RunRyder RC
WATCH
 2 pages [ <<    <     1     ( 2 )    >    >> ] 2050 views POST REPLY
HomeAircraftHelicopterAlignT-REX 700N › New Design or Defective Part? Metal tail rotor control arm from align.
04-20-2009 11:42 PM  9 years agoPost 21
Anthony.L

rrElite Veteran

Seattle, WA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Again, before I had ever posted the vendor said it was a defect. Without mine in front of me, I dont know if it should be that way or not.

Indeed, looking at ChrisC pic. It looks like it should be there. Even though the vendor said its a defect.
You can spin it anyway you want, bottom line is your believed what one person on the internet said second hand. That was your fault to fall down that rabbit hole. News flash, 50% or more of the stuff you read on the internet is not accurate, even more so on forums.

The "vendor" was incorrect, and you blindly followed them.
IMHO all this part is going to do is accelerate wear of the ball on the pitch arm. Unless it has a plastic sleeve or something to protect it. The metal on metal contact will greatly shorten the life of the ball.
That remains to be seen, I'm skeptical but running one of my 600N and will keep a close eye on it to see if that's the case.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-20-2009 11:59 PM  9 years agoPost 22
spdntckt

rrApprentice

San Jose, CA USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

what is the benefit of this metal arm? would seem to wear the balls even faster than plastic no?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-21-2009 12:53 AM  9 years agoPost 23
baddynergy

rrElite Veteran

sierra madre, ca- usa

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

You can spin it anyway you want, bottom line is your believed what one person on the internet said second hand. That was your fault to fall down that rabbit hole. News flash, 50% or more of the stuff you read on the internet is not accurate, even more so on forums.
WRONG

I blindly followed NOONE. I went to Aligns website to look at the part. It is NOT what is depicted, therefore the part is defective. If Align has updated the part, post a new pic. You yourself are "blindly" following someone elses assumption that the part is correct as you have no first hand experience with it.

I have been through my share of align links. With the plastic arm they wear out in 50 flights, it can only be worse with metal on metal.

**Unattended children will be givin a shot of espresso and a puppy**

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-21-2009 03:27 AM  9 years agoPost 24
TmMugen

rrKey Veteran

Tiny Little Red Dot aka Singapore

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Hey guys..Maybe we can just stop the speculation until the vendor send me the replacement.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-21-2009 04:51 AM  9 years agoPost 25
jphilli

rrKey Veteran

Atlanta, Ga.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

News flash, 50% or more of the stuff you read on the internet is not accurate, even more so on forums.
Is anyone else sensing a paradox here?

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
04-23-2009 04:32 AM  9 years agoPost 26
TmMugen

rrKey Veteran

Tiny Little Red Dot aka Singapore

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Just an update:

I just got the part from the vendor last night. Damm quick replacement..!!

Final vedict: defective part sent the first time. I think Align have done it again.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-23-2009 05:24 AM  9 years agoPost 27
RayoVac

rrVeteran

raptor4ever is a THIEF!!!

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

So does the new replacement part fit and operate with NO binding?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-23-2009 06:56 AM  9 years agoPost 28
xxcysxx

rrKey Veteran

Baltimore, MD - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

dude, i think they've just sended you a new defective part.

Tam

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
04-23-2009 01:15 PM  9 years agoPost 29
red_z06

rrProfessor

Dumont, NJ

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Align accidentally packaged the lightened version targeted for the pro pilots. So, it was easy for them to say it was defective rather than to explain the existence of such item. That item is not supposed to survive a crash so it is labeled as "One crash only"

It was engineered with FEA to withstand the vigorous tail use but to break on impact.

www.JustinJee.com

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-25-2009 03:22 AM  9 years agoPost 30
buzzsaw

rrElite Veteran

Southeast USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Dude,I like the other one better,It had caaaaaaraaaactor!!!

SkySpy Aerial Video

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-25-2009 03:36 AM  9 years agoPost 31
ckd

rrApprentice

Saugus CA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I have the other one and like Chris shows it would hit the tail rotor gear box without that notch. It is also flipped from the way the plastic one is mounted. Works fine on mine.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
04-25-2009 01:35 PM  9 years agoPost 32
Jerry K

rrKey Veteran

Houston Area

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

[quote]I went to Aligns website to look at the part. It is NOT what is depicted, therefore the part is defective. If Align has updated the part, post a new pic.

Actualy thats exactly what they did. If you notice the two Align pictures are different and the second picture matches the replacment part.

Jerry

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-25-2009 02:50 PM  9 years agoPost 33
lightningrc

rrElite Veteran

UK

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Find it hard to beleive they put a notch in it on purpose .

Ive just received mine and it has no notch and has plenty of clearance.

My Theory is that they cocked up the first batch and found they were hitting the tail gearbox so they just milled a notch out .

Then on the second lot they corrected the problem.

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-25-2009 05:09 PM  9 years agoPost 34
Anthony.L

rrElite Veteran

Seattle, WA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Did you guys not pay attention to what Benny Chi posted...

"Align accidentally packaged the lightened version targeted for the pro pilots. So, it was easy for them to say it was defective rather than to explain the existence of such item. That item is not supposed to survive a crash so it is labeled as "One crash only""

Mystery solved!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-25-2009 05:40 PM  9 years agoPost 35
red_z06

rrProfessor

Dumont, NJ

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

LOL

It was a clear cut machining error. If it was intended for a clearance (not an after thought) then the material would've had a hump on the opposite side to maintain minimum thickness for rigidity and design integrity.

Anthony. L

Sorry If I missled you.

I thought I worded it carefully so not to be taken seriously.

www.JustinJee.com

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-25-2009 05:43 PM  9 years agoPost 36
lightningrc

rrElite Veteran

UK

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Anthony.L do you believe every thing ? I promise you they would not have made a lighter one.
It was a first run error !!!! , they had probably made about a million before they realised , so altered them rather than binning .

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
04-25-2009 09:47 PM  9 years agoPost 37
baddynergy

rrElite Veteran

sierra madre, ca- usa

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

You can spin it anyway you want, bottom line is your believed what one person on the internet said second hand. That was your fault to fall down that rabbit hole. News flash, 50% or more of the stuff you read on the internet is not accurate, even more so on forums.

The "vendor" was incorrect, and you blindly followed them.
Imaginge that, the vendor was correct. Who blindly followed whom?
It was a first run error !!!! , they had probably made about a million before they realised , so altered them rather than binning .
In other words, it was a defect that they covered up with minor machining and sold anyway. So its a working defect but a defect none the less.

**Unattended children will be givin a shot of espresso and a puppy**

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 2 pages [ <<    <     1     ( 2 )    >    >> ] 2050 views POST REPLY
HomeAircraftHelicopterAlignT-REX 700N › New Design or Defective Part? Metal tail rotor control arm from align.
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 10  Topic Subscribe

Thursday, October 18 - 1:50 am - Copyright © 2000-2018 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

The RC discussion world needs to consolidate. RR is now one choice for that. Its software is cutting edge. It hosts on-topic advertising. Help RR increase traffic buy making suggestions, posting in RR's new areas (sites) and by spreading the word.

The RunRyder Difference

• Category system to allow Rep/Vendor postings.
• Classifieds with sold (hidden) category.
• Classifieds with separate view new.
• Answer PMs offsite via email reply.
• Member gallery photos with advanced scripting.
• Gallery photo viewer integrated into postings.
• Highly refined search with advanced back end.
• Hosts its own high end fast response servers.
• Hosts thousands of HD event coverage videos.
• Rewrote entire code base with latest technology.
• No off-topic (annoying) click bait advertising.
Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online