RunRyder RC
WATCH
 1 page 393 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Gingrich Backs Obamacare's Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance
05-16-2011 02:40 AM  7 years agoPost 1
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Gingrich Backs Obamacare's Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance

Sunday, 15 May 2011 07:18 PM

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Sunday that he strongly supports a federal mandate requiring citizens to buy health insurance – a position that has been rejected by many Republicans, including several who likely will be running against him for the Republican presidential nomination.

Appearing on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Gingrich told host David Gregory that he continues to advocate for a plan he first called for in the early 1990s as a Congressman, which requires every uninsured citizen to purchase or acquire health insurance.

Gregory played a clip of Gingrich speaking during an appearance on Meet the Press in October 1993:

“I am for people, individuals -- exactly like automobile insurance -- individuals having health insurance and being required to have health insurance. And I am prepared to vote for a voucher system which will give individuals, on a sliding scale, a government subsidy so we insure that everyone as individuals have health insurance.”

Gregory asked Gingrich if he would criticize GOP presidential rival Mitt Romney, whose "Romneycare" health program enacted during his time as Governor in Massachusetts mandated that all uninsured purchase health insurance.

Gingrich replied he would not make it an issue in the campaign and said he agreed with key aspects of Romneycare.

"I agree that all of us have a responsibility to pay--help pay for health care," Gingrich said, adding, "I've said consistently we ought to have some requirement that you either have health insurance or you post a bond ..."

Gingrich also admitted that his proposal is a "variation" of the individual mandate, a key component of the Obamacare legislation President Obama signed into law in 2010.

The position staked out by Gingrich appears to be at odds with leading conservative critics of Obamacare, who argue that the law requiring citizens to purchase a private insurance policy is not constitutional.

The Obama administration is currently facing three lawsuits arguing that the federal mandate is unconstitutional, including one filed by a coalition of 26 states.

The issue is on track for a Supreme Court decision in the summer of 2012, which would make it a likely hot-button topic heading into the elections.

Conservative GOP critics like Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli say the mandate is unconstitutional because although Congress can regulate commerce, it can’t require people to engage in a particular “economic activity” just because they live in the U.S.

Conservative judicial experts have also taken exception to the claim made by Gingrich and supporters of the Obamacare law that mandating health insurance is the same as the government requirement to purchase car insurance, noting that driving a car is a privilege provided by states and not a constitutional right.

Cucinelli says that "buying auto insurance is voluntary, since you are only required to purchase it if you choose to drive on public roads. But buying health insurance under the new federal law is not voluntary, as you are required to buy it just by virtue of the fact that you are breathing. The federal government has never before in history exercised its regulatory power to require someone to buy a product or service as a condition of residence in the United States."

Gingrich, though, seemed to disagree with that notion on Sunday, though he was quick to point out the differences between his plan and the federal health law.

“In, in the first place, Obama basically is trying to replace the entire insurance system, creating state exchanges, building a Washington-based model, creating a federal system,” Gingrich told NBC’s David Gregory. “I believe all of us--and this is going to be a big debate--I believe all of us have a responsibility to help pay for healthcare …"

Romney has not come under fire for not disowning his health care plan, which has caused private health care insurance rates to skyrocket as patient services have declined in Massachusetts.

Gingrich's position quickly came under fire from several conservative blogs on Sunday.

“He tried to distinguish his mandate from the Obama mandate, but with little success,” the American Federalist Journal wrote on Sunday.

“Sandbagging your fellow Republicans in Congress and offering tacit support for a key (unconstitutional) component of Obamacare is a very strange way to begin a run in a Republican primary. Not a strong start.”

The Wall Street Journal called Gingrich’s description of an ideal healthcare plan with mandates a “pretty good description of what the Democratic Congress passed into law last year."

The Journal continued: "Beginning in 2014, most Americans who don't have insurance will be required to pay a fee, with many, depending on income, getting subsidies to help buy coverage through state-based exchanges.”

The conservative website Red State said Gingrich “won’t exactly endear him to the Tea Party crowd or the reform minded movement sweeping the GOP.”

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/gin...omo_code=C446-1

My Comments: Looks like old Newt just committed political suicide on the right.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-16-2011 03:48 AM  7 years agoPost 2
windy62

rrApprentice

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Yep. Just lost my vote. Will be writing a letter tomorrow to let him know...

windy62

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
05-16-2011 12:39 PM  7 years agoPost 3
baby uh1

rrVeteran

St. James, Mo.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

There you have good old NEOCON Newt! This is why the Republicans screwed up everything after their victory in 94. They let this idiot lead them!
I wish he and McLame would just go ahead and turn full Democrat and stop screwing up the Republican party!

Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-16-2011 06:38 PM  7 years agoPost 4
InvertedDude

rrVeteran

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

..
..

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-16-2011 08:44 PM  7 years agoPost 5
helo_chris

rrVeteran

goodlettsville, tn

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Actually Newts leadership is what put the country back on track. And The title is misleading, he supports mandates for everyone to carry insurance but does not think Obamacare is the way to do it. What NG supports is similar to the what Romney passed in Mass. A lot of what he said is being taken out of context. Not sure I agree with either one, but what he was advocating is nothing like Obamacare.

"There is a fine line between cutting edge and bleeding edge.."

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-16-2011 09:28 PM  7 years agoPost 6
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

A lot of what he said is being taken out of context. Not sure I agree with either one, but what he was advocating is nothing like Obamacare.
Then he had better get his message across like real quick.

I saw his first statement on this matter and it came across the same as ObamaCare. His rebuttal to the first message came across as convoluted BS and once again, the same as ObamaCare. Or, at the very least, very similar. Same as the RomneyCare BS.

Looks to me as though he lost it as soon as he opened his mouth. Then lost it the moment he flapped his lips again.

Its quite unlike him and speaking for myself, he has lost my trust completely. I sent him a message through his web site telling him so.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-16-2011 09:46 PM  7 years agoPost 7
helo_chris

rrVeteran

goodlettsville, tn

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I agree he hasnt handled it well and he should have clarified the moment he said it. I am completely, utterly against Obamacare but am torn on states having mandates that everyone carry health insurance. On the one hand I think its over stepping. But at the same time if they are going to require the hospitals and doctors provide the care then people should be obligated to pay for it.

Personally I think the answer is to move completely away from health insurance as a benefit or in any way provided for you. Remove the barriers to insurance companies competing across state lines and put it back in the hands of consumers. The biggest problem we have in regard to healthcare is the fact that very few individuals have any idea what the true cost actually is.

"There is a fine line between cutting edge and bleeding edge.."

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-16-2011 09:51 PM  7 years agoPost 8
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The biggest problem we have in regard to healthcare is the fact that very few individuals have any idea what the true cost actually is.
They are going to find out real quick if ObamaCare gets through all the courts. Then, it will be the government handling the entire health care system.

The cost of that will be far more then just the money it costs.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-17-2011 12:23 AM  7 years agoPost 9
baby uh1

rrVeteran

St. James, Mo.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

What NG supports is similar to the what Romney passed in Mass.
And Romney doesn't even support Obamacare! Or Romneycare either for that matter, he says that it was a mistake!

Rush tried to make it sound like Newt was trying to pull a trick by saying those things but I think that Newt has more than shown that he is just another inside the beltway, ruling class idiot!

Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 393 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Gingrich Backs Obamacare's Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 2  Topic Subscribe

Wednesday, September 26 - 7:46 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

The RC discussion world needs to consolidate. RR is now one choice for that. Its software is cutting edge. It hosts on-topic advertising. Help RR increase traffic buy making suggestions, posting in RR's new areas (sites) and by spreading the word.

The RunRyder Difference

• Category system to allow Rep/Vendor postings.
• Classifieds with sold (hidden) category.
• Classifieds with separate view new.
• Answer PMs offsite via email reply.
• Member gallery photos with advanced scripting.
• Gallery photo viewer integrated into postings.
• Highly refined search with advanced back end.
• Hosts its own high end fast response servers.
• Hosts thousands of HD event coverage videos.
• Rewrote entire code base with latest technology.
• No off-topic (annoying) click bait advertising.
Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online