Have I ever supported the London mayor? No, I called him a c0cksucker for that comment because he's a filthy c@nt and won't do what it's necessary. He shouldn't BE in that position anyway.
I'll remember that next time your attacked. What was it you London mayor said. Oh yea " he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city”
That's what I call dealing with the issue...............
You haven't bothered to read what I wrote previously.
Your kidding right? I don't believe a thing the media here says. If I did I'd be singing to them and giving them hugs as you do in England. I see how you guys deal with this electing the left. Get ready for trouble because more is coming.
and why would you think I subscribe to this "hugs. holding hands, candlelit vigils" thing?
You must have me mistaken for someone else or you don't understand me at all.
Not all need to be eliminated just the radicals.
no, you don't get it.
And this comment SHOWS you don't get it at all.
Keep on saying the word "radical" and then for a moment, if you are bothered but knowing you I'd say you won't bother, read the Queeran and the Hadiths, and learn about the life of their filthy prophet, and THEN you can tell me who is radical! Because that shows your utter ignorance. There is NOTHING the "radicals" have done that their prophet DID NOT DO. Get that? Their prophet is the definitive radical.
Which is why, when the "radicals" take over the "moderates" (even when the "moderates" as you say outnumber them 100 to 1), the "moderates" will submit and fall into the "radicals"'s line. The "radicals" are NOT the problem, they are merely the symptoms.