RunRyder RC
WATCH
 711 pages [ <<    <     299     ( 300 )     301     NEXT    >> ] 322410 views TOPIC CLOSED
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › God Did Create Mankind.
05-15-2011 01:20 AM  7 years agoPost 5981
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

outhouse
he is a organic chemist not a biologist and doesnt have the education in the proper fields and is not taken seriously by mainstream science
Dood. By your own admission, you are a high school drop out.

Is there anyone here that would take YOU seriously?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 01:21 AM  7 years agoPost 5982
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

evolutionary comparison (from left to right
outhouse is the little twerp in the center.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 01:41 AM  7 years agoPost 5983
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

but where did the Information come from ????
its chemistry bud. We have posted countless vids in this thread about how easy abiogenesis can happen.

Do you understand how long a billion years is???? well thats almost how long it took the earth to cool and water to form lol

they say life arose in about a 400,000 year span

we are made from the same material the whole universe is made from.

Like the earth we are mostly salt water

we are carbon based life forms

I can say with the amount of divirsity of life on the earth that you cannot keep life down. After super volcanos and asteroid impacts that have wiped out species in the past and how fast some species evolve is amazing.

homo sapiens and our ancestors that go back 7 million years is but a blink of an eye in a geological time scale

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 01:48 AM  7 years agoPost 5984
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

DC, you got some real nerve calling someone on copy & paste. LOL

https://rc.runryder.com/t...1/?p=5326996#RR

Everyone does it, me, Dennis, Erb (see above), and most certainly you and albatross. So what?
Hey Scoliosis,notice when I cut and paste,I almost always use the quotes.
Out(to lunch) posted it as if it were his own words.

Nice try Scoal.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:15 AM  7 years agoPost 5985
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Look behind you doug

I swear I just the CIA looking at you!!!

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:16 AM  7 years agoPost 5986
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Look behind you doug

I swear I just the CIA looking at you!!!
Tonight must be two for one at the outhouse.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:20 AM  7 years agoPost 5987
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I don't know, there is no liturature talking about it more than 6000 years ago. Once again it is only theory beyond that. Do you know? If so, based on what evidence? I'm still waiting on that map you say that you have.
Radiometric dating of isotopes in rocks, such as Uranium-235.

Is lack of literature preceding 6000 years, your sole basis for believing that the earth might only be 6000 years old, seriously?
Carbon dating is extremely inaccurate
Why would you mention carbon dating?
Also who's to say that the skulls weren't actual human skulls with a genetic abnormality or endocrine abnormality?
They're too old.

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:23 AM  7 years agoPost 5988
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Hey Scoliosis,notice when I cut and paste,I almost always use the quotes.
So you admit that sometimes you don't, yet you call someone else out for doing the same?

Clutching at straws, perhaps?

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:28 AM  7 years agoPost 5989
Gearhead

rrMaster

Vt

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

"abiogenesis"
outhouse,, don't you find it funny that your "abiogenesis" has not happen again lately ??
it only happen once all those years ago, and then everything on earth evolved from that one time and it has not happen again,, I find that rather questionable

Jim
Buzz Buzz Buzz

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:34 AM  7 years agoPost 5990
DougCart

rrNovice

Port Charlotte, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

So you admit that sometimes you don't, yet you call someone else out for doing the same?
Cmon,Really?ok,I ALWAYS quote items I copy and paste is that better.Find one time I did not.

Talking about clutching for straws.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:34 AM  7 years agoPost 5991
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

outhouse,, don't you find it funny that your "abiogenesis" has not happen again lately ??
LOL

how do you know its not????

really thats about the most ignorant thing ive heard in thsi thread besides creation and ID

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:44 AM  7 years agoPost 5992
Gearhead

rrMaster

Vt

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

""how do you know its not""

well I guess you can show me it has ??? please do !!

outhouse, I also find it rather funny that you have no thoughts or questions for the unanswered questions, O-yeeaa there are lots and lots of theories but there are many unanswered questions,
I mean to you, it seems it happen this way and only this way and don't worry about the unanswered questions, cause, everything will fall into place,, personally I think that is small minded

Jim
Buzz Buzz Buzz

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:50 AM  7 years agoPost 5993
Rogman88

rrElite Veteran

West Monroe, LA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

its not theory.

the skulls are facts, the timeline is well known
The primate skulls are facts, the DNA linking them is not. The timeline is established how? How do we know that they are oldest to youngest? Did we use carbon dating?

Oh and your cut and past on how hold the earth is. The formula. Was it tested on material that was documented to be 3.5 billion years old by a guy who was there? Then was it compared with the guys notes at 2.5 million years (the guy who was there) to make an establishment of it's accuracy? How bout the meteor material? Did we compare that to the aliens notes on how old it was to establish the accuracy of the age of the material.

Your little fat man skeleton in the middle looked to have poor little fat mans genetics or possibly a metabolic disorder. Maybe he just had a case of achondroplasia. Maybe we could do a DNA test to see? No wait...evolution doesn't look at DNA to tie random skeletons into a timeline...

High Voltage just works better

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 02:55 AM  7 years agoPost 5994
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

well I guess you can show me it has ???
I would think if a simple life form happened to pop up now it would be food for a higher known life form gearhead.

Im not saying it is per say as conditions now and then are completely different.

its not a bad question it just has no bearing on the topic at all.
outhouse, I also find it rather funny that you have no thoughts or questions for the unanswered questions,
Man there are more unanswered questions then theorys but what I wont do is make the same mistake as many have made in the past. Others have hot a wall with their knowledge and then insert deity at that point. That is primitive thinking amd man has made this mistake for thousands of years. Its time we evolve past it and admit we dont know anything about a deity of any kind and try and look for a real answer to a real problem.

throwing god in is a cop out and a mistake just because you dont have a answer to a question.

Newton was one of the most brilliant minds who has done more for humanity, its amazing what he accomplished. He hit a wall and wrote "god must have taken control at this point" because he could not answer the question. Right after his death another scientist picks up his books and answered the question instantly because he didnt have a thought of a deity blocking him at that point.

at the end of mans knowledge there is always a god to fill the gaps.

God of the gaps? look at the vid 4-6 pages back with Neil Degrasse Tyson ,,, he tells it better then me

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 03:02 AM  7 years agoPost 5995
Gearhead

rrMaster

Vt

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

""its not a bad question it just has no bearing on the topic at all""

wow that's how you get around that ??

""throwing god in is a cop out and a mistake just because you dont have a answer to a question""

he may not have been what we think of is a "God",, he may have been a smarter Life Form

Jim
Buzz Buzz Buzz

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 03:02 AM  7 years agoPost 5996
Rogman88

rrElite Veteran

West Monroe, LA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Is lack of literature preceding 6000 years, your sole basis for believing that the earth might only be 6000 years old, seriously?
Just saying that there is no documentation to prove otherwise.
Why would you mention carbon dating?
Because evolutionists use this as the means to establish a time line. Two skeletons found in a similar area that may only be a 40 years apart. One that into a tar pit and another that was buried, will have different mineral deposits into the bone as they were petrified, thus causing a fluctuation in the carbon date that would make them appear to be separated by 1000's of years, when actually one may be the others great grandpa, who just so happened to have had scurvy due to vitamin deficiency. You know people of those days didn't have the greatest diet and were often vitamin deficient (vitamin D, C, calcium, B12 etc...) causing bone abnormalities and skeletal defects seen in Outy's family picture...

Just mess'n with ya Outhouse!
[quote]Also who's to say that the skulls weren't actual human skulls with a genetic abnormality or endocrine abnormality?
They're too old.
Once again...established how?

High Voltage just works better

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 03:05 AM  7 years agoPost 5997
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Did we use carbon dating?
No
The timeline is established how? How do we know that they are oldest to youngest?
radio dating methods that are not up for dispute due to there high accuracy rate
. Was it tested on material that was documented to be 3.5 billion years old by a guy who was there? Then was it compared with the guys notes at 2.5 million years (the guy who was there) to make an establishment of it's accuracy? How bout the meteor material? Did we compare that to the aliens notes on how old it was to establish the accuracy of the age of the material.
please your embarrassing yourself.

the age of the world is not up for debate
Your little fat man skeleton in the middle looked to have poor little fat mans genetics or possibly a metabolic disorder. Maybe he just had a case of achondroplasia. Maybe we could do a DNA test to see? No wait...evolution doesn't look at DNA to tie random skeletons into a timeline...:
anyone can belittle what they do not know

its a poor rebuttle

again you go against mainstream science all of it, you also go against institutions like the Smithsonian. The law is also on my side outlawing creation or ID in public schools to keep from poisoning young minds. You go against geology and biology.

to make claims like you do, you in fact are the one required to show proof of creation or ID, you cannot produce facts or evidence of any kind regarding your myth.

anyone can try and find holes in science, that does not prove creation, it only shows your ignornace at hand with modern knowledge

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 03:06 AM  7 years agoPost 5998
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

he may not have been what we think of is a "God",, he may have been a smarter Life Form
just when did said life form step in and do what??

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 03:08 AM  7 years agoPost 5999
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Once again...established how?
current dating methods are not up for debate at all

only young earth creationist who are a minority and not involved in any part of science have issues with dating methods

do you believe in the global flood myth???

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
05-15-2011 03:09 AM  7 years agoPost 6000
JimmyC

rrApprentice

Gaithersburg, Maryland USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

outhouse, God bless you for keeping this thread alive

JimmyC

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
WATCH
 711 pages [ <<    <     299     ( 300 )     301     NEXT    >> ] 322410 views TOPIC CLOSED
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › God Did Create Mankind.
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 30  Topic Subscribe

Saturday, September 22 - 11:59 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

The RC discussion world needs to consolidate. RR is now one choice for that. Its software is cutting edge. It hosts on-topic advertising. Help RR increase traffic buy making suggestions, posting in RR's new areas (sites) and by spreading the word.

The RunRyder Difference

• Category system to allow Rep/Vendor postings.
• Classifieds with sold (hidden) category.
• Classifieds with separate view new.
• Answer PMs offsite via email reply.
• Member gallery photos with advanced scripting.
• Gallery photo viewer integrated into postings.
• Highly refined search with advanced back end.
• Hosts its own high end fast response servers.
• Hosts thousands of HD event coverage videos.
• Rewrote entire code base with latest technology.
• No off-topic (annoying) click bait advertising.
Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online