RunRyder RC
WATCH
 9 pages [ <<    <     4      5     ( 6 )     7      8     NEXT    >> ] 7449 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Coast to Coast am Where Did the Towers go Dr. Judy Wood 05-03-2011
05-11-2011 03:57 AM  7 years agoPost 101
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I can't for the life of me see how anyone can look at these beams and say they were sheared off even buy a falling structure.
You see. There was a rescue and recovery effort. Those beams were cut to remove them along with other stuff to make an effort getting at the victims and recovering remains.

You CT guys just use those pics of those cut beams to further your CT crapola.

Thats it. Nothing else.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 04:22 AM  7 years agoPost 102
albatross

rrApprentice

Texas, Houston area

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Crapper what makes you think your BS trumps these experts opinions?

http://www.ae911truth.org/evidence.html

...my handle backwards is how I feel about current world affairs...

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 04:43 AM  7 years agoPost 103
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

what makes you think your BS trumps these experts opinions?
there all nut jobs who make a living of feeding BS to you, you suck it up just like the rest of the bottom feeders.

hey its easy, show me footage of explosions that started the collapse of both twin towers.

crap blowing out of a falling building doesnt cut it in the real world

steel beams with cutting torch marks dont cut it either in the real world.

You tin foil hat wearing crowd will suck anything up put on the CT plate.

the rest of us think with a open mind.

your a copy paste queen with no thought or valid opinion of your own

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 04:55 AM  7 years agoPost 104
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

what a bunch of horse pucky all that is. they are not experts as you call them.

they are conpiracy nutters selling you not me.

they show the building falling down and claim explosions.

what do you think a building that has millions of pounds of debris pancaking it down is going to look like???

there is no way the building could take the upper floors falling down into itself.

you may want to study tubular strength before you open your ignorant copy paste mouth.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 05:20 AM  7 years agoPost 105
nitro fun

rrApprentice

Oc ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

[quoteQuote
i got a roll of aluminum foil, i`ll make Dr. Judy Wood a cool new foil hat..

Is that the same roll you used to make the hat your wearing?if so keep that roll for yourself.[/quote]

i`ll make you a cool tin foil hat too...

anyone with a brain, and a some understanding of red hot steel, can figure out the loads on the building..

the blueprints are online. calculators are cheap.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 05:22 AM  7 years agoPost 106
albatross

rrApprentice

Texas, Houston area

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

the rest of us think with a open mind
Thats funny I am beginning to think everyone on the West Coast is high.

...my handle backwards is how I feel about current world affairs...

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 05:29 AM  7 years agoPost 107
nitro fun

rrApprentice

Oc ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

i wander how many people understand that all the support structure for the building is on the outside of the building, and it has NO fire protection on it.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 05:38 AM  7 years agoPost 108
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

i wander how many people understand that all the support structure for the building is on the outside of the building, and it has NO fire protection on it.
not only that the center supports were not as strong some with a 65' spread.

the only people that think its a conspiracy have already proven their ignorance, lack of real evidence and drink blindly the 120 proof conspiracy juice

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 08:22 AM  7 years agoPost 109
Hamo

rrVeteran

Ireland

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

there is no way the building could take the upper floors falling down into itself.
Outhouse, this comment indicates you don't have any knowledge of physics.
The lower floors always support the weight of whatever is above.
The weight does not increase when the walls collapse.
It's only when an object comes crashing down at high speed that the impact is worse.

Hamo

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 11:19 AM  7 years agoPost 110
rcjon

rrVeteran

Macon, GA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I know for a fact they were brought down by demolition.
Many, many people that worked in the towers survived. Why has not a single one of them ever come out and said, "I saw workers come into the buildings during the week before the incident, expose the beams, and strap packages to them."

In fact it would take weeks to rig the towers for an implosion.

Oh wait, maybe they were all paid off, or the government used previously unknown invisible workers and explosives.

Carl Sagan said, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof."

The CT folks don't have any proof, even ordinary proof.

But it is entertaining to see how facts can be twisted to match the nutter theories.

Ask your doctor if your heart is healthy enough for Radio Control Helicoptering.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 11:21 AM  7 years agoPost 111
rcjon

rrVeteran

Macon, GA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Outhouse, this comment indicates you don't have any knowledge of physics.
The lower floors always support the weight of whatever is above.
Negatory. The core and the skin supports the floors.

Ask your doctor if your heart is healthy enough for Radio Control Helicoptering.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 11:47 AM  7 years agoPost 112
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Ahhhhhhhh I see that no one has figured anything else out yet.We are still deadlocked.

Tinhats - 10 ,Blinders - 10
when all you have is misinformation your done
I just keep on showing my videos and you keep showing yours.Its called a stalemate.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 12:32 PM  7 years agoPost 113
baby uh1

rrVeteran

St. James, Mo.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The size of the Boeing 767 gives it an empty weight of 188705 lbs (85595 kg). The loaded weight of the E 767 is 284110 lbs (equivalent to 128870 kg). ...
Tiny plane? Holy crap! My calculator doesn't have enough zeros to calculate the kinetic energy of that impact!

Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 01:05 PM  7 years agoPost 114
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

These were built to tolerate a direct hit by a jet of that size.

Watch at YouTube

I gotta stop arguing with idiots,they are only bringing me down to their level,and they are so experienced.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 01:47 PM  7 years agoPost 115
Hamo

rrVeteran

Ireland

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Tiny plane? Holy crap! My calculator doesn't have enough zeros to calculate the kinetic energy of that impact!
You don't need a calculator to work out the kinetic energy of the plane that hit tower 7. It's ZERO point ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
Hamo

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 02:29 PM  7 years agoPost 116
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

These were built to tolerate a direct hit by a jet of that size.
No they weren't.

You cannot prove that with any RELIABLE evidence at all.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 02:44 PM  7 years agoPost 117
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Awww cmon,you have more 'spin' words than the evening news Dennis....
Reliable to who?the evening news/a toy helicopter forum?Alex jones? reliable...pfffft
After the bombing of the WTC in 1993, Leslie Robertson, one of the engineers who worked on the towers' structural design in the 1960s, claimed that each had been built to withstand the impact of a fully fueled 707.
http://community.seattletimes.nwsou...27&slug=1687698

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2001/s...owers_built_to/

http://www.science-writing.org/id29.html

.
Chlliah Sundararajan, Ph.D
9.3 Could the aircraft Impact Alone Collapse the Towers?
Impact damage alone did not cause the collapse of the toers,as the y were stable after the aircraft impact.Global analyses performed during the investigation showed that both towers had substantial reserve capacity after the aircraft impact.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 03:21 PM  7 years agoPost 118
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Awww cmon,you have more 'spin' words than the evening news Dennis....
Reliable to who?
There is no spin. I am not offering anything other than what actually happened on 9/11.

The ragheads did it.

Your links offer little in evidence as those so called engineers predictions that the towers could withstand a airliner impact were obviously flawed and overblown.

One of them even said both the fire suppression systems in the towers and the fireproofing was not adequate to withstand a jet impact.

The CT bullsh*t is only there is you WANT it to be.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 03:23 PM  7 years agoPost 119
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The CT bullsh*t is only there is you WANT it to be.
Well I's want's it to be's,and you's dont.

Enough on Tower 1 and 2.......
lets move on to Tower 7 where there was no aircraft involved.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
05-11-2011 03:37 PM  7 years agoPost 120
PsychoZ

rrApprentice

Northern, CA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

From NIST website posted 8/21/08:

“Did investigators consider the possibility that an explosion caused or contributed to the collapse of WTC 7?
Yes, this possibility was investigated carefully. NIST concluded that blast events inside the building did not occur and found no evidence supporting the existence of a blast event.
In addition, no blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses. According to calculations by the investigation team, the smallest blast capable of failing the building’s critical column would have resulted in a sound level of 130 decibels (dB) to 140 dB at a distance of at least half a mile, if unobstructed by surrounding buildings. This sound level is consistent with a gunshot blast, standing next to a jet plane engine, and more than 10 times louder than being in front of the speakers at a rock concert.
For the building to have been prepared for intentional demolition, walls and/or column enclosures and fireproofing would have to be removed and replaced without being detected. Preparing a column includes steps such as cutting sections with torches, which produces noxious and odorous fumes. Intentional demolition usually requires applying explosive charges to most, if not all, interior columns, not just one or a limited set of columns in a building.”

Tea Parties are for little girls with imaginary friends

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 9 pages [ <<    <     4      5     ( 6 )     7      8     NEXT    >> ] 7449 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Coast to Coast am Where Did the Towers go Dr. Judy Wood 05-03-2011
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 12  Topic Subscribe

Sunday, September 23 - 1:24 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

The RC discussion world needs to consolidate. RR is now one choice for that. Its software is cutting edge. It hosts on-topic advertising. Help RR increase traffic buy making suggestions, posting in RR's new areas (sites) and by spreading the word.

The RunRyder Difference

• Category system to allow Rep/Vendor postings.
• Classifieds with sold (hidden) category.
• Classifieds with separate view new.
• Answer PMs offsite via email reply.
• Member gallery photos with advanced scripting.
• Gallery photo viewer integrated into postings.
• Highly refined search with advanced back end.
• Hosts its own high end fast response servers.
• Hosts thousands of HD event coverage videos.
• Rewrote entire code base with latest technology.
• No off-topic (annoying) click bait advertising.
Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online