RunRyder RC
WATCH
 7 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2      3     NEXT    >> ] 3973 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Court says "Defense of Marriage Act" Unconstitutional
05-31-2012 06:35 PM  6 years agoPost 1
flustercluck

rrVeteran

Newnan Ga (Just S. of ATL)

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

http://mobile.bloomberg.com/news/20...1-?category=%2F

Of course it is. This is in keeping with Barry's embrace of homosexual marriage.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-31-2012 10:46 PM  6 years agoPost 2
helicopter

rrApprentice

Omaha, Nebraska

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Great Fluster.
The libtards again in their misguided effort to make any
kind of discrimination wrong, have left the basic fact that
society is based on family. God gave this to us. One man
becoming ONE with his Wife.

This activity is impossible to achieve in any other
configuration.

God calls it wrong.

We ourselves are continuing to destroy that which God
has given us. We will lose in the end.

I puke when I see men on tv lip-locking. It literally makes
me sick.

However, I do not FEEL the same when women kiss but in reality
it injures the very heart of our Creator. I am not HIM.

The reality is this: Abstinence.

Before Marriage. A virgin man with his virgin wife is God's Idea.

Two men, no marriage, no coitus (if you will.) No anal activity.

We have lost our American Vision of WHAT IS RIGHT and PROPER.

This is the reason so many on the God Thread say there is no God!

WE LEFT HIM!

He didn't leave us. (But hides His Face from Sin because
And ever so simply: He Is Holy.)

But the cool thing about God is that He is also loving.

He will forgive Repentant Sinners.

This is Good News.

I love gravity, it always keeps my feet planted when I fly!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-01-2012 12:11 AM  6 years agoPost 3
flustercluck

rrVeteran

Newnan Ga (Just S. of ATL)

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

One man becoming ONE with his Wife.
Helicopter, you meant "One man becoming ONE with his boyfriend(s)", right??

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 04:21 PM  6 years agoPost 4
PsychoZ

rrApprentice

Northern, CA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Good, it is unconstitutional.

Tea Parties are for little girls with imaginary friends

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 04:29 PM  6 years agoPost 5
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

PsychoZ
Good, it is unconstitutional.
Obama is making the "constitution" unconstitutional.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 06:04 PM  6 years agoPost 6
PsychoZ

rrApprentice

Northern, CA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

All men are created equal. At least that is what the Bill of Rights states.

They left out the part that if you are gay then you are not created equal and we can deny you the same rights as anyone else. Same way they did for the black and asians. We took away gun rights due to the hatred of others based on beliefs.

And I find it very funny that straight people accuse the gay crowd of pushing their beliefs on to others, when it is the straight crowd that has been denying them rights all along. Seems as the straight crowd has been pushing their beliefs on everyone much longer than the gay crowd. How many times do we hear that is not God's way, but is that not also pushing ones beliefs on others?

Tea Parties are for little girls with imaginary friends

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 06:24 PM  6 years agoPost 7
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

And I find it very funny that straight people accuse the gay crowd of pushing their beliefs on to others, when it is the straight crowd that has been denying them rights all along. Seems as the straight crowd has been pushing their beliefs on everyone much longer than the gay crowd. How many times do we hear that is not God's way, but is that not also pushing ones beliefs on others?
We live in a republic.

Whenever a lifestyle or belief gets in the way of the majority, that same majority has a right to vote it out of existence or deny certain rights of the majority. Any notion otherwise is to promote taking away the rights of the majority. You cannot have it both ways.

By far, the same black and asian people you mentioned do not want the definition of marriage to include gays.
All men are created equal. At least that is what the Bill of Rights states.
Correct. And, all men have a right to have the power of their vote upheld and not overturned by some radical local or federal judge.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 07:04 PM  6 years agoPost 8
PsychoZ

rrApprentice

Northern, CA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Whenever a lifestyle or belief gets in the way of the majority, that same majority has a right to vote it out of existence or deny certain rights of the majority. Any notion otherwise is to promote taking away the rights of the majority. You cannot have it both ways.
People should not be able to vote away others rights.

Allowing homosexuals to get married takes nothing away from "traditional" marriages. It only allows them the same rights. I know it is hard for some to understand, but allowing homosexuals to get married will not be taking away anyone's rights, but only providing rights to those that have been denied those based on another's beliefs.

Tea Parties are for little girls with imaginary friends

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 07:12 PM  6 years agoPost 9
BDIS

rrApprentice

Valdosta, Ga

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

IMHO this wouldn't be as much of an issue if they were not trying to change the definition of Marriage. If they would focus more on giving rights to "civil unions" they might not have as much of a problem.

Seems to me this is an argument over the legal BENEFITS of marriage, not marriage itself right?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 07:18 PM  6 years agoPost 10
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

God dont like sodomy he want them dead,
The people in hati have started this same unlcean act,
and they were ruff up with a terrible earthquake and score die

i can bet all those that die are the unclean. I am dam sure
men is not getting marry to man there any more, or people getting
there shadow taking away. NOw that god send them a message.
same thing will happen to us if we allow sodomy.

Remember last year a few state was to vote on the same sex marrage
and great earthquake shake part of the mid west and the east coast

at the time, never before there was earthquake in those place.

God hate homosexual.

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 07:38 PM  6 years agoPost 11
Castlebravo

rrNovice

Hillsboro,Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

We live in a republic.
Whenever a lifestyle or belief gets in the way of the majority, that same majority has a right to vote it out of existence or deny certain rights of the majority. Any notion otherwise is to promote taking away the rights of the majority. You cannot have it both ways.
By far, the same black and asian people you mentioned do not want the definition of marriage to include gays.
Correct. And, all men have a right to have the power of their vote upheld and not overturned by some radical local or federal judge.
Well...it doesnt quite work that way.....it's why we have a Constitution. You cant vote a law into place that is unconstitutional....no matter how many people vote for it. The only way you're going to get past that is to vote to change the Constitution itself. Federal Law will always preempt State or local law.

DOMA will not pass the constitutional test and will be defeated....and when this happens....I believe that all of the states that have passed amendments to outlaw gay marriage will have these laws found unconstitutional also.

I believe your statements that a majority of people are opposed to same sex marriage are inaccurate (I know you said Asian and black people above but you've produced the broader example in the past). What is accurate is that....right now...there is a slight majority of people that vote that feel this way.....and this is changing by the day. If you look at the demographics of who votes for the "anti-gay" amendments or against the "pro-gay" amendments, it is invariably the older generations....the generations that were indoctrinated by the church and religion. As these people start to go away (i.e."die off" ) and science continually disproves the fallacies of the bible.....this "majority" will change......

CB

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 08:05 PM  6 years agoPost 12
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

No to sodomy, NO to gays' marrage.
Well you all can stump and stump and stump and beat you all chest
to legalize sodomy.'i hope you all do the same when a 10.9 quake
shake this place or that rock that is about to colide with
the earth smash into biggest gay's city here,
the you will all know that the almighty god is not sleeping.

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 08:27 PM  6 years agoPost 13
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The Fire Storm is already Primed in the State of New Jersey
New Jersey all ready has a legal case being supported by Eric Holder and the Minion's of the Federal Justice Dept. In regard's to Same Sex Marriage

Case revolves around a legal {civil union}.

Please Note: Same Sex marriage is against the law in New Jersey.

Same sex marriage law doe's not exist. Yet a Civil Union doe's

One of the Male Partner's is a Illegal Immigrant --- Illegal - Undocumented. Not here with permission. a Non Citizen.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement want's to deport the Illegal Immigrant but has been stopped by the Federal Justice Dept : Holder ---

The Justice Dept is questioning the relationship as a marriage - to prevent the deportation of the non citizen.

Yet the law { Same sex Marriage ) has yet to exist and they are attempting to use it in a court of law ?????? .

OK so --------doe's a Civil Union to a GAY US citizen automatically give US citizen ship to the illegal GAY partner ???

Simple : If it is TRUE LOVE allow Both to leave to the home land of the illegal.

Holder is trying to apply a Federal law that doe's not yet exist

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 09:16 PM  6 years agoPost 14
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Well...it doesnt quite work that way.....it's why we have a Constitution. You cant vote a law into place that is unconstitutional....
Explain that to ObamaCare.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 09:19 PM  6 years agoPost 15
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

dam dennis it look like you are the sweetie
nice post.

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 09:39 PM  6 years agoPost 16
Castlebravo

rrNovice

Hillsboro,Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Explain that to ObamaCare.
If Obamacare is found to be unconstitutional....then that would certainly be analogous.

I like to think of Obamacare like my old drill instructor.....He wasn't prejudiced against anybody......he hated everybody......

But then again.....Obamacare really doesn't have any bearing on the discussion at hand.

CB

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 10:05 PM  6 years agoPost 17
a1saleen

rrApprentice

vancouver washington usa

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I wonder when gay couple's split up after being married
who will have to pay alimony AKA spousal support?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 10:08 PM  6 years agoPost 18
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Obamacare really doesn't have any bearing on the discussion at hand.
Not if you supported it the clandestine way, it was not in
the best interest of the people it was stuffed up the butt of american. so we are going react the same with the Same sex garbage,

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 10:12 PM  6 years agoPost 19
PsychoZ

rrApprentice

Northern, CA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Explain that to ObamaCare.
It is just like car insurance, you have to have it and if you don't you get fined. So why isn't everyone complaining about car insurance?

Tea Parties are for little girls with imaginary friends

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
06-04-2012 10:14 PM  6 years agoPost 20
Castlebravo

rrNovice

Hillsboro,Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I wonder when gay couple's split up after being married
who will have to pay alimony AKA spousal support?
In "traditional" marriage....there is nothing that says the "man" has to pay spousal support.....there are plenty of women who pay it. I may be ignorant to this fact but isn't it usually the party that made more money over the "life" of the marriage that has to pay?

By the way....spousal support is just another reason the government needs to get out of the marriage business.....it used to serve a purpose....but that purpose has transcended with both parties working now....

CB

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 7 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2      3     NEXT    >> ] 3973 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Court says "Defense of Marriage Act" Unconstitutional
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 9  Topic Subscribe

Wednesday, July 18 - 9:44 pm - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online