RunRyder RC
WATCH
 1 page 560 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Obama’s False START
04-08-2010 04:31 PM  8 years agoPost 1
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Obama’s False START

Posted April 8th, 2010 at 9:24am

Obama and Medvedev sign new START

Just hours before President Barack Obama unveiled his Nuclear Posture Review (NPR) on Tuesday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told reporters in Moscow that the Kremlin maintained the right to withdraw from the new START agreement if the United States pursued its missile defense program. Late last night, the White House responded to Lavrov’s statement, insisting: “The Russian statement does no more than give the United States fair notice that it may decide to pull out of the New START Treaty if Russia believes our missile defense system affects strategic stability. We believe it doesn’t.”

But the Russians could care less what the Obama administration believes about missile defense. The Russians have made it exceedingly clear that Kremlin compliance with the treaty will evaporate at any point when Moscow decides our missile defense program threatens them. And the Russians have already said repeatedly that they believe it does. There is a good reason that neither Russian President Dmitri Medvedev nor Prime Minister Vladimir Putin have uttered a word about the treaty in public. As New York University professor of Russian Studies and History Stephen Cohen told MSNBC just seconds after Presidents Obama and Medvedev signed the agreement: “Politically it is an unstable treaty.” Why should the U.S. Senate ratify a treaty that Russia maintains it can exit at any time?

President Obama’s New START has other problems as well. The Russians have a long and well documented history of violating arms control agreements. By focusing intently on numerical arms reduction, it is unclear what ground Obama gave up on verification. There is also legitimate concern that the President has not yet met requirements under U.S. law (sec 1251 of the 2009 Defense Authorization Act) to adequately address the modernization of U.S. nuclear weapons and infrastructure before entering into a new arms control agreement. But President Obama’s NPR promises not to develop any new nuclear weapons. That’s an odd promise since Russia, China, India, Pakistan, Iran and North Korea are all doing so.

Taken together, New Start, the NPR and next week’s Nuclear Security Summit all raise significant questions about the soundness of the administration’s nuclear strategy. The President has made it clear that he sees the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty as the core of U.S. nuclear policy. But maintaining an effective nuclear force that protects the United States and its allies and combating proliferation and nuclear terrorism are not incompatible, as the President’s strategy suggests. The last administration made significant strides in countering proliferation, including establishing the Proliferation Security Initiative.

It is President Obama’s nuclear strategy that is contradictory. By having a smaller, less reliable, less credible nuclear force, the President’s strategy will increase the incentive for nuclear proliferators and the reliance of other states on nuclear weapons — the world will become a more, not less dangerous place. As The Wall Street Journal reminds us today: “To the extent that more states haven’t gone nuclear, the reason has been U.S. power, not a treaty. Japan, Taiwan, South Korea and Canada could build a bomb in a week, but instead they have long relied on America’s nuclear umbrella to deter aggressors. A credible U.S. nuclear deterrent is the world’s greatest antiproliferation weapon.”

The right U.S. defense strategy would emphasize a modernized, credible nuclear force; comprehensive missile defense; and robust conventional forces, as well as vigorous efforts to prevent proliferation, illicit trafficking in nuclear technology and materials; and combating terrorism. This will provide for a more robust and effective deterrence for the post-Cold War World

From The Heritage Foundation:
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/04/08...=Morning%2BBell

My Comments: The most dangerous thing the USA has ever faced is to have a far lefty loon in charge of national security. We can only be thankful he will not be there any more than 4 years.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-09-2010 04:06 AM  8 years agoPost 2
drdot

rrElite Veteran

So. California, Orange County.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

fwiw....

Charles Krauthammer has an interesting piece on this.Look it up on UTube..You may not always agree with the Krautster, but he is anything but stupid....

BC

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-09-2010 04:19 PM  8 years agoPost 3
ScottV

rrApprentice

El Dorado Hills, CA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Atleast he is trying to do something, would you have rather he did nothing with Russia at all?

Basically he is damned if he does or doesn't do something.

So long and thanks for all the fish!
`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-09-2010 04:28 PM  8 years agoPost 4
SSN Pru

rrElite Veteran

Taxachusetts

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

what good is 'doing something' when what you are doing is 'nothing'?

explain that to me please, scott.

Stupidity can be cured. Ignorance is for life!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-09-2010 05:14 PM  8 years agoPost 5
Hivoltage

rrApprentice

Ohio

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

For starters...we are not the ones Russia needs to be concerned about. And it is stupid for us to give up any defensive weapons.

I Dont Have No Stink'in Signature

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-09-2010 05:22 PM  8 years agoPost 6
fla heli boy

rrElite Veteran

cape coral, florida

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

the only thing we're doing wrong is putting them in the wrong places and aiming them at the wrong people.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-09-2010 08:26 PM  8 years agoPost 7
ScottV

rrApprentice

El Dorado Hills, CA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

what good is 'doing something' when what you are doing is 'nothing'?

explain that to me please, scott.
Here is what I have found out:
Once ratified by both country's governments, each will have to limit their deployed strategic warheads to 1,550 - 30% lower than previously - and the number of deployed "launchers" to no more than 700.

That is something.

So long and thanks for all the fish!
`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.. ><((((º>`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><((((º>

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-09-2010 09:04 PM  8 years agoPost 8
Hivoltage

rrApprentice

Ohio

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

And that is going to help who? Iran and N. Korea?

I Dont Have No Stink'in Signature

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-09-2010 11:23 PM  8 years agoPost 9
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Once ratified by both country's governments, each will have to limit their deployed strategic warheads to 1,550 - 30% lower than previously - and the number of deployed "launchers" to no more than 700.
The number of them is really not the point here. We have enough, even at 1500, to cause some very serious damage.

The point here, in my mind, is when you tell an enemy he can use biological weapons on us and we will not nuke them when the policy was just the opposite before Obama got his fingers on it, that is weakening our position with an enemy. Our enemies are laughing at us.

As a US citizen, that really pisses me off. We are supposed to be negotiating these things from a point of strength, not weakness.

President Reagan once said: “If you can’t make them see the light, then make them feel the heat.”

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 560 views POST REPLY
HomeOff Topics News & Politics › Obama’s False START
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 3  Topic Subscribe

Thursday, October 18 - 3:22 pm - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

The RC discussion world needs to consolidate. RR is now one choice for that. Its software is cutting edge. It hosts on-topic advertising. Help RR increase traffic buy making suggestions, posting in RR's new areas (sites) and by spreading the word.

The RunRyder Difference

• Category system to allow Rep/Vendor postings.
• Classifieds with sold (hidden) category.
• Classifieds with separate view new.
• Answer PMs offsite via email reply.
• Member gallery photos with advanced scripting.
• Gallery photo viewer integrated into postings.
• Highly refined search with advanced back end.
• Hosts its own high end fast response servers.
• Hosts thousands of HD event coverage videos.
• Rewrote entire code base with latest technology.
• No off-topic (annoying) click bait advertising.
Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online