RunRyder RC
 30  Topic Subscribe
WATCH
 711 pages [ <<    <     371     ( 372 )     373     NEXT    >> ] 314755 views TOPIC CLOSED
HelicopterOff Topics News & Politics › God Did Create Mankind.
08-02-2011 09:22 AM  6 years agoPost 7421
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

You really should try to remember what we've already covered.
..............

a·the·ist
   [ey-thee-ist] Show IPA
noun
a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.
Explain, in your spin, how its possible a new born baby can either deny or disbelieve in a supreme being or being.
At long last you have realised what the word ''or'' means. That took you long enough.

Are you able to explain how looking up dictionaries to show you what words you yourself use mean, is ''spin'', or is this accusation yet another example of your intellectual dishonesty? (and I use the word ''intellectual'' very loosely)

Yet again, we have already covered this. You'll have to do better than this to have a hope of understanding. well, anything really.

Go back and look at the definition of ''disbelieve'' and tell us which part of ''unable'' you do not understand.
Tell you what dusty. You are such a fan of Wikipedia. Lets settle this once and for all. You are aware of Wikipedia's policy of letting anyone post or add to their definitions or explanations there. You also mentioned at one time that bogus information on their web site gets purged from their regularly.
So, you now say that wikipedia can ''settle it for once and for all'', after telling us how much you distrust them?

How much more intellectually dishonest could you possibly be?

Wikipedia is for people who already have a basic knowledge of the English language. Most of us already know that babies are human beings. If you really expect that to have to be explained to you, I suggest you start off somewhere that doesn't treat you like an adult. I'm not going to waste my time editing wiki, just because you cannot understand it, when the vast majority of folk already can. Or, perhaps you are correct and most folk don't know that babies are people? If you think so, you could always edit wiki yourself to find out. One thing I will tell you is that your IP will be recorded when you edit it. So perhaps you shouldn't bother, as making a fool of yourself here is bad enough, never mind doing so on wiki.
I challenge you to find any "officially recognized" definition or description of a new born baby as an atheist in exact terms, with no spin on the words.
Is this what you're reduced to now?

If you did not realise that, for example, women can be atheists, and you challenge someone to find a definition of atheist which specifically includes women, I doubt you would have much more success than you would trying to find one that specifically includes babies.

Why don't you try to find some ''officially recognised'' definition of atheist to support your blatant and outrageously dishonest attempt at spin, to try to say that babies do not count as 'people', or 'humans' when defining 'atheist'.

No wonder you earned the name DEET.

Watch at YouTube

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 09:50 AM  6 years agoPost 7422
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Go back and look at the definition of ''disbelieve'' and tell us which part of ''unable'' you do not understand.
Well golly gee whiz dusty.

I took your suggestion and looked it up once again for the zillionth time for you:

Definition of DISBELIEVE
transitive verb
: to hold not worthy of belief : not believe
intransitive verb
: to withhold or reject belief
— dis·be·liev·er noun

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/disbelieve

-----------------------------------

Now, if you would open your eye balls, and get your mind off searching for panties, you will notice what you keep leaving out in your spin:

to hold not worthy of belief
to withhold or reject belief

Those 2 sentences are once again in bold for the blind (yourself). Prove to us how a new born baby can "Hold Not Worthy Of Belief" or "Withhold Or Reject Belief". Of course, thats not possible no matter how you attempt to spin it. But, you are welcome to try just for entertainment purposes.

Maybe you have a brain dysfunction that prevents you from reading the complete definition of a word.
So, you now say that wikipedia can ''settle it for once and for all'', after telling us how much you distrust them?
There was no doubt in my mind that you could not rise to my challenge on the unreliable Wikipedia web site. You live up to my expectations. Another big fail.
If you did not realise that, for example, women can be atheists, and you challenge someone to find a definition of atheist which specifically includes women, I doubt you would have much more success than you would trying to find one that specifically includes babies.
What? Women?

When did that ever come into the conversation?

Beats me. Never brought it up myself. Why would I say women cannot be atheists? Show me in any of my posts where I have said that.
Why don't you try to find some ''officially recognised'' definition of atheist to support your blatant and outrageously dishonest attempt at spin, to try to say that babies do not count as 'people', or 'humans' when defining 'atheist'.
Never said that dusty. Why would I say that babies do not count as people. Show me in one of my posts where I said that.

You have sunk so low that you now use blatant untruths. Twice, in one post !!!!

Shame on you dusty. Instead of spending your time searching for panties, I suggest you wear diapers instead.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 11:41 AM  6 years agoPost 7423
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

DEET DE DEET

What was wrong with the first definition of 'disbelieve', from your first choice of dictionary?

You're making this harder on yourself than you have to. Why not tell us what is wrong with the definition provided by the foremost authority on the English language? If you think you've seen it before, that's because it's been posted before, a few times.

atheist
a person who does not believe in the existence of God or gods

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/atheist

Surely you can understand that. If not, which part specifically do you not understand?
Never said that dusty. Why would I say that babies do not count as people. Show me in one of my posts where I said that.
So, you are quite happy to admit that babies count as people, in the context of the above definition?
Beats me. Never brought it up myself. Why would I say women cannot be atheists? Show me in any of my posts where I have said that.
Calm down Dennis. Where did I say you did? A little more honesty on your part would go a long way.
Shame on you dusty. Instead of spending your time searching for panties, I suggest you wear diapers instead.
I suggest you get some help for this unhealthy obsession you have about other men and panties.

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 03:47 PM  6 years agoPost 7424
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

You're making this harder on yourself than you have to. Why not tell us what is wrong with the definition provided by the foremost authority on the English language?
First authority?

Who is the first authority?

You?
So, you are quite happy to admit that babies count as people, in the context of the above definition?
Of course. Already said that. Must I keep repeating things to you? I also think you are acting like a big baby.
Calm down Dennis. Where did I say you did? A little more honesty on your part would go a long way.
Right here:

quote]If you did not realise that, for example, women can be atheists, and you challenge someone to find a definition of atheist which specifically includes women, I doubt you would have much more success than you would trying to find one that specifically includes babies.[/quote]

Big baby.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 05:07 PM  6 years agoPost 7425
outhouse

rrVeteran

auburn ca

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Look either your a theist and believe what you were brainwashed from birth to believe.

or your not a theist, that is a atheist.

god is imaginary, those that dont imagine are atheist

If you leave little alter boys alone, your probably a atheist lol

If you dont murder abortion doctors, good chance you are in fact a atheist lol

Hey Dusty

come play on our roads lol

Watch at YouTube

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 05:21 PM  6 years agoPost 7426
Thomas L Erb

rrKey Veteran

Alliance ohio

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.
Dusty your basket is short a few eggs.in order to deny or disbelieve something you have to prove comprehension. With out that your cause is foolishness. To a baby the mother is a creator/god. She feeds,nourishes cares for and protects the baby exactly as God does to us (even unbelievers).

Thank you for being such an excellent example for my theory of ferhoodledism.

Wow I just invented a new ism! Kooooool! I may even make it into wicka!!!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 05:25 PM  6 years agoPost 7427
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

ferhoodledism

Almost sounds like something dirty.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 05:44 PM  6 years agoPost 7428
GREYEAGLE

rrElite Veteran

Flat Land's

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

WONDERFULL

{FERHOODELISM}

Graduate of the School w/ Honor's

Quick off to Wickamedia = A Dusty Out House

Think of this

If Christian Men are Circumcised ////

What have they done to their anatomy if they are ((Ferhoodelised)

greyeagle

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 07:56 PM  6 years agoPost 7429
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

First authority?

Who is the first authority?
England is where the English language originates, Oxford University is the top university in England, and their dictionary is widely regarded as being ''the foremost authority in English.''

My own paper copy of the Oxford dictionary also tells us that the word 'atheist' originates from the Greek word 'atheos'.

a - 'without' + theos 'god'.
Of course. Already said that. Must I keep repeating things to you?
That's funny stuff, considering it's coming from you. How many times did I need to draw your attention to the word ''or'' in the definition you posted, before you were able to understand it?

I have posted the definition from the Oxford dictionary a few times, and you have so far failed to tell us this:

Given that you accept babies are included in this definition, WHICH PART OF THIS DEFINITION DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?

atheist
a person who does not believe in the existence of God or gods

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/atheist

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 08:02 PM  6 years agoPost 7430
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Right here:

quote]If you did not realise that, for example, women can be atheists, and you challenge someone to find a definition of atheist which specifically includes women, I doubt you would have much more success than you would trying to find one that specifically includes babies.
[/quote]

Can you see the difference between these two statements?

1) ''you did not realise that women can be atheists...''

2) ''If you did not realise that women can be atheists...''

Obviously, the 2nd statement doesn't accuse you of anything, yet you once again, resort to outrageous and blatant intellectual dishonesty, and try to spin what I said to try to pretend that I said something that I did not. FAIL.

So, your accusation is completely false and unfounded, yet again. Won't you try to be just a little more honest?
Big baby.
I've heard of this adult baby thing, and I presume this is where you get your thoughts about other men in panties and diapers. I'm sure I'm not the only one here who would rather you kept such thoughts to yourself.

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 08:09 PM  6 years agoPost 7431
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Hey Dusty

come play on our roads lol
Excellent. How did you get the cars to park at the side of the road?

We have some good twisty roads here too, but not many are as quiet as that.

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 08:10 PM  6 years agoPost 7432
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Almost sounds like something dirty.
It's not surprising that's the first thought that springs to your mind.

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 08:20 PM  6 years agoPost 7433
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Dusty your basket is short a few eggs.in order to deny or disbelieve something you have to prove comprehension.
Thomas, must you try to belittle others, every time you post?

Don't you think there might be a difference between ''deny'' and ''disbelieve''? Did you spot the word ''OR''?

deny
1 [with object] state that one refuses to admit the truth or existence of

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/deny

To refuse to admit the truth or existence of something, yes I agree, you must first be able to comprehend what it is.

disbelieve
verb
[with object]
be unable to believe

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/disbelieve

To be unable to believe something, you do NOT have to be able comprehend what it is. If you are unable to comprehend something, you are unable to believe it. It's that simple. There's no need to ferhoodle yourself.
Thank you for being such an excellent example for my theory of ferhoodledism.
Says the guy who didn't even know how to spell ferhoodle, to the guy who taught him how to do so.
Wow I just invented a new ism! Kooooool! I may even make it into wicka!!!
Now you're getting ferhoodled about being ferhoodled.

If you want to add ''ism'', it would be ''ferhoodlism'', not ''ferhoodledism'', but don't go ferhoodling yourself over it.

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 09:04 PM  6 years agoPost 7434
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

England is where the English language originates, Oxford University is the top university in England, and their dictionary is widely regarded as being ''the foremost authority in English.''

My own paper copy of the Oxford dictionary also tells us that the word 'atheist' originates from the Greek word 'atheos'.
Your country, your university, your dictionary is the first authority on OUR language????

In case you have not noticed, we have our own universities and our own dictionaries. We are not the USA because of your country dusty. We are the USA in spite of your country. Yes, we do share the same language. But, since we have been independent from you for 235 years, you are now certainly the "last" authority on our language. Its over pal. Get over yourself.

We can manage our language on our own without you now. But, maybe, just maybe we can teach your thick headed skull a bit about new born babies not being atheists.

Nah, never mind.

We'll just continue on and have a good laughs over your interpretations of your silly little prudish oxford dictionary.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 09:39 PM  6 years agoPost 7435
Life_Nerd

rrVeteran

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

We yanks did a fine job of ferhoodling the English language.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 09:42 PM  6 years agoPost 7436
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

We yanks did a fine job of ferhoodling the English language.
git-r-done

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 09:51 PM  6 years agoPost 7437
Life_Nerd

rrVeteran

USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

LOL!!!! yep.

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 10:27 PM  6 years agoPost 7438
Dusty1000

rrApprentice

Glasgow, U.K.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Your country, your university, your dictionary is the first authority on OUR language????...blah blah blah
DEET DE DEET

How can you get everything so wrong, every single time you post?

Here's a geography lesson for you: Glasgow is in Scotland.

England is not my country, so I have nothing to do with your rant against the English. But, you obviously have a lot of pent up anger and frustration, so you might as well let it all out.

Like it or not, you do speak English. That is what the language is called.

Being the foremost authority on the English language, the Oxford English dictionary is the best selling English dictionary in the world.

While babies being atheists might not fit in with your preconceived ideas, there comes a time when you have to try to let logic and reason see through your emotions. It'll be better for you in the long run, and should help to cut down on your frustration and anger. So, take a deep breath, then try to tell us which part of this definition you do not understand.

atheist
a person who does not believe in the existence of God or gods

http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/atheist

Dusty

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-02-2011 11:01 PM  6 years agoPost 7439
Dennis (RIP)

rrApprentice

Oregon

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

How can you get everything so wrong, every single time you post?

Here's a geography lesson for you: Glasgow is in Scotland.
Well heck.

You could have fooled me. I thought it was at the UK Disney land. You know. The place where fantasy resides.

If its in Scotland, where the heck is that? Is that a muslim country? Never heard of it. Do you eat hot dogs, chips and drink beer. Do humans live there? Do you fart? Do you watch TV? Are you gay?

Like it or not, you do speak English. That is what the language is called.
No sh#t???

You wouldn't kid me, would you?

Come on dusty. You know we communicate, in a fashion. But, you know we don't speak the same language. Not even close.
Being the foremost authority on the English language, the Oxford English dictionary is the best selling English dictionary in the world.
Good, glad to hear it. You keep it. You read it. I'll buy something thats worthwhile reading. But, thanks anyway.

So, take a deep breath, then try to tell us which part of this definition you do not understand:

Atheist:
Impolite, thickheaded, kinda not to brite, thinks new born babies are atheists, reads the oxford dictionary, lives in fantasy land, intellectually challenged, intellectually dishonest, spin words to redefine the same, etc, etc, etc.

Source; Dennis's RedNeck American dictionary of git-r-done type crapola.

What the heck. If you want to spin words, so can I.

Ain't it great?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
08-03-2011 02:57 AM  6 years agoPost 7440
Thomas L Erb

rrKey Veteran

Alliance ohio

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Thomas, must you try to belittle others, every time you post?
Not so dusty just you mostly . Tis for tat ( do you understand that English?

Scoyle GOOD ONE!!!!
If you want to add ''ism'', it would be ''ferhoodlism'', not ''ferhoodledism'', but don't go ferhoodling yourself over it.
First off it is my created ism and I will choose the proper spelling! Bad form ,bad form sir!

Secondly mr dodge reply to my post . What part of you can't deny OR disbelieve unless you have awareness did you miss? Do I need to look this up in the dictionary ?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR
WATCH
 711 pages [ <<    <     371     ( 372 )     373     NEXT    >> ] 314755 views TOPIC CLOSED
HelicopterOff Topics News & Politics › God Did Create Mankind.
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 30  Topic Subscribe

Monday, January 22 - 2:26 pm - Copyright © 2000-2017 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online