RunRyder RC
WATCH
 1 page 741 views POST REPLY
Home🌌Off TopicsOff Topics News & Politics › Wyoming Bill Would Nullify Obama Gun Control, Jail Feds
01-12-2013 07:33 PM  7 years ago
Topic Vote0Post 1
albatross

rrApprentice

Texas, Houston area

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Wyoming Bill Would Nullify Obama Gun Control, Jail Feds
Alex Newman
New American
Jan 12, 2013

As the Obama administration plots various assaults on gun rights by “executive order” and legislation, proposals described as “very extreme” even by some Democrats, state lawmakers in Wyoming have another idea. Republican legislators are rallying behind nullification legislation that would void unconstitutional infringements on the right to keep and bear arms, even providing prison time for any federal agents who may try to enforce Washington, D.C., gun control in the state. Lawmakers expect it to pass.

The new bill, H.B. 0104 or the “Firearms Protection Act,” would nullify any new federal infringements on the constitutionally protected gun rights of state residents — who enjoy some of the lowest crime rates while being among the most heavily armed people in America. Unconstitutional federal gun registration schemes, as well as restrictions on semi-automatic guns or standard-capacity magazines, would also be nullified under the legislation.

There are teeth in the proposed law too: Any federal official attempting to enforce unconstitutional statutes or decrees infringing on gun rights passed after January 1 of this year would be charged with a felony. If convicted, criminal officials would be punished by up to five years in state prison and a $5,000 fine. The legislation also authorizes the state attorney general to defend citizens of Wyoming if federal authorities seek prosecutions under unconstitutional gun control rules.

At least eight state representatives and two state senators have already sponsored the legislation. And nationwide, support for similar measures is exploding. “We want to get things ahead of the game,” Republican state Rep. Kendell Kroeker, the primary sponsor of the bill, told the Huffington Post. “We take the Second Amendment seriously in Wyoming…. If the federal government is going to pass laws taking back our rights, it is our right as a state to defend those rights.”

Citing his oath to support and defend the U.S. and state constitutions, state Rep. Kroeker has been a leader in standing against lawless usurpations of power by the federal government. In a previous session, he introduced legislation to increase the use of gold as currency in the state, for example. “I take an oath to uphold, support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of Wyoming,” Kroeker continued, telling reporters that his constituents and activists nationwide were thrilled by the move. “I believe it is my duty to take that oath seriously.”

In a separate interview with the Associated Press, the liberty-minded lawmaker noted that there are “a lot of people” who would seek to take all of Americans’ guns — at least if they could. The only thing restraining them, Kroeker said, is public opposition as well as other lawmakers who take their oaths seriously and are concerned about protecting the people’s unalienable rights.

“We’re a sovereign state with our own constitutional form of government,” he told the AP. “We’ve got a right to make our laws, and if the federal government is going to try to enforce unconstitutional laws on our people and take away the rights of Wyoming citizens, then we as a state are going to step up and make that a crime.”

In the state Senate, another co-sponsor of the legislation, Wyoming State Senator Larry Hicks, cited the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which reserves all powers not specifically granted to the federal government to the states or the people. The nullification bill, he added in an interview with the Washington Examiner, will send a message to federal politicians considering further infringements on the rights of his constituents.

“It says that your one size fits all solution doesn’t comport to what a vast majority of the state believes,” Sen. Hicks told the paper about the message federal politicians should be taking from the legislation, telling other reporters that state lawmakers were receiving e-mails in support of the bill from all across America and that citizens were urging their own states to take similar action. “I don’t think this is controversial in Wyoming at all…. I fully expect this bill to pass.”

According to the liberty-minded state senator, even if Congress refuses to budge, the administration is determined to restrict gun ownership by presidential decree. “I think that’s the biggest threat we’re facing,” he told the AP. Sen. Hicks also said that his constituents were “absolutely terrified” about threats from Washington to assault gun rights — especially Vice President Joe Biden’s pledge this week to implement the lawless attack by executive order.

“They are very, very upset that we’re going to see some level of federal takeover of our weapons and abuse of our rights given to us by the Second Amendment,” the state senator was quoted as saying, referring to his constituents. “Also, that the federal government will bypass our legislative officials and confiscate our weapons through executive order. This gives citizens of the Western United States a great deal of concern.”

The AP, in an uncharacteristically honest assessment, pointed out that Wyoming has one of the highest rates of per-capita gun ownership in America, and that it also has among the lowest levels of gun violence. “Part of it’s our culture,” Hicks explained. “Our kids grow up around firearms, and they also grow up hunting, and they know what the consequences are of taking a life. And they know at an early age, whether you hunt or fish, that there’s consequences from pulling that trigger. We’re not insulated from the real world in Wyoming.”

At least one Democrat, Rep. James Byrd, has already expressed his opposition to the plan. “If you want to pick a fight with the feds, let’s pick a fight with the feds that’s about something that means something,” he was quoted as saying by the AP while claiming to be a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. It was not immediately clear why Byrd thought the unalienable right to keep and bear arms — enshrined in both the Wyoming and U.S. constitutions — was not meaningful.

Predictably, Obama apparatchiks funded by billionaire statist George Soros are already crying foul, too. The far-left “Think Progress” blog, for example, claimed that nullification would be unconstitutional. “The constitution actually stipulates that federal law ‘shall be the supreme law of the land,’” Annie-Rose Strasser alleged falsely, without pointing out the constitutional stipulation that federal laws must be “made in pursuance” with the Constitution. It was not clear whether the writer was simply ignorant of American history and the U.S. Constitution, or whether the false statements were deliberate lies in an effort to confuse readers.

Some analysts quoted in the establishment press, also presumably unfamiliar with history or the U.S. Constitution, have claimed that states may not nullify unconstitutional federal usurpations as well. Of course, American history is replete with examples of nullification — Wisconsin nullified a federal statute purporting to require the return of escaped slaves to their masters, for example. Even Founding Fathers like Thomas Jefferson helped states void unconstitutional legislation in the early years of the Republic.

More recently, states all across America have been putting their foot down. Even causes traditionally associated with liberals, such as marijuana legalization, have succeeded through nullification — Colorado and Washington state both legalized the controversial plant in November, and many other states have approved it for medical use in spite of unconstitutional federal statutes. Conservatives and libertarians have also been relying on nullification, especially in recent years.

As the increasingly out-of-control federal government tries to restrict more and more of Americans’ unalienable rights — with the Second Amendment just the latest target — state lawmakers all across the country are taking action. A bill just introduced in Indiana known as the Firearm Freedom Act, for instance, would also protect the rights of gun owners to be free from federal regulations if the gun was produced and purchased in the state. Similar legislation has already been adopted in other states.

Meanwhile, law-enforcement officials, such as sheriffs and police chiefs, are also developing legal strategies to protect gun rights in their jurisdictions, with some lobbying for nullification measures as well. As The New American reported this week, while the Obama administration seeks to severely infringe on the Second Amendment, talk of mass resistance nationwide is growing in tandem. The president may believe he can violate the Constitution by decree, but it appears that many states have had just about enough of the lawlessness. If Congress refuses to rein in the out-of-control administration, state governments may have to do it instead.
...my handle backwards is how I feel about current world affairs...
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-12-2013 08:23 PM  7 years ago
R Hudson

rrKey Veteran

Denver, CO

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Way to go, Wyoming!Signature
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 01:18 AM  7 years ago
r.s.m.

rrApprentice

Greenville SC

MyPosts All Forum Topic
YES...someone is showing some backbone 2 chronicles 7-14 "We the People"
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 07:31 AM  7 years ago
fla heli boy

rrElite Veteran

cape coral, florida

MyPosts All Forum Topic
the last vestiges of Americanism......Wyoming, the Dakotas, Idaho. It's almost worth dealing with the weather....
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 06:27 PM  7 years ago
daggit

rrElite Veteran

Claremont, MN

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I like this. A State standing against Federal tyranny! I hope more do it
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 06:28 PM  7 years ago
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

MyPosts All Forum Topic

We are going to enforce the REAL I.D> Law's -
greyeagle
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 06:33 PM  7 years ago
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

MyPosts All Forum Topic
There are only 2 ways to help preserve our freedoms and liberties:

1) States rights
2) The American people themselves
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 10:52 PM  7 years ago
Hivoltage

rrApprentice

Ohio

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Great for them!I Dont Have No Stink'in Signature
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 11:28 PM  7 years ago
Noobyflyer

rrVeteran

Clearwater, FL

MyPosts All Forum Topic
My, my. Gonna be an interesting next 4 years.

Not only are they saying "No", they're saying "Hell No!"

Me like.

Just because "people" in Chicago can't control themsevles or take on the responsibility of gun ownership, does not mean people in Wyoming should lose their rights.

Take notes Obama and Bloomberg. I can't stand Bloomberg. Frog faced nancy.
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 11:49 PM  7 years ago
fla heli boy

rrElite Veteran

cape coral, florida

MyPosts All Forum Topic
he's right up there with Pelosi, Reid and Obama for sure.
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-13-2013 11:52 PM  7 years ago
jbjones

rrVeteran

Columbus, Mississippi

MyPosts All Forum Topic
💎Sustaining Member
The new bill, H.B. 0104 or the “Firearms Protection Act,” would nullify any new federal infringements on the constitutionally protected gun rights of state residents
Perhaps I'm just some backwoods-Mississippi-dumbass, but I don't think this is going to work out the way they (and we) want it to. Ya see, Federal law trumps State law. Well, minus the California marijuana thing (but, hey that's different right?)

I hope this holds up. And I hope my state (and others) do something similar. I just 'aint going to be surprised when it is challenged by our favorite civil liberties group and drug through several decades of court hearings, while the Federal law is implemented.

-JB
J. B. Jones
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-14-2013 01:52 AM  7 years ago
RM3

rrElite Veteran

Killeen, Texas - USA

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Ya see, Federal law trumps State law
yes it does...but only if there is some one there to enforce it...

ever see a Fed drive into Chicagos worst hood and "try" to enforce Fed firearm laws...

you would have a better chance of sneeking a sandwich across Ethiopia.
showing a preference will only get you into trouble, 90% of everything is crap...
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
01-14-2013 02:21 AM  7 years ago
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

MyPosts All Forum Topic
What if it is ALL a distraction ???
Fast and Furious

Benghazi Gate

Prior to the election

the Flurry of EO.s more pending

The Up coming rise in the Ceiling debt cap

No Budget : Not to Be

What is the Other hand doing ???

A platinum Trillion dollar coin ??

Member of the Muslim Brother hood - coming to AMERICA to request Aid

add to the List ???
greyeagle
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-14-2013 02:29 AM  7 years ago
jbjones

rrVeteran

Columbus, Mississippi

MyPosts All Forum Topic
💎Sustaining Member
yes it does...but only if there is some one there to enforce it...
Yeah, but there are still folk that are going to know it's illegal and just not do it for fear of "what if". That is deterrent enough to some folk.

Don't get me wrong, I'm against all kinds of laws that restrict our freedoms. I just think if a state passes a law that contradicts Federal law* then that state (and its citizens) will lose.

-JB

*except California, where the Federal Gov't refuses to enforce its own laws and lets the state ignore it at its leisure; Does not apply to any other state.
J. B. Jones
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-14-2013 02:58 AM  7 years ago
drdot

rrElite Veteran

So. California, Orange County.

MyPosts All Forum Topic
fwiw...

With a 14% approval rating, our congress is irrelevant....More and more people will begin to follow Jacksons' dictum..."Let them enforce it......"

molon labe, baby...

BC
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-14-2013 03:16 AM  7 years ago
jbjones

rrVeteran

Columbus, Mississippi

MyPosts All Forum Topic
💎Sustaining Member
molon labe, baby...
Indeed!

-JB
J. B. Jones
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-16-2013 12:01 AM  7 years ago
albatross

rrApprentice

Texas, Houston area

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Guns and Texas
Becky Akers
lewrockwell.com
January 15, 2013

One of Texas’ proud sons, William Martin, sent me this heartening article about Rep. Steve Toth, a state legislator there who “says he’s trying to make sure the federal government doesn’t take away our gun rights. … Toth wants to make any new federal weapons ban illegal in the state of Texas.”

Yeehaw! Looks as if I’m gonna have to move to Texas — even the way the mainstream there reports the news (“make sure the federal government doesn’t take away our gun rights“) is a vast and refreshing improvement over the East Coast. You’d never catch the nincompoops at the New York Times admitting that we have any “gun rights,” let alone that the Feds hope to rob us of them rather than “protect” us. And catch these additional quotes from Steve, which again would never have survived the editor’s red pencil at the Slimes: “This is a hardened state. This isn’t a good place for a criminal to show up and start shooting. … We want to make sure this legislation protects the Second Amendment gun rights and the Tenth Amendment which is state sovereignty rights of Texans.” Whoa!

Which brings us to the extension of more kudos to the Tenth Amendment Center. Whether they have actively worked with Steve Toth, or whether nullification simply permeates the air now thanks to their efforts, liberty may yet revive!

Mr. Martin also forwarded this story about “Texas Republican [U.S.] Rep. Steve Stockman threaten[ing] Monday afternoon that he would file articles of impeachment against President Barack Obama if he institutes gun control measures with an executive order. Stockman warned that such executive orders would be ‘unconstitutional’ and ‘infringe on our constitutionally-protected right to keep and bear arms.’ ‘I will seek to thwart this action by any means necessary, including but not limited to eliminating funding for implementation, defunding the White House, and even filing articles of impeachment,’ Stockman said in a statement.” “Defunding the White House”!!!!!! Oh, don’t you love that?!!!!! It’s so magnificent I’ll even pretend Stockman is sincere rather than posturing! And “filing articles of impeachment”!!!! You go, guy! Double whoa! And another yeehaw, too!
...my handle backwards is how I feel about current world affairs...
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 741 views POST REPLY
Home🌌Off TopicsOff Topics News & Politics › Wyoming Bill Would Nullify Obama Gun Control, Jail Feds
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 3  Topic Subscribe

Saturday, April 4 - 3:11 am - Copyright © 2000-2020 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online