RunRyder RC
WATCH
 711 pages [ <<    <     129     ( 130 )     131     NEXT    >> ] 321462 views TOPIC CLOSED
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › God Did Create Mankind.
12-27-2010 10:31 AM  7 years agoPost 2581
shawmcky

rrElite Veteran

Isle of Wight,United Kingdom

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Anyway
As long as i come back as Hugh Hefner next time,i will be happy

Team- unbiased opinion.K.I.S.S principle upheld here

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
12-27-2010 11:10 AM  7 years agoPost 2582
McKrackin

rrProfessor

Lucasville,Ohio

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Everyone needs to study up a little on the differences between a movie about someone and a documentary about them.

One is a story and the other uses documented and proven information to describe a person.

Neither can be trusted though.They are always going to be perverted by the story teller.

Not even an auto-biography is going to be 100% accurate.Not even close.lol....

I literally never use the word literally right.

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR
12-27-2010 10:28 PM  7 years agoPost 2583
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4082024...ence/?gt1=43001

theres a new discovery. Probably of ancestors we already know about as its not that old.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 03:06 AM  7 years agoPost 2584
tripergreenfeet

rrApprentice

SA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2...species-siberia

This discovery of a new human species from Siberia was announced last March.

Logo 550SX, Uvular Logo 600SE, TT E820

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 04:20 AM  7 years agoPost 2585
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

This discovery of a new human species from Siberia was announced last March.
good link

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 02:59 PM  7 years agoPost 2586
RCHSF

rrKey Veteran

NC

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

A finger bone! They will build it a whlole family from this one bone in a few days. She had seven children, and her husband was actually her brother.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 04:50 PM  7 years agoPost 2587
spaceman spiff

rrKey Veteran

Tucson

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Ahhhh! The missing finger of Achemedes! ( inventor of base 9 mathematics)

(or not)

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 06:22 PM  7 years agoPost 2588
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

this is a classic creationist mistake.

science didnt created nebraska man from a tooth your wrong about that your lack of history is evident LOL

The media created nebraska man did the drawings and made it known. It was media that made nebraska man to sell papers.

science did no such thing.

Its great that on a yearly basis more and more evidence emerges to fill in the missing pieces of the puzzle.

The overall picture is still clear and you can laugh all you want because your grandkids will know the truth despite how stubborn you are to the truth

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 06:53 PM  7 years agoPost 2589
spaceman spiff

rrKey Veteran

Tucson

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

From one of your posts on the subject of Nebraska "man":
Many authorities gave Osborn their support. Based on this single tooth, reconstructions of the Nebraska man's head and body were drawn. Moreover, Nebraska man was even pictured along with his wife and children, as a whole family in a natural setting.
I noticed you removed the content of that post after i started quoting it. Seems to me there was a section about a guy questioning the wisdom of creating a creature based on a tooth, but he was squelched by - the "scientific" comunity. Too bad you removed it, was fun stuff.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 07:21 PM  7 years agoPost 2590
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I read it wrong and thought the discovery was of heidleburgensis

ill admit mistakes unlike most of you

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 07:24 PM  7 years agoPost 2591
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

spaceman you cant pull your information from a creationist website since they deal with a myth and expect it to be accurate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebraska_Man

theres the link to my source

An illustration of H. haroldcookii was done by artist Amedee Forestier, who modeled the drawing on the proportions of "Pithecanthropus" (now Homo erectus), the "Java ape-man", for the Illustrated London News. Osborn was not impressed with the illustration, calling it: "a figment of the imagination of no scientific value, and undoubtedly inaccurate".

that is the truth right there

poor try on your part, wanna try again

I love it when creationist make fools of thereselves digging up a 85 year old mistake

Although the identity of H. haroldcookii did not achieve general acceptance in the scientific community

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 07:34 PM  7 years agoPost 2592
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

if you go back and knew what you or any creationist was talking about.

you would find allot of stuff to pick on with tripergreenfeets link

its stating that homo sapiens lived 400,000 years ago.

If true it would turn evolution of homo sapiens upside down as they only go back to 200,000 years.

So far though you have a creationist who made the find and is on your side and reporting for you.

you dont even know what evidence is on your side or the other

I know its on my side because eventually science will sort it all out and the guessing will soon be over.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 07:45 PM  7 years agoPost 2593
spaceman spiff

rrKey Veteran

Tucson

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I love it when creationist make fools of thereselves digging up a 85 year old mistake
From a Pig's tooth, 40 years of proof.

THAT is embarassing. ..and as we can see from the recent finger find, nothing much has changed.

I noticed Lucy and her kind were retracted from your "family" tree. too bad.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 08:04 PM  7 years agoPost 2594
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

From a Pig's tooth, 40 years of proof.
what are you talking about?

that happemed in 1925 and debunked by science in 1927
THAT is embarassing.
no its not, creationist are the ones that hold on tightly to this becaus ethe media blew it out of porportion.
and as we can see from the finger find, nothing much has changed.
how so??? there not claiming anything other then they found a finger lol
I noticed Lucy and her kind were retracted from your "family" tree. too bad
how so? I only posted the homo species and left ardi and lucy alone.

nothing has changed, they still are our long lost ancestors.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 08:05 PM  7 years agoPost 2595
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Do you want to argue facts or create them as you wish?

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 09:08 PM  7 years agoPost 2596
spaceman spiff

rrKey Veteran

Tucson

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Whats to argue about?

There are a bunch of old bones, those are facts.

Everythng else, Evolution or Creation is just assumptions about how those bones came to be. You don't acknowledge that simple fact, so there realy is nothing to discuss IMHO.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 09:43 PM  7 years agoPost 2597
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

No you cannot accept evolution is not an assumption at all.

it is observed facts, end of story.

there is no debate about evolution. Only those in denial of facts.

creation is a myth with no evidence and its OUTLAWED for a reason

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 10:12 PM  7 years agoPost 2598
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

there is no debate about evolution. Only those in denial of facts.

creation is a myth with no evidence and its OUTLAWED for a reason
OUTLAWED !! ?????

Definition of OUTLAW
transitive verb
1
a : to deprive of the benefit and protection of law : declare to be an outlaw b : to make illegal <outlawed dueling>
2
: to place under a ban or restriction
3
: to remove from legal jurisdiction or enforcement
— out·law·ry \ˈau̇t-ˌlȯr-ē\ noun
See outlaw defined for English-language learners »
Examples of OUTLAW

1. That type of gun was outlawed last year.
2. The government passed a bill outlawing the hiring of children under the age of 12.

Show us the law big guy !!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 11:51 PM  7 years agoPost 2599
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

There are a bunch of old bones, those are facts.
You have to take into account where all these bones are found, and how old they are. Without exception, fossilised bones of primitive creatures are found in older rocks, fossils of more advanced creatures are found in younger rock. So fossils aren't just a bunch of bones, they provide a timeline that proves the evolution of every living thing, is fact.

To believe otherwise, requires faith.

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
12-28-2010 11:55 PM  7 years agoPost 2600
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

You have to take into account where all these bones are found, and how old they are. Without exception, fossilised bones of primitive creatures are found in older rocks, fossils of more advanced creatures are found in younger rock. So fossils aren't just a bunch of bones, they provide a timeline that proves the evolution of every living thing, is fact.
But, its NOT fact that evolution is the beginnings of man.

Has not been proven. Never has. Never will.
To believe otherwise, requires faith.
Nothing wrong with that.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
WATCH
 711 pages [ <<    <     129     ( 130 )     131     NEXT    >> ] 321462 views TOPIC CLOSED
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › God Did Create Mankind.
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 30  Topic Subscribe

Friday, August 17 - 8:26 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online