RunRyder RC
WATCH
 1 page 371 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › WA state AWB Provision - Home Inspections
02-19-2013 04:09 AM  5 years agoPost 1
hams

rrApprentice

Ohio

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I am truly at a loss for words on this one. Home searches...

The article also points out that the man who introduced the bill did not know that the provision was even in it!!!!!!!!!WTF

http://seattletimes.com/html/localn...tneat17xml.html
Misstep in gun bill could defeat the effort

One of the major gun-control efforts in Olympia this session calls for the sheriff to inspect the homes of assault-weapon owners. The bill’s backers say that was a mistake.

By Danny Westneat

Seattle Times staff columnist
Most Popular Comments
Hide / Show comments
So these guys in the legislature sign bill without reading them? How irresponsible... (February 16, 2013, by ail) MORE
Perfectly reasonable gun-control is not something that the Democrats are capable of... (February 16, 2013, by Alaskabobc) MORE
Please tell me, Gestapo, what exactly is an "assault-weapon"? (February 16, 2013, by Soarer) MORE
Read all 930 comments
Post a comment

advertising

Forget police drones flying over your house. How about police coming inside, once a year, to have a look around?

As Orwellian as that sounds, it isn’t hypothetical. The notion of police home inspections was introduced in a bill last week in Olympia.

That it’s part of one of the major gun-control efforts pains me. It seemed in recent weeks lawmakers might be headed toward some common-sense regulation of gun sales. But then last week they went too far. By mistake, they claim. But still too far.

“They always say, we’ll never go house to house to take your guns away. But then you see this, and you have to wonder.”

That’s no gun-rights absolutist talking, but Lance Palmer, a Seattle trial lawyer and self-described liberal who brought the troubling Senate Bill 5737 to my attention. It’s the long-awaited assault-weapons ban, introduced last week by three Seattle Democrats.

Responding to the Newtown school massacre, the bill would ban the sale of semi-automatic weapons that use detachable ammunition magazines. Clips that contain more than 10 rounds would be illegal.

But then, with respect to the thousands of weapons like that already owned by Washington residents, the bill says this:

“In order to continue to possess an assault weapon that was legally possessed on the effective date of this section, the person possessing shall ... safely and securely store the assault weapon. The sheriff of the county may, no more than once per year, conduct an inspection to ensure compliance with this subsection.”

In other words, come into homes without a warrant to poke around. Failure to comply could get you up to a year in jail.

“I’m a liberal Democrat — I’ve voted for only one Republican in my life,” Palmer told me. “But now I understand why my right-wing opponents worry about having to fight a government takeover.”

He added: “It’s exactly this sort of thing that drives people into the arms of the NRA.”

I have been blasting the NRA for its paranoia in the gun-control debate. But Palmer is right — you can’t fully blame them, when cops going door-to-door shows up in legislation.

I spoke to two of the sponsors. One, Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a lawyer who typically is hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues, said he did not know the bill authorized police searches because he had not read it closely before signing on.

“I made a mistake,” Kline said. “I frankly should have vetted this more closely.”

That lawmakers sponsor bills they haven’t read is common. Still, it’s disappointing on one of this political magnitude. Not counting a long table, it’s only an eight-page bill.

The prime sponsor, Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, also condemned the search provision in his own bill, after I asked him about it. He said Palmer is right that it’s probably unconstitutional.

“I have to admit that shouldn’t be in there,” Murray said.

He said he came to realize that an assault-weapons ban has little chance of passing this year anyway. So he put in this bill more as “a general statement, as a guiding light of where we need to go.” Without sweating all the details.

Later, a Senate Democratic spokesman blamed unnamed staff and said a new bill will be introduced.

Murray had alluded at a gun-control rally in January that progress on guns could take years.

“We will only win if we reach out and continue to change the hearts and minds of Washingtonians,” Murray said. “We can attack them, or start a dialogue.”

Good plan, very bad start. What’s worse, the case for the perfectly reasonable gun-control bills in Olympia just got tougher.

Danny Westneat’s column appears Wednesday and Sunday. Reach him at 206-464-2086 or dwestneat@seattletimes.com

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
02-19-2013 04:41 AM  5 years agoPost 2
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

All this gun control crap is really quite entertaining.

Its exposing the left for their ignorance, intolerance, and just plain blatant stupidity.

If it continues like this unabated, we could very easily see some changes coming in 2014 in our legislative bodies.

Maybe.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
02-19-2013 04:48 AM  5 years agoPost 3
hams

rrApprentice

Ohio

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

One can hope, but I am not sure. I was almost certain we would be bitching about Romney now, instead of Obummer still.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
02-19-2013 05:10 AM  5 years agoPost 4
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

One can hope, but I am not sure. I was almost certain we would be bitching about Romney now, instead of Obummer still.
Thats true. But, that was a different deal.

If its not, then America is no longer America.

The Constitution is very clear on infringement.

All these silly cases will have to go to SCOTUS. No doubt they will.

As long as SCOTUS remains the way it is, then most all of these gun bans will be null and void.

SCOTUS has already ruled on this crap time and time and time again:

https://rc.runryder.com/t726078p1/

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 371 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › WA state AWB Provision - Home Inspections
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 1  Topic Subscribe

Thursday, July 19 - 8:38 pm - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online