RunRyder RC
 2  Topic Subscribe
WATCH
 1 page 383 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Voters love a “DIRTY” fight
08-11-2012 11:17 PM  5 years agoPost 1
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Voters love a “DIRTY” fight

August 11, 2012 by Onan Coca

What do you want to see in advertising from our Presidential candidates? Do you want a clean set of advertisements simply listing the candidates positions on certain issues? Would you prefer a dirtier affair where the viewer is reminded of all of the nasty little skeletons in someone’s closet? Or perhaps something in between, highlighting candidates differences and reminding voters that the other candidate may not be morally, ethically, or otherwise capable of being our President?

I genuinely believe that most voters think they want the “clean” fight. People are tired of the wantonly destructive way that candidates often speak of each other, and they want politicians who devoutly believe in being the “good guy” on the stage. Not stooping to the low blow attacks of the ethically challenged opponent and the political operators who handle these campaigns. But it’s a load of horse manure. If this were really the case, then why would campaigns continue to trot out the drivel that we see election after election?

Most recently one of President Obama’s Super PACs developed an ad that seemed to imply that because of Mitt Romney’s business practices at Bain Capital… a woman died of cancer. The ad has backfired in a tremendous way, but only because it was proven to be filled with half-truths and misinformation. If the ad had been accurate, and Romney had still been running Bain, and the family really had no health insurance, and the woman did die of cancer because of the loss of said insurance… this could have been a KO for the Romney campaign. The ad is dirty and frivolous whether or not it’s true, but if it had been true that would not have mattered, the American public would have eaten it up and Romney would be forever painted as some kind of murdering capitalist vampire. Romney just got lucky that he wasn’t at Bain anymore, and the family did have insurance after the husband lost his job. Otherwise this ad may have rung in another 4 years of Obama.

We need to face the reality that we live in a culture that values the grotesque and the dirty. Millions of Americans may say they despise the mud-slinging but these are the same people who tune in to TMZ, or read the National Enquirer, or surf the many celebrity gossip sites on the web. Negative advertising is the best way for a candidate to sway voters, whether or not they like to admit it. It is vitally important that Romney find the soft underbelly of the Obama campaign and hit it with as much negative advertising as he can. If you are waiting for a “clean” political fight then you better get comfortable you are going to be waiting a very long time.

http://patriotupdate.com/articles/v...e-a-dirty-fight

My Comments: A dirty fight we are going to get.

Bring It On.

Make My Day.

Lets Roll.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
08-12-2012 07:24 PM  5 years agoPost 2
fla heli boy

rrKey Veteran

cape coral, florida

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I've only seen one or two positive ads from Romney. I've yet to see a single positive ad from Obama. Not even making a weak attempt to be civil.....and it's gonna get much worse.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 383 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Voters love a “DIRTY” fight
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 2  Topic Subscribe

Monday, June 18 - 8:50 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online