RunRyder RC
WATCH
 6 pages [ <<    <     1      2     ( 3 )     4      5     NEXT    >> ] 3457 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Obama-No-Show at Trial – Sworn testimony reveals fake Social Security number, other gaps
01-29-2012 02:34 AM  6 years agoPost 41
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The forefathers did not want immigrants coming over here and infiltrating themselves into this countries government.What Obama's father did is excactly what they did not want to happen.ITs pretty simple,what other reason would they say natural born citizen?
your who say!what dumb sh!T' they didn't want man from other country to come and screw american woman, really!! this is like saying they
dont want white woman to born black babies, do you your self think
something is wrong with that constitutation, tell you what your forefather must be very selfish to think of a world he doesn't own
to even think this way,

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 02:39 AM  6 years agoPost 42
Kramer

rrApprentice

LaPorte,In.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

they didn't want man from other country to come and screw american woman
No where does it say this.Once again you are making crap up and rambling on,making no sense

http://www.facebook.com/groups/1029857 http://northern-indiana-modelers-association.synthasite.com/

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 02:42 AM  6 years agoPost 43
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

your who say!what dumb sh!T' they didn't want man from other country to come and screw american woman, really!! this is like saying they
dont want white woman to born black babies, do you your self think
something is wrong with that constitutation, tell you what your forefather must be very selfish to think of a world he doesn't own
to even think this way,
Look it up,it is this countries forefather not mine Einstein,get used to it.

IF they didnt write that into the constitution anyone in the world could become a US President.Much like your home-boy Obama.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 02:43 AM  6 years agoPost 44
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Obama's father did is excactly what they did not want to happen.ITs pretty simple,what other reason would they say natural born citizen?
are you reading people post are you just yapping stop yapping and start reading.

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 02:45 AM  6 years agoPost 45
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

are you reading people post are you just yapping stop yapping and start reading.
These are my words.Stop your yapping and lieing Paul.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 02:06 PM  6 years agoPost 46
baby uh1

rrVeteran

St. James, Mo.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The facts are that by Constitutional law Obama doesn't qualify to run for President or hold the office.
He has already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he isn't qualified to do the job either!

Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 02:19 PM  6 years agoPost 47
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

A Message From One Of The Attorneys At Obama’s Eligibility Proceedings In Atlanta

January 28, 2012 By Breaking News

Fellow Constitutionalists,

One of my earliest childhood memories is of my parents talking about Nixon and the Watergate scandal. I remember the newspaper headline: “Nixon Resigns!” President Nixon’s fight against court subpoenas made international news. Yesterday President Obama completely ignored a court subpoena, and the world shrugged.

Obama’s behavior yesterday is even more disturbing than Nixon’s. Nixon at least respected the judicial branch enough to have his attorney’s show up in court and follow procedure. Nixon’s fight in the courts followed existing law. Nixon acknowledged the authority of the judicial branch even while he fought it. Obama, on the other hand, essentially said yesterday that the judicial branch has no power over him. He ordered his attorneys to stay away from the hearing. He didn’t petition a higher court in a legitimate attempt to stay the hearing. Instead he showed complete contempt for the entire judicial branch and for the rule of law. Rather than respecting the legal process Obama went around the courts and tried to put political pressure directly on the Georgia Secretary of State. When that failed, he simply ignored the judicial branch completely.

The rule of law, and our three-branch system of government, now hang in the balance. If the Georgia court issues a ruling on the merits and an order finding Obama in contempt of court, and if that contempt order actually results in real punishment of some kind, then we will still have a Constitutional Republic. If this doesn’t happen, then Obama will have been rewarded for showing complete contempt for the judicial branch.

Understand that the goal of the Georgia ballot challenge was to have a court rule on the merits of the Constitutional question: Does the term “natural born citizen” in Article II of the Constitution, require a Presidential candidate to have two parents that were U.S. citizens at the time the candidate was born? Obama wants to avoid having a court rule on this question. That is why he didn’t show up and ordered his attorneys to not show up. He was hoping that the Georgia court would enter a default judgment rather than rule on the merits. If the court enters a default judgment, Obama will have succeeded in avoiding the Constitutional eligibility question. He will then appeal the default judgment, get the appellate court to suspend the default judgment pending appeal, and then delay the appeal until after the primary. This is undoubtedly Obama’s plan.

If the Georgia Court rules that Supreme Court precedent must be followed and therefore Obama simply does not meet the minimum Constitutional requirements to hold the office of President, then we will at least have succeeded in finding one court in the nation willing to do its job. If that court finds Obama in contempt of court, then we still have three viable branches of government. The Georgia court has the authority to do both of these things. The world should be holding its breath.

Unfortunately the world is apparently unaware that a great Republic is on life support. The Roman Empire died a slow death. It’s death was so gradual that few people living at that time probably noticed the individual events that marked the death throes of that great empire. Apparently the same is true of America. Yesterday marked a stunning turn of events in the constant power struggle between the three branches of our government. Our President openly showed that he believes he is completely above the law. I wonder if the court even noticed its own death certificate. We will see in a few days.

I will certainly try to explain this to the court in our proposed findings of fact and law that the court requested we file before February 5th.

All of your encouragement and prayers have been greatly appreciated. They are needed even more over the next few weeks. This battle is FAR from over. And it has taken on importance beyond what we predicted (which is truly astounding). Please tell everyone you know about Obama’s contempt of the judicial branch. Please explain to them what it really means. Even those that agree with Obama politically and disagree with our ballot challenge should be shocked, appalled, and scared of Obama’s contempt for the judicial system.

Van Irion

Co-Founder, Lead Counsel

LIBERTY LEGAL FOUNDATION

http://www.westernjournalism.com/a-...ngs-in-atlanta/

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 02:42 PM  6 years agoPost 48
baby uh1

rrVeteran

St. James, Mo.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Obama has shown numerous times that he considers himself above the law of the common man. This is why he thinks that it's OK for him to accept gifts of houses, money and other considerations in trade for favors from his wealthy backers and why he has a Whitehouse full of tax cheats!
WE cannot afford to have the US government ran like the Chicago city hall!

Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 03:00 PM  6 years agoPost 49
Carey

rrVeteran

Allentown USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Anytime you want to look like a total mouthbreathing idiot, just say you are a TRUTHER or BIRTHER.

There are so many VALID reasons to hate OBUMMER.

You think that for one second the GOP would let HUSSEIN even make it to the inauguration if he didn't qualify?

Even BILL O'REILLY is saying 'GUYS STFU and find a real ISSUE'.

Watch at YouTube

Do you think O'REILLY would let OBUMMER get away with so much as leaving the toilet seat up??

Guys, stop looking like total tardballs on this one and find some real concrete issues. (THERE ARE PLENTY!!)

This is why we look like complete idiots to the segment of the US that knows that the SUN is a STAR.

Yes the ones that can read the freaking rulebook like O'REILLY.

I can't find it anywhere in the rules that the parent has to be the father to make a US NBC status.

Let's talk about the actual failures (THERE ARE PLENTY!!)

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 03:22 PM  6 years agoPost 50
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Let's talk about the actual failures (THERE ARE PLENTY!!)
Thats true and I would agree with you.

But, once the states start taking this up as an eligibility issue to put the Obummer on their ballots, than its a court issue in each state. Its no longer just birther nonsense.

I am not sure if the Obummer can stop that. I am sure there is some legal dancing around he can do. Not sure what that is. But, once a state rules that he cannot be on a ballot because of eligibility issues, he cannot be accepted as a write in either.

So far, there is about 5 states that are taking this eligibility issue up in their courts. It could easily snowball into other states if Georgia rules against the prez and his eligibility. All it would take is one major state with a lot of electoral votes to do that and there is no way the Obummer can win.

We'll have to see what happens. There are legitimate issues and a lot of unanswered questions. The last I heard, the state of Georgia decision will come out on either Feb 4th or 6th.

Its definatley something that could get quite interesting and even quite entertaining.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 04:29 PM  6 years agoPost 51
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The forefathers did not want immigrants coming over here and infiltrating themselves into this countries government.What Obama's father did is excactly what they did not want to happen.ITs pretty
simple,what other reason would they say natural born citizen?
[B]your who say!what dumb sh!T' they didn't want man from other country to come and screw american woman, really!! this is like saying they
dont want white woman to born black babies, do you your self think
something is wrong with that constitutation, tell you what your forefather must be very selfish to think of a world he doesn't own
to even think this way,

where does the constitutation say the president mother and father have to be american?????? i am still wating.

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 04:46 PM  6 years agoPost 52
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

where does the constitutation say the president mother and father have to be american?????? i am still wating.
Actually, it doesn't define "Natural Born".

Its very much a grey area that needs to be defined by the Supreme Court.

Your pal the Obummer just might force the issue.

Make my day.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 05:05 PM  6 years agoPost 53
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Actually, it doesn't define "Natural Born".
Thank you the truth will set you free, not it time for this birther stuff to go away. YOU all can't beat the american born president by vote so you all want to change the constitution to say he's not eliligible, you deserve a slap on you cheak, how many week it take you to tell the truth, left wing win again.

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 05:06 PM  6 years agoPost 54
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Actually, it doesn't define "Natural Born".

Its very much a grey area that needs to be defined by the Supreme Court.
It was quite obvious that if they had a situation like the one that exist with Obama they would have spelled it out better.They assumed back then that it was a given how Natural Born Citizen was defined.
What happened with Obama was exactly what they DID NOT want to happen and its taken this long for someone to break through the constitution.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 05:10 PM  6 years agoPost 55
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

winnetka california

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Shut the fact up' you're eating your own word too.
!!!!!!!OBAMA FOR LIFE!!!!!!

I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 05:12 PM  6 years agoPost 56
Heliosprime

rrApprentice

NY,

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Why you guys waste your time with things like that is beyond me. It's done, the man is a naturally born American, to an immigrant father and an American mother, like a lot of other Americans, end of the Story. Even The Donald, stupidly, went down that path and he had to eat his words.

Let it go already, it makes you all look very bitter and old minded.
The last thing we want is return America to the dark ages when we were killing witches in Salem.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projec...salem/salem.htm

Cheers

Machete, don't text!

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 05:15 PM  6 years agoPost 57
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Shut the fact up' you're eating your own word too.
!!!!!!!OBAMA FOR LIFE!!!!!!
Well than how is it that Georgia and other states are getting so far with the lawsuit if there is no merit.
Why you guys waste your time with things like that is beyond me. It's done, the man is a naturally born American, to an immigrant father and an American mother, like a lot of other Americans, end of the Story. Even The Donald, stupidly, went down that path and he had to eat his words.

Let it go already, it makes you all look very bitter and old minded.
The last thing we want is return America to the dark ages when we were killing witches in Salem.
It is not just us here on this toy helicopter forum.It is a number of states and courts within the United States.If it was so cut and dry,why are they bringing it up and filing lawsuits?

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 05:20 PM  6 years agoPost 58
MikeS

rrApprentice

So. Calif.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

When a child inherits the citizenship of their father, they become a natural-born citizen of the nation their father belongs regardless of where they might be born. It should be pointed out that citizenship through descent of the father was recognized by U.S. Naturalization law whereby children became citizens themselves as soon as their father had become a naturalized citizen, or were born in another country to a citizen father.
Yes, birth is prima facie evidence of citizenship, but only the citizenship of the nation the father is a member. I.E. KENYA or whatever it was called back then.obummers poppa was never a U.S citizen

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 05:20 PM  6 years agoPost 59
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Why you guys waste your time with things like that is beyond me. It's done, the man is a naturally born American, to an immigrant father and an American mother
His father may have been an immigrant. But, he was not a citizen.

Thats the primary issue along with the phony social security number thing with the latter that opens a lot of debate.

The issue has gone out of the conspiracy theory realm and gone into court for a final decision in just one state. So far.

Thats no ones fault but the Obummer himself and the Democrats for not vetting him better and our totally irresponsible media for ignoring it.

Thats the way it is.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
01-29-2012 05:22 PM  6 years agoPost 60
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Shut the fact up' you're eating your own word too.
!!!!!!!OBAMA FOR LIFE!!!!!!
You take him for life if you want him.

America won't.

Liberty once lost, is lost forever.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 6 pages [ <<    <     1      2     ( 3 )     4      5     NEXT    >> ] 3457 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Obama-No-Show at Trial – Sworn testimony reveals fake Social Security number, other gaps
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 10  Topic Subscribe

Wednesday, December 19 - 3:40 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

The RC discussion world needs to consolidate. RR is now one choice for that. Its software is cutting edge. It hosts on-topic advertising. Help RR increase traffic buy making suggestions, posting in RR's new areas (sites) and by spreading the word.

The RunRyder Difference

• Category system to allow Rep/Vendor postings.
• Classifieds with sold (hidden) category.
• Classifieds with separate view new.
• Answer PMs offsite via email reply.
• Member gallery photos with advanced scripting.
• Gallery photo viewer integrated into postings.
• Highly refined search with advanced back end.
• Hosts its own high end fast response servers.
• Hosts thousands of HD event coverage videos.
• Rewrote entire code base with latest technology.
• No off-topic (annoying) click bait advertising.
Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online