RunRyder RC
WATCH
 1 page 362 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › NY Times exposes Obama over false compensation for black, Hispanic, female and Native Am farmers
04-26-2013 06:53 PM  5 years agoPost 1
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

In the winter of 2010, after a decade of defending the government against bias claims by Hispanic and female farmers, Justice Department lawyers seemed to have victory within their grasp.

Ever since the Clinton administration agreed in 1999 to make $50,000 payments to thousands of black farmers, the Hispanics and women had been clamoring in courtrooms and in Congress for the same deal. They argued, as the African-Americans had, that biased federal loan officers had systematically thwarted their attempts to borrow money to farm.

But a succession of courts — and finally the Supreme Court — had rebuffed their pleas. Instead of an army of potential claimants, the government faced just 91 plaintiffs. Those cases, the government lawyers figured, could be dispatched at limited cost.

They were wrong.

On the heels of the Supreme Court’s ruling, interviews and records show, the Obama administration’s political appointees at the Justice and Agriculture Departments engineered a stunning turnabout: they committed $1.33 billion to compensate not just the 91 plaintiffs but thousands of Hispanic and female farmers who had never claimed bias in court.

The deal, several current and former government officials said, was fashioned in White House meetings despite the vehement objections — until now undisclosed — of career lawyers and agency officials who had argued that there was no credible evidence of widespread discrimination. What is more, some protested, the template for the deal — the $50,000 payouts to black farmers — had proved a magnet for fraud.

The compensation effort sprang from a desire to redress what the government and a federal judge agreed was a painful legacy of bias against African-Americans by the Agriculture Department. But an examination by The New York Times shows that it became a runaway train, driven by racial politics, pressure from influential members of Congress and law firms that stand to gain more than $130 million in fees. In the past five years, it has grown to encompass a second group of African-Americans as well as Hispanic, female and Native American farmers. In all, more than 90,000 people have filed claims. The total cost could top $4.4 billion.

As a senator, Barack Obama supported expanding compensation for black farmers, and then as president he pressed for $1.15 billion to pay those new claims. Other groups quickly escalated their demands for similar treatment. In a letter to the White House in September 2009, Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey, a leading Hispanic Democrat, threatened to mount a campaign “outside the Beltway” if Hispanic farmers were not compensated.

Much, much more here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/u...s.html?hp&_r=1&
I tried to cut the article down, but there's just too much meat on this bone. Kudos to the NEW YORK TIMES for exposing Obama and his thieving ways.

Obama: doing everything he can to rob the American taxpayer

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 362 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › NY Times exposes Obama over false compensation for black, Hispanic, female and Native Am farmers
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 1  Topic Subscribe

Tuesday, August 21 - 9:09 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online