RunRyder RC
WATCH
 711 pages [ <<    <     265     ( 266 )     267     NEXT    >> ] 320512 views TOPIC CLOSED
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › God Did Create Mankind.
04-21-2011 06:38 PM  7 years agoPost 5301
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

dude you copy to much junk
Confounding earlier skeptics, but confirming the Bible, an important discovery was made in Egypt in 1896. A tablet—the Merneptah Stela—was found that mentions Israel. (Merneptah was the pharaoh that ruled Egypt in 1212-1202 B.C.) The context of the stela indicates that Israel was a significant entity in the late 13th century B.C.
wrong again

please post links to your junk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merneptah_Stele

"—the hieroglyphs that refer to Israel instead employ the determinative sign used for foreign peoples: a throw stick plus a man and a woman over three vertical plural lines. This sign is typically used by the Egyptians to signify nomadic tribes without a fixed city-state, thus implying that ysrỉꜣr "Israel" was the demonym for a seminomadic or rural population at the time the stele was created.[3]

what part of nomatic tribe or rural population do you not understand????

it is common knowledge that hebrews culture started in 1250 BC ish

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 06:45 PM  7 years agoPost 5302
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

what part of nomatic tribe or rural population do you not understand????
What part of Wikipedia do you not understand?:

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 07:26 PM  7 years agoPost 5303
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

What part of Wikipedia do you not understand?:
racoon

what part of its common knowledge the hebrew culture started 1250BC dont you understand ????

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 07:40 PM  7 years agoPost 5304
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

what part of its common knowledge the hebrew culture started 1250BC dont you understand ????
You lost the point outhouse. The point was:

What part of Wikipedia do you not understand?:

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

When anyone can edit Wiki, then its a totally unreliable source. I noticed you use it a lot for your references. That means You are unreliable.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 08:37 PM  7 years agoPost 5305
sks

rrApprentice

london

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

When anyone can edit Wiki, then its a totally unreliable source. I noticed you use it a lot for your references. That means You are unreliable.
I find it strange that you should say this because it can be cleared up AT ONCE.

Whether you accuse someone of being unreliable is neither here nor there, the point should be if you can follow his reasoning and logic. Since you prefer tit for tat trading of insults and links etc, it tells me immediately that you are not defending anything but your right to think something is valid just because you say it is - and that tells me a lot about you.

I use wikipedia a lot if I want to look up some mathematical stuff, and even though as you say there is a possibility of it being subject to whims and content being unreliable is it however reliable for most of its content. If someone posted something wrong it would be correctly quite quickly and effectively.

Since you like to post links of other sources etc. . . and never really do your OWN research like outhouse does on the Bible this tells me that you are willing to believe because you want to. And that is just vanity, egotism and laziness on your part.

If outhouse stated that the hebrew culture started 1250BC then there are ways for you to verify it for yourself, and even outhouse will give pointers. The fact that you haven't followed this line of inquiry but just try to discredit him without even thinking "maybe he's correct, what do I need to do to prove it to myself that he is" tells me that you should be darted and sent to Afghan zoo where you belong.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 08:49 PM  7 years agoPost 5306
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I use wikipedia a lot if I want to look up some mathematical stuff, and even though as you say there is a possibility of it being subject to whims and content being unreliable is it however reliable for most of its content. If someone posted something wrong it would be correctly quite quickly and effectively.
That may be true. But, if anyone can edit Wiki at any time, then what you just said could be edited again on a whim by anyone. That makes Wiki unreliable no matter how much its defended to not be.

Of course, you have to have at least an average level of common sense first before you can realize that.
Since you like to post links of other sources etc. . . and never really do your OWN research like outhouse does on the Bible
OWN research ?????
The fact that you haven't followed this line of inquiry but just try to discredit him
Just the simple fact that he uses Wiki almost exclusively tells me all I need to know about about outhouse's FACTS.

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 08:57 PM  7 years agoPost 5307
sks

rrApprentice

london

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Just the simple fact that he uses Wiki almost exclusively tells me all I need to know about about outhouse's FACTS.
but outhouse can tell if something is crap or not - it seems you can't. Wikipedia also does not have a religious bias or a hidden agenda, and therefore not subject to such influence unlike the crap you link to.
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.
so what? you imply that since it's unreliable (which it isn't by the way since it does have some kind of refereeing process), it shouldn't be trusted. I rather trust wiki over sites that have hidden agendas and are not open to correction.

you can go and edit Darwin's reference and try and rubbish it, but I guarantee you'll be correctly almost instantly because there will be a lot of proper experts to put you in your place.

outhouse can point you to all the Bible stories and how it was all made up. Whether wikipedia shows that or not is of no concern to this discussion, or what links says this or that. He can show you this stuff and you refuse to accept it. That I find disgusting because it takes a lot of hard work for what outhouse did - but people like you can't see that because your faith has blinded you to reason.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 09:47 PM  7 years agoPost 5308
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

What part of Wikipedia do you not understand?:

Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit.

When anyone can edit Wiki, then its a totally unreliable source. I noticed you use it a lot for your references. That means You are unreliable.
I know this and fight the abuse all the time, its not hat unreliable and wrong material gets edited off quickly racoon.

BUT the point is, I know the information first before I back it with wiki links.

most of what I know has been learned from biblical scholars and the books they have written.

to study religion is more then a copy and paste job. there is left, right and middle of the road. I stay in the middle for this forums sake.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 09:52 PM  7 years agoPost 5309
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

so what? you imply that since it's unreliable (which it isn't by the way since it does have some kind of refereeing process), it shouldn't be trusted. I rather trust wiki over sites that have hidden agendas and are not open to correction.
oh so true

nothing gets edited properly in the bible.

we all know its full of lies and fables that never happened, we all know the dates and timelines are wrong in many areas. we all know there were no first hand witnesses at all,,,,,, but they want to follow it hook line and sinker.

we all know ancient hebrews created and worshipped more then one god, we know they abandoned all but one god including gods wife.

we all know the bible was ment to be read allegorically but in america the literal translation is pathetic.

thats the whole point of this thread, the literal translation has lost so many minds to lies! instead of the truth behind the real science of evolution.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 09:56 PM  7 years agoPost 5310
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

to study religion is more then a copy and paste job. there is left, right and middle of the road. I stay in the middle for this forums sake.
Middle of the road ????

Which road ?

:
but outhouse can tell if something is crap or not - it seems you can't. Wikipedia also does not have a religious bias or a hidden agenda, and therefore not subject to such influence unlike the crap you link to.
If Wiki can be edited by anyone, then it will be as biased as anyone editing it. You cannot prove otherwise.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 10:16 PM  7 years agoPost 5311
sks

rrApprentice

london

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

If Wiki can be edited by anyone, then it will be as biased as anyone editing it. You cannot prove otherwise.
absolutely correct. But you forget the logical difference: when we have public being able to edit anyone who writes CRAP can be overruled immediately by an expert. What makes this expert have validity is that his stuff can stand on its own merits.

I read maths books from time to time. By your argument they should be unreliable because they can "be written by anyone" (and sometimes they are). But I know, when reading through a maths books whether it's wrong or not.

Same with wikipedia.

so your argument doesn't hold much water. If someone did post crap on wiki it would be corrected very quickly. Most of the contentious crap on wiki is mostly down to people having fun, fooling around etc. . or libeling celebrities info etc. . . not the serious stuff, otherwise it, as a public resource project, would have died a long time ago. It's like open source software that anyone can change if they wanted to, but a lot of open source projects are still in use, and that's because they have a refereeing process and a means of "taking the crap out". If people were allowed to run amok and f@£@£ up the code then the software would not be running properly on our computers now would it?

But all this points to is the fact that you ONLY WANT to believe what you want to believe, and that's egotism to the highest degree. It's also f@£@£@ disgusting to say the least.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 10:56 PM  7 years agoPost 5312
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

so your argument doesn't hold much water.
most racoons cant hold much water

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 11:21 PM  7 years agoPost 5313
sks

rrApprentice

london

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

there were no raccoons in Death in Venice - I wonder why? Maybe Thomas Mann thought to himself: that deluded religious moron's going to ruin it for all of us.

meanwhile, it's great to see Grey at work.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 11:26 PM  7 years agoPost 5314
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

absolutely correct. But you forget the logical difference: when we have public being able to edit anyone who writes CRAP can be overruled immediately by an expert. What makes this expert have validity is that his stuff can stand on its own merits.

I read maths books from time to time. By your argument they should be unreliable because they can "be written by anyone" (and sometimes they are). But I know, when reading through a maths books whether it's wrong or not.

Same with wikipedia.
Putting sunshine up our butts, it comes out like BS.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 11:33 PM  7 years agoPost 5315
sks

rrApprentice

london

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

then don't use the computer that you're on. It's obviously BS and not working is it? Considering that a lot of the software that runs it and is involved in internet traffic and delivery is also partly open source.

you can never accept that you post crap, can you?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-21-2011 11:51 PM  7 years agoPost 5316
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

then don't use the computer that you're on. It's obviously BS and not working is it? Considering that a lot of the software that runs it and is involved in internet traffic and delivery is also partly open source.

you can never accept that you post crap, can you?
Yeah but I can sure tell when someone is trying to throw sunshine up my butt.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-22-2011 12:51 AM  7 years agoPost 5317
Fred Stone

rrNovice

UK

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Pullup a chair and break open a 6 pack.
Popcorn anyone ?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-22-2011 12:55 AM  7 years agoPost 5318
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

so your argument doesn't hold much water.
It never does. Rather than research it for himself, and tell us what he thinks, the only argument Dennis can come up with is ''you don't know it's right and you can't prove it''. It's just a variation on the ''you don't know, nobody knows'' so-called 'argument' that he's been using throughout this thread.

Maybe we can find a better use for him.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-22-2011 01:00 AM  7 years agoPost 5319
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

It never does. Rather than research it for himself, and tell us what he thinks, the only argument Dennis can come up with is ''you don't know it's right and you can't prove it''. It's just a variation on the ''you don't know, nobody knows'' so-called 'argument' that he's been using throughout this thread.
Thats correct.

Nobody knows.

There are just those that claim they know.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
04-22-2011 01:09 AM  7 years agoPost 5320
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Gird Your Loin's : !!!!! Great Hunters: SHe's Gona Be a Two Part -er !!!!
But your gona half to wait in suspense a bit

We just finished off a Great Big : Pic a Nik Basket and I have a house call to make: not over too Mr. Park Ranger's though ---

Tid O bit of a spoiler: ??? Wikapedia as a source for Confirming the Word of GOD !!!! ??? / For a fact I Know a Pretty Meek Guy who has a sense of Humor.

WATCH OUT ! : Don't get um Upset ! Especially on Easter !!! He may just send down a Finger of Lighting and stir your Noggin

Series will follow in 2 Part's

!st Part : { The Toilet Bowel Response }

= Title / Crazier Than an OUTHOUSE RAT

2nd Part : Dedicated on a Separate Post

TOMORROW A DAY OF MYSTERY - A LION WILL APPEAR !!!

Please Stay Tuned : The Credit's are Note Worthy !!!

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
WATCH
 711 pages [ <<    <     265     ( 266 )     267     NEXT    >> ] 320512 views TOPIC CLOSED
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › God Did Create Mankind.
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 30  Topic Subscribe

Wednesday, July 18 - 2:07 pm - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online