RunRyder RC
 9  Topic Subscribe
WATCH
 2 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2     NEXT    >> ] 1072 views
HelicopterMain Discussion › old fm radios
11-21-2017 03:46 AM  21 days agoPost 1
eyeflyhelis

rrElite Veteran

charlotte nc

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

anybody still using them, if so what for? does it seem like there is less interference now that most people have gone to 2.4g?
This weekend i took my last FM/ PCM radio out of a heli. been flying 2.4g since it came out but never swapped over my raptor 50 helicopter. just took my jr 8130 pcm out. thinking about selling or trading it but i know i wont get much value for it so i was looking for some else to do with it.

only you have the power to make no difference!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 03:55 AM  21 days agoPost 2
EEngineer

rrProfessor

TX

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Because people don't have money to spend to upgrade....and they still work due to FCC regs.

There are also collectors that would be more than happy to have your old FM radio systems....and might even buy them for a small sum.

FWIW

Logo 600SXs, 800XX, TDR IIs

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 03:57 AM  21 days agoPost 3
InvertedDude

rrApprentice

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

eyeflyhelis

Use your FM for long range FVP. 2.4 ghz doesn't go as far as an FM will go in open skies. Anyone correct me if I am wrong?

I like your JR 8103! I had one, I sold it to upgrade. Dumb on my end!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 04:12 AM  21 days agoPost 4
EEngineer

rrProfessor

TX

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

FM has an unusual characteristic called "capture ratio".

Which is a measure of how well an FM RX will "lock" onto an FM TX.

Whereas, with AM transmission, you have all experienced...while driving...that you can "hear" several weak AM radio stations at one time.

So, AM will provide max range...lol(more interference)....FM perhaps 2nd...with 2.4 Wifi a distant 3rd....

All depending upon the type of Tx and Rx antenna system used.

In general

FWIW

Logo 600SXs, 800XX, TDR IIs

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 04:23 AM  21 days agoPost 5
ICUR1-2

rrElite Veteran

Ottawa, Ontario

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I would trust FM in a foamy or an fpv drone

fm goes through buildings easier than 2.4
As for range that depends on system tx/rx.

Long range fpv uses uhf ~ 30 Km vs 2.4 ~ 3Km.
I never looked into fm as I started at the same time as spektrum.

spending time, paying attention

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 04:30 AM  21 days agoPost 6
EEngineer

rrProfessor

TX

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I don't "trust" anything....or anybody....without knowing about the situation....

That was an odd recommendation....LOL

Logo 600SXs, 800XX, TDR IIs

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 05:18 AM  21 days agoPost 7
spaceman spiff

rrKey Veteran

Tucson

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I just picked up a couple old JR 6102s for just over 20$ each on e bay. Not fancy, but one of my old favorites. Still work great, and most of my planes already have the recievers for it... Every bit as much fun now as it was 10 or 12 years ago. Folks pay a bit more for your 8 channel.

I picked up a Futaba T8FG. in 2.4Ghz FAST tech a few years back. Good stuff, but It is also outdated now.

Nothing wrong with the old stuff if it is doing what you need it to. Check or replace the battery if you decide to continue to use it.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 05:41 AM  21 days agoPost 8
EEngineer

rrProfessor

TX

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Usually the TX batteries are the issue.

Just keep the original battery plug...because it's easy to obtain
a suitable replacement battery....but the plug can be harder to find.

Just solder the old plug wires on the new batt pack wires....

Logo 600SXs, 800XX, TDR IIs

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 06:01 AM  21 days agoPost 9
eyeflyhelis

rrElite Veteran

charlotte nc

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I never realized that fam had a better range. I have flown by 2.4 9103 and 9303 S as far as I could see I never had an issue. That being said back in the day with my old 347 X and then my 8103 I did the same thing so I never considered range to be an issue.
Currently I also have a DJI mavic Pro which I fly 1950 ft away according to the screen and that's to boil for that I can't even see that and never had an issue.

only you have the power to make no difference!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 06:08 AM  21 days agoPost 10
eyeflyhelis

rrElite Veteran

charlotte nc

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I just looked on eBay and there is a lot of 8103 radios on there and people are trying to get $350 for them but none of them have any bids. I have to dig through my stuff I'm pretty sure I have a 9103 FM radio someplace, I'll hold on to that one that was one of my favorite reviews thanks for the advice guys

only you have the power to make no difference!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 06:46 AM  21 days agoPost 11
EEngineer

rrProfessor

TX

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

1950 feet is less than 4/10's of a mile....

The current altitude record...set by Maynard Hill...using AM is around 30,000 feet....

Logo 600SXs, 800XX, TDR IIs

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 01:13 PM  20 days agoPost 12
ICUR1-2

rrElite Veteran

Ottawa, Ontario

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Ahh much better with out all the useless posts.

spending time, paying attention

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 03:53 PM  20 days agoPost 13
helitom

rrApprentice

Pine Grove, Calif, USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

As to value - they have virtually none. Looking on Ebay, as I frequently do, the old FM/PCM radios get listed with starting bids of 0.99 cents. They most often get zero bidders.

Oh yeah, I still fly two Futaba 9Z's with the FASST RF modules in foamys, gliders, ect... All my helis have new Futaba systems. All the other old stuff got deposited in the green filing cabinet that is located just outside my garage and gets emptied out once a week.

The older I get, the fewer things seem worth waiting in line for.

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 05:15 PM  20 days agoPost 14
870heli

rrVeteran

Monson Ma. USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

I loved the 8103 back in the day. I like everyone am flying 2.4 now.
In last weeks I have been getting hopped up on having some old classic heli's. I picked up two new old heli's and a new JR 783 radio that I am going to use to fly they with. Just for fun. I never thought that I would be buying FM's ever again.
Hind sight tells me I would keep it for what you can sell them for.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 05:49 PM  20 days agoPost 15
eyeflyhelis

rrElite Veteran

charlotte nc

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

helitom
All the other old stuff got deposited in the green filing cabinet that is located just outside my garage and gets emptied out once a week.
That only happens after a rough day usually. And I hate those days

only you have the power to make no difference!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 05:51 PM  20 days agoPost 16
eyeflyhelis

rrElite Veteran

charlotte nc

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

30000 feet!!!!!!! :0 heck I never thought that was possible with a radio. He must have have one hell of a good set of binoculars

only you have the power to make no difference!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 05:54 PM  20 days agoPost 17
eyeflyhelis

rrElite Veteran

charlotte nc

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

870heli
Hind sight tells me I would keep it for what you can sell them for.
I threw it up on the trade for him to see if anybody would bite on a trade for a 600 or 700 mm carbon fiber blades. I do have a few guys interested. But I look for my 9103 last night and then realized I had a 9303. So I'm going to keep that one and a couple of our 700 receivers for it

only you have the power to make no difference!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 06:30 PM  20 days agoPost 18
EEngineer

rrProfessor

TX

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

30000 feet
Google Maynard Hill...

Of course, his TX was connected via a coaxial cable to a Yagi antenna system....which is a form of directional antenna.

He was also using a telescope to view his aircraft.

He also had permission from the FAA to perform this feat.....

Among the difficulties was to keep the avionic equipment working....due to the intense cold at altitude. So he had to use a heating system within his aircraft, which "ate" into his power budget.

Another famous feat that Hill accomplished was to fly across the Atlantic Ocean.....nonstop....using an autopilot system that he developed.

FWIW

Logo 600SXs, 800XX, TDR IIs

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
11-21-2017 06:50 PM  20 days agoPost 19
Pistol Pete

rrProfessor

Seffner, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

old fm radios

anybody still using them, if so what for?
JR8103 demoted to SIM duty and yes! it can handle a 3S LiPo.

Sadly they dont do well with a gasser heli and mainly why I migrated (and not upgraded) to 2.4GHz.

As for range, the higher the frequency, the shorter the distance.

72MHz range can be as far as 5 miles LOS and forgiving around buildings at much shorter distances unlike 2.4GHz which is shorter than 1.5 miles if not mistaken and going around a building is going to be a quest. That plus 72MHz radios output are as high as one watts versus 2.4GHz at one tenth of a watt.

72MHz signal degrades and your model will act weird and or glitch while 2.4GHz has fail safe and you wont even know you are not in control unless you programmed something unusual to happen other than keeping last know signal. So if you happen to be flying a straight line away from you and lose signal, good luck.

Downside to 72MHz is its prone to interference by someone else in same channel unlike 2.4GHz which not only has channel hopping but now has model match and will only respond to one radio.

So if you keep your 72MHz, you can have your cake and eat it too.

~~Enjoying the hobby one flight at a time~~

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  BLOGAttn:RR  Quote
11-22-2017 12:07 AM  20 days agoPost 20
jharkin

rrApprentice

Holliston, MA - USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

It seems like AM/FM/PCM radio have now been put in the same category as nicad batteies and analog servos with newbies convinced that their heli will crash if they tried to use it ...

[this forum needs a facepalm smiley]
ICUR1-2
I would trust FM in a foamy or an fpv drone
...
I never looked into fm as I started at the same time as spektrum.
FM will work just fine in any model you want to use it in, no reason to be scared of it. Its a well proven technology we have used forever in RC... the only major downside is that its not spread spectrum.
eyeflyhelis
30000 feet!!!!!!! :0 heck I never thought that was possible with a radio. He must have have one hell of a good set of binoculars
I'm missing some replies due to having some annoying members on block. I assume you are referring to Maynard Hill's altitude record. They used high power naval binoculars on a tracking mount, along with radar to follow it.

BTW, that was in 1971 and I'm pretty sure it was AM radio , not FM. Old Kraft and Cirrus sets.

https://www.dmfv.aero/files/Flying-Models-Jan-1971.pdf
Pistol Pete
Sadly they dont do well with a gasser heli and mainly why I migrated (and not upgraded) to 2.4GHz.
???? FM works just fine on gas. I flew FM and PCM on gas airplanes for years and years... never had a single problem so long as you know how to properly isolate the receiver from the ignition.

The main advantages of 2.4 are spread spectrum (no worries about freq pins and shoot downs) and the increased bandwidth that allowed us to move beyond the 9 channel limitation of AM/FM/PCM.

-Jeremy
Whiplash-G
Helix 700G
T-Rex 450 fbl conversion
alot of planks

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 2 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2     NEXT    >> ] 1072 views
HelicopterMain Discussion › old fm radios
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 9  Topic Subscribe

Tuesday, December 12 - 8:33 am - Copyright © 2000-2017 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online