RunRyder RC
 4  Topic Subscribe
WATCH
 1 page 572 views
HelicopterOff Topics News & Politics › PREAMBLE TO THE CONSTITUTION
09-01-2009 03:46 PM  8 years agoPost 1
Kramer

rrApprentice

LaPorte,In.

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

The following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Kaye from GA. This guy should run for President one day
But it was written in 1993 by Lewis Napper

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren, hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights"

ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but no one is guaranteeing anything.

ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone -- not just you! You may leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc; but the world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.

ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.

ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes ...

ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in public health care.

ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.

ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of leisure.

ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational training laid before you to make yourself useful. (AMEN!)

ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.

ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you are from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came from! (Lastly....)

ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet, you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!

http://www.facebook.com/groups/1029857 http://northern-indiana-modelers-association.synthasite.com/

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 01:56 PM  8 years agoPost 2
hockeysew

rrApprentice

Co-USA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Unfortunatly it would never fly--It makes too much sense.

Liberals are like a "Slinky", useless but entertaining when pushed down stairs....

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 02:39 PM  8 years agoPost 3
OzarkCopterBum

rrApprentice

Arkansas Ozarks

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

It wasn't written by Mitchell Kaye either...

Just another stupid email forward by stupid habitual liars. I guess the original author wasn't quite important enough so they lied and attributed it to someone slightly more important, as if that makes a difference.

Repo man's got all day and all night! Lets go get a drink!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 02:44 PM  8 years agoPost 4
BJames111

rrElite Veteran

San Diego, California

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 02:51 PM  8 years agoPost 5
OzarkCopterBum

rrApprentice

Arkansas Ozarks

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Bjames don't show them Snopes again!!

Repo man's got all day and all night! Lets go get a drink!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 04:14 PM  8 years agoPost 6
debogus

rrApprentice

Beauklahoma,peoples republic of mexifornia,USSA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

DUH

"But it was written in 1993 by Lewis Napper" ?
Did you read the whole post or do you just go into immediate attack mode ?
Snopes? Who the F'ks cares it says no right in first few sentenses.

What happened ,the whole common sense thing just baffeled your senses?

Who cares who wrote it ,it should be the law of the land

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 06:54 PM  8 years agoPost 7
A. Bundy

rrElite Veteran

Aurora,IL. 30W/SW of Chicago

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

What articles don't you agree with OCB?

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 08:10 PM  8 years agoPost 8
OzarkCopterBum

rrApprentice

Arkansas Ozarks

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

What articles don't you agree with OCB?
The part where it was attributed to the wrong author. The actual authors name was only edited in today after Bjames and I mentioned it was wrong.

And specifically the last line, "In God We Trust" appears nowhere in the original Constitution and didn't really appear on ANY US documents until 1956.

So in effect, the author is attempting to rewrite history himself, while condemning everyone that doesn't agree with him for rewriting history. It also conflicts with #2 as he is clearly offended that some people believe that God and government don't mix well. What religion we choose and in what deity we choose to trust is none of the governments business.

Plus an overall reading shows it to be pretty self centered and mean spirited and its easy to see why the original author never got elected to anything, that's probably why its falsely attributed to someone that did.

Repo man's got all day and all night! Lets go get a drink!

PM  EMAIL  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 09:48 PM  8 years agoPost 9
RonHill

rrVeteran

FLL, FL

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

OzarkCopterBum

And specifically the last line, "In God We Trust" appears nowhere in the original Constitution and didn't really appear on ANY US documents until 1956.
Maybe the words, "In God we Trust" does not appear on the Constitution

BUT God is mentioned in:
The Declaration:
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness....

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.
So while you may claim that the Constitution does not have it, the Declaration DOES.

Also, several other documents do mention God...

Mayflower compact:
In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are underwritten, the Loyal Subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord, King James, by the Grace of God, of England, France and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, e&. Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the northern parts of Virginia; do by these presents, solemnly and mutually in the Presence of God and one of another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick....
And "In God We Trust” is in the U.S. National Anthem which was WRITTEN IN 1814.

In God We Trust and first applied to U.S. coins in 1864. On July 11, 1955, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed Public Law 140 making it mandatory that all coinage and paper currency display the motto.

Thomas Jefferson wrote, "The God who gave us life gave us liberty at the same time" and asked "Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are of God?"

So while you can correctly claim that it is not in the Constitution, you CANNOT claim it is not part of the history of the US.

BTW, I am not religious, I just see facts.

also, while you want to claim the Constitution does not say anything about God, it sure does say something about the right to bear arms. Yet you seem to have a problem with those words.

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
09-02-2009 11:02 PM  8 years agoPost 10
debogus

rrApprentice

Beauklahoma,peoples republic of mexifornia,USSA

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

Said it right there but NOOOooooo,

The following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Kaye from GA. This guy should run for President one day
But it was written in 1993 by Lewis Napper

So he edited it ,end of discussion
Why do you libs always go into coronary mode on the slightest little thing?
OH you used the wrong spelling , oh you used the wrong punctuation.
Attack mode and don't debate any facts just Wha wha wha.

So in the posted article what do you disagree with?
Inquiring minds would like to know .

PM  EMAIL  Attn:RR  Quote
09-03-2009 07:31 AM  8 years agoPost 11
philip 01

rrElite Veteran

ft worth

My Posts: All  Forum  Topic

it doesn't matter who wrote it.

the content is true and correct.

PM  EMAIL  HOMEPAGE  GALLERY  Attn:RR  Quote
WATCH
 1 page 572 views
HelicopterOff Topics News & Politics › PREAMBLE TO THE CONSTITUTION
 Print TOPIC  Make Suggestion 

 4  Topic Subscribe

Monday, December 18 - 8:15 pm - Copyright © 2000-2017 RunRyder   EMAILEnable Cookies

Login Here
 New Subscriptions 
 Buddies Online