RunRyder RC
WATCH
 1 page 418 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › The Senate’s Goldman Kabuki
04-28-2010 09:30 PM  8 years agoPost 1
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The Senate’s Goldman Kabuki

Posted April 28th, 2010 at 9:38am

The New York Times reports this morning, “Politicians like nothing more than a convenient foil, and Democrats locked in a stubborn impasse with Republicans over new rules to govern Wall Street believe they have found a gold-plated one in Goldman Sachs. Democrats say the convergence of their push for an overhaul of financial regulation and a prominent federal securities case against the prestigious investment firm is a matter of coincidence, not planning.” Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) added: “If the disclosures at these hearings are not the final nail that persuades the American people to demand this be done now, I don’t know what would be.”

But the big problem for the leftist majorities in Congress is that the American people just don’t believe that Washington has any idea about why the financial crisis happened or how to regulate our financial system. According to Rasmussen Reports, 64% of Americans are not confident that policymakers in Washington know what they’re doing when addressing the current economic problems on Wall Street. Intent on proving his ignorance of how finance works, Dorgan went on to say: “To bet against your clients, to bet against your country, all for the sake of big profits. The timing is serendipitous but it should increase the pressure on Republicans.” Is Dorgan for real? Does he really believe that anyone who did not blindly keep inflating the housing bubble was “betting against your country”? Is it now unpatriotic to believe that housing prices cannot infinitely rise?

The left would have us believe that the 2008 financial crisis was all the fault of greedy Wall Street bankers like those at Goldman Sachs who dared to change their investment strategy on the belief that housing prices were inflated. To protect against future financial meltdowns, the left wants to give more power to the same federal regulators who failed to recognize the systemic risk caused by the very bubble Goldman and others correctly identified. In fact, one of the main reasons for yesterday’s hearing was to deflect attention away from Washington’s role in creating the 2008 financial crisis.

It was the government-created and subsidized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that played leading roles in the markets at the center of the housing storm. But the left prioritized their political goals over financial reality. Rep. Barney Frank told the House Financial Services Committee: “These two entities–Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac–are not facing any kind of financial crisis,” and “[t]he more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.” And the author of thievery financial reform bill currently being debated in the Senate, Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) , told CNN in July of 2008: “To suggest somehow that [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] are in trouble is simply not accurate.” Just two months later, completely overrun by bad debt, both companies were placed in conservatorship.

So unable to acknowledge the government’s role in the last crisis, not only were Fannie and Freddie not mentioned at yesterday’s hearing, they are not included in Dodd’s financial regulation bill at all. Hence the need for a villain like Goldman.

From The Heritage Foundation:
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/04/28...=Morning%2BBell

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-28-2010 10:43 PM  8 years agoPost 2
steve9534

rrKey Veteran

yakima, wa.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Goldman Sachs
It's not unpatriotic to identify that a bubble exists. It is unethical, whether or not it's illegal, to sell securities they believed were doomed to failure w/o disclosing that fact. They then placed bets that the securities would fail. It would be very enlightening to hear what the buyers of those securities were told when they bought them. One can be sure that the Goldman execs weren't telling their clients that they believed those purchases would lose billions for the buyers. Whether or not Fannie and Freddie are doing OK is irrelevant as to whether Goldman acted honestly and honorably and seems to have been placed in the article only to obscure the real issue. I don't have the slightest confidence that our senators have any idea how to correct our financial problems either, but if I were an investor, I sure wouldn't be willing to trust Goldman with my money. I also don't believe that doing dishonest deals that cost unwitting investors billions doesn't have any effect on the economy. steve

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-28-2010 10:56 PM  8 years agoPost 3
csc

rrApprentice

Cave Creek, AZ

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Their posturing is working. They have you more concerned about Goldman and evil Wall St. than Fannie and Freddie. I still can't believe that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd are not in jail.

______________________
eShuttles

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-29-2010 12:12 AM  8 years agoPost 4
dilberteinstein

rrNovice

texas - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Their posturing is working. They have you more concerned about Goldman and evil Wall St. than Fannie and Freddie. I still can't believe that Barney Frank and Chris Dodd are not in jail.
You, my friend, have hit the nail on the head.

This is exactly what the illusionist does with the little thing known as misdirection.

90% of life is "showing up"

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 418 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › The Senate’s Goldman Kabuki
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 4  Topic Subscribe

Thursday, August 16 - 7:22 pm - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online