape coral, florida

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

that was exactly my point Dusty. They haven't invaded anyone. Leave 'em alone. Yeah, some of them poke Israel once in a while, but Israel is quite capable of handling their own affairs.
I can't even imagine how ticked off I'd be if one of my kids ended up in a box over these sheepf**ckers.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 02:08 PM  5 years agoPost 13
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Send each individual home : From each and every corner and location.

No matter what the circumstance / position /or material value don't let the paper prevent it.

Then they will learn Humility: Maybe why they kill each other - or the innocent -- for what ever reason they deem necessary.

The Value of Liberty, Freedom, Independence, and Democracy -They cannot steal it. Because you can not -It must be earned.
From every country -all of them.

GO HARD CORE INDEPENDENCE - Stop the Theft of the above - They will figure it out -Send them home to solve their own problem's.

We had 911/ Fort Hood/ Boston and too many others to list - then the pilfering of intellectual property or technology. Cyber Theft, the Industrial base and Economics's.

Their is No SUCH Thing as a WAR on Terror- That's politically correct to hide what they have done

When they are finished - see if they wish too purchase some thing -

(Maybe) : When they can be trusted - when they are done slaughtering each other or learn Humility

Like a paper clip, a bar of soap or a box of cereal or a light bulb. Just keep it over their - till it's done.

It will not stop.

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 02:47 PM  5 years agoPost 14
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Agree grey send all the western forces home till our governments learn to stop stealing assets from poorer and less well armed countries.

Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 03:29 PM  5 years agoPost 15
fla heli boy

rrKey Veteran

cape coral, florida

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

c'mon man. If we were actually stealing their oil, I MIGHT be OK with it...
We're not stealing anything. We're sending our kids into a meatgrinder and after we head home with our tail between our legs, we rebuild the country only to end up with them hating us anyway.
We shouldn't have rebuilt Europe or Japan after WWII either.
If we're going to make war on somebody, do it 100% and leave them pulverized to the point where they can't make war on anybody for decades.
I still say, that's what our B2's are for.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 04:21 PM  5 years agoPost 16
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I agree with the Generals view as to why we are there fla.

Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 05:19 PM  5 years agoPost 17
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Well if you believe in Ponies and Pixies that's cool :

Just bug out - send them home and see if they can do it - On Their Own

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2013 05:30 PM  5 years agoPost 18
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Ponies and Pixies grey? Thats your domain

Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-01-2013 01:27 AM  5 years agoPost 19
Noobyflyer

rrVeteran

Clearwater, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

OOH Dusty.....we get involved to take all the oil, then pay $4.29 for regular and refuse pipeline building to starve ourselves.

tip- point your foil hat towards mecca for better reception

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-01-2013 01:35 AM  5 years agoPost 20
sjgusmc21

rrApprentice

San Antonio, Texas

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Jesus...why don't we all just hug a tree and sing Coom By Ya by a stink'n camp fire....stealing....

'FACE PALM FROM HELL'

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 2 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2     NEXT    >> ] 1472 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › General Wesley Clark - USA to take out 7 countries in 5 years!
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 5  Topic Subscribe

Monday, August 20 - 7:57 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online