RunRyder RC
WATCH
 4 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2      3     NEXT    >> ] 2145 views Post Reply
Home🌌Off Topics🌌Off Topics News & Politics › Satellite spots China's first aircraft carrier at sea
12-14-2011 10:00 PM  9 years ago
Topic Vote0Post 1
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

Atlanta GA,

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Satellite spots China's first aircraft carrier at sea
china is now making our aircraft carrier
our design too same exact look tell what these guy are upto
all of this is from the money of the credit card they gave us,

i hope the DEM/GOP see how much they aid a former enemy to come and
give us a headace later on in life,

man i which donald thrump was a more serious guy who would get elected to ofice, i am quiet sure he'll fix this,

http://photoblog.msnbc.msn.com/_new...-carrier-at-sea
I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-14-2011 10:48 PM  9 years ago
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I'll PUNT !
A. Who's got a Ocean Going Tug Big Enough ?
B. Are Them the Oar's ?
C. Any body on this thing Carrier Qualified ?
D. U Whim ? I Don't Whim !
E. WHo Forgot the Hook ? / who's Woo ?
F. OH man Wee Neveer Tried this/ Woo's gona go 1st !
G. OK got It ? Everybody lean to POrt
greyeagle
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 12:03 AM  9 years ago
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

Atlanta GA,

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I'll PUNT !

A. Who's got a Ocean Going Tug Big Enough ?
B. Are Them the Oar's ?
C. Any body on this thing Carrier Qualified ?
D. U Whim ? I Don't Whim !
E. WHo Forgot the Hook ? / who's Woo ?
F. OH man Wee Neveer Tried this/ Woo's gona go 1st !
G. OK got It ? Everybody lean to POrt
I don't know what all this mean

what i was saying sooner or later china will be telling us when to sit
and when to stand,

if our leader don't get there house in order

did you take a look at the carrier

it seem like espionage to me;

could it be because we are sleeping,
I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 12:25 AM  9 years ago
Dragon2115

rrKey Veteran

New England

MyPosts All Forum Topic
china is now making our aircraft carrier
our design too same exact look tell what these guy are upto
Relax, it's a former Soviet carrier called the Varyag. It was never fully completed, tranfered to Ukrainian ownership, was stripped, and had been just floating in port in the Ukrain until around 1998. It was originally sold to a Chinese company that wanted to turn it into a floating hotel and casino for about $20 million dollars. When that fell through the Chinese government picked it up.

It's capabilities are not even close to that of our super carriers. This thing sold for less than one of the aircraft onboard one of our carriers.
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 01:51 AM  9 years ago
Trooper Sam

rrVeteran

Perris, California - USA

MyPosts All Forum Topic
But still, it's a carrier, even if it's a ski-jump carrier. It can be used for what carriers are really useful for...projecting power.

This is the one they'll use to shake out their concepts of carrier technology, their learning curve. Once they do that, then they can fast track building more, and better carriers.
Trooper Sam

We do not do this to save money, we save money to do this-TheRickster
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 05:33 AM  9 years ago
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Maybe it's useful for the Iranian's to jam up the Suez Canal with or turn it into a Casino.greyeagle
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 09:19 AM  9 years ago
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

MyPosts All Forum Topic
The Taliban are short of a few carriers and aircraft as well,still not beat yet.Never underestimate your enemies as fools.You have aleady lost if you do.China has done pretty well without bullets after the stale mate in Korea many years ago.China on its own is formidable,let alone with its ally,Russia.These are the big boys with some real competition ,not Iran.In a conventional conflict,some tough cookies.Nukes are out,because all sides have them.Someone took their eyes off the ball stomping on ants in the schoolyards of Iraq and Afghanistan and soon to be Iran when the troops are"Rested".Asia needs our attention.Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 11:08 AM  9 years ago
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I could be wrong. But, it's difficult for me to imagine China as much of a military threat to us for a very, very long time.

We are still their largest trading partner by billions upon billion of dollars. Because of that, why would they wish to make that go away? Even to make any kind of attack on our economy would certainly not be in their own economies best interests.

Heck, right now they are better capitalist than we are.

Comments are welcome.

SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 11:28 AM  9 years ago
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Like i said,the Chinese used their heads,no bullets,why would they want war?They have everything on a gold platter already.With our blessing Till that changes,i would be content too.Ordinary folks will wake up one day and see what this cheap production will mean for all of us.We have taken the drugs,it is now our problem.Just a thought, if it did happen,hope the Chinese dont fight like the Japanese or Vietnamese,just been watching HBO,s"Pacific",them Marines had balls.Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 06:17 PM  9 years ago
fla heli boy

rrElite Veteran

cape coral, florida

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I still say we (meaning Obama) need to quit p*$%ing off Russia and hook up with them as an ally. Us together would ensure our abilities to keep the Chicomms in check. We're missing a golden opportunity. We were almost there w/ Bush 2 and then it all of a sudden went to hell. Now we've got Russia rattling their sabres again.
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 06:42 PM  9 years ago
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

Atlanta GA,

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I could be wrong. But, it's difficult for me to imagine China as much of a military threat to us for a very, very long time.
And i say yes you might be wrong' a few years ago' a war with china
would be a one sided slaughter house, with the fire power we got,

a war today with china will be bloddy with the fire and man power they got

by 2015 they'll be on top of everything, if it all gos south for them,

pretty much we can say the united state of china' then aaaahhh!!!!!!!
I still say we (meaning Obama) need to quit p*$%ing off Russia and hook up
are you crazy no one can trust the russian'
I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 06:42 PM  9 years ago
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I still say we (meaning Obama) need to quit p*$%ing off Russia and hook up with them as an ally.
The best thing we can do for Russia is to leave them alone.

Same with China.

But, keep plenty of HUMINT there anyway. Plenty. In fact, more than deemed necessary. Infiltrate everything. Thats what they are doing with us. Both of them. Among others.

HUMINT = Human Intelligence.

If you don't know what that means, then you ain't wise to the world.
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 07:00 PM  9 years ago
fla heli boy

rrElite Veteran

cape coral, florida

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I'd trust the russian way before I'd trust the Chinese. We have a common interest afterall. The Chinese are a way bigger threat to them than they are to us. China needs oil, lots of it. And for them, the Russian oil fields are on the same continent over a common border.
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 07:05 PM  9 years ago
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

MyPosts All Forum Topic
I'd trust the russian way before I'd trust the Chinese. We have a common interest afterall. The Chinese are a way bigger threat to them than they are to us. China needs oil, lots of it. And for them, the Russian oil fields are on the same continent over a common border.
China would be better off supporting Russia in exploiting Russia's own oil reserves and then seeing what they can do for themselves in that respect. The better Russia does, the better China does.

With the Chinese being better at being Capitalists than we are now, the Chinese would much better not going to war with anyone (unless attacked and only to defend themselves) and only working towards a better economy in a competitive world.

Well, at least we should all hope so.

SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 07:05 PM  9 years ago
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

MyPosts All Forum Topic
Remember the Russians fought with the Chinese against us in Korea,flying the MIG 15 in combat.Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 07:18 PM  9 years ago
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

Atlanta GA,

MyPosts All Forum Topic
We and china could be 'gearing up for a head-on conflict'
all of china military build-up isn't peacefull, this's about taking
tiwan back as part of the main land,..........

this is what this is about
they got almost everything we got stealth plane now our carrier,

and a million man on foot' take heeds;
I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 07:36 PM  9 years ago
jbjones

rrVeteran

Columbus, Mississippi

MyPosts All Forum Topic
they got almost everything we got stealth plane now our carrier,
es1co2bar3, that statement is just plain-out FALSE. As stated above, that carrier is an extremely old Soviet vessel. It is likely 10 years from launching aircraft (of which they have none for Naval purposes from what I understand).
Their blue-water navy is non-existent (this means that they don't have one).

The "stealth" plane that they displayed earlier this summer was highly criticized. No one really knows if their claims are true; Most everything that I've read about it is a non-story.

You're freaking out over a country of reverse-engineers, with a dilapidated (that means worn-out) piece of obsolete (that means worthless) military hardware.

Alright, I'm through feeding the troll.
J. B. Jones
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 07:39 PM  9 years ago
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

MyPosts All Forum Topic
And the deck aint big enough for bi-planesTeam- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 07:42 PM  9 years ago
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

MyPosts All Forum Topic
And dont worry about any "Rockets"they might have,we sold em wet matchesTeam- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
12-15-2011 09:42 PM  9 years ago
es1co2bar3

rrKey Veteran

Atlanta GA,

MyPosts All Forum Topic
The height that great man reach and kept'
didn't come with a sudden fight;
but' mean-while they companion slept '

these man were planing trough the night

this is what china is doing while staying low\key
while they gave us a credit card in our hand,
to distract us

who..... knew when they will put a nuke in one of those
green container"
I was waiting on some honey but there aren't no Queen bee,
SHARE  PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 4 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2      3     NEXT    >> ] 2145 views Post Reply
Home🌌Off Topics🌌Off Topics News & Politics › Satellite spots China's first aircraft carrier at sea
Print TOPIC

 7  Topic Subscribe

Thursday, June 24 - 5:16 am - Copyright © 2000-2021 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online