RunRyder RC
WATCH
 1 page 378 views POST REPLY
Home🌌Off TopicsOff Topics News & Politics › Skyscraper Engulfed By Fire, Does Not Collapse
04-04-2013 01:03 PM  6 years ago
Topic Vote0Post 1
albatross

rrApprentice

Texas, Houston area

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Skyscraper Engulfed By Fire, Does Not Collapse
Building refuses to conform to post-9/11 understanding of physics

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
April 4, 2013

The new understanding of physics since September 11, 2001, that limited fire damage can cause buildings to implode at almost free fall speed into their own footprints, was confounded once again as a 40-storey skyscraper in Chechnya was engulfed with flames for hours yet did not collapse.

Watch at YouTube

The blaze consumed an apartment building in Grozny, the Chechen capital yesterday evening before it was eventually put out in the early hours of Thursday morning. Fires burned on every single floor of the structure apart from the ground floor.

“According to the emergencies service, the blaze has damaged an area of more than 14,000 square meters. It has completely destroyed the plastic trimming used on the building’s exterior, but the interior remained untouched,” reports RIA Novosti.

The building is the tallest structure in the region outside of Moscow, standing at 145-meters (475-foot). No one was injured or killed in the blaze but dozens had to be evacuated.

Although officials expressed concern at one point that the building could collapse, its core structure was not affected by the huge fire.

Compare the skyscraper in Grozny to the similar-sized WTC Building 7 on 9/11, which was not hit by a plane, suffered comparably limited fire damage, and yet collapsed almost into its own footprint at near free fall speed.

Following 9/11, scientists agreed that instead of accepting the premise that some form of explosives must have been used to bring down WTC 7, physics itself must be wrong and that normal fires can burn hot enough to weaken steel cores, despite the fact that they were barely hot enough to break the vast majority of windows in Building 7.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was forced to invent a “new phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” to explain to collapse of WTC 7, labeling it “the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building” in history.

The collapse of Building 7 was so highly anticipated that it was reported before it happened by several news stations, including BBC and CNN. Firefighters, police and first responders were all told to get back from the building because it was about to be brought down.

The Grozny skyscraper is just the latest example of a building refuse to conform to our new post-9/11 understanding of physics, following the example of a similar sized building in Beijing which was also consumed by fire in 2009 but remained standing.

Watch at YouTube

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

This article was posted: Thursday, April 4, 2013 at 5:56 am
...my handle backwards is how I feel about current world affairs...
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 378 views POST REPLY
Home🌌Off TopicsOff Topics News & Politics › Skyscraper Engulfed By Fire, Does Not Collapse
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 0  Topic Subscribe

Wednesday, July 17 - 8:24 am - Copyright © 2000-2019 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online