Steve Campbell Elite Veteran Location: Baton Rouge, LA
My Posts This: Topic Forum | steve9534,
First, I am NOT affiliated in any way with MA, other than having owned several of their machines (a pair of STs at present).
I hear you regarding X-Cell complexity, and agree to a point. But I would like to point out that, for the most part, the basic design was trouble-free for many years; right up to the time that the flip-flop craze went full bore and people began cramming monster engines in their machines. Ray Hostetler flies an X-Cell from the initial production run in 1986 that still has the original tail gears.
Guys used to fly helicopters with standard servos, for years, with absolutely no drama. Now, we see coreless and digital servos twice as stout, failing in months. What changed? Flying style.
My point is this; wanting to do the wild and exteme stuff is fine, if that's what blows your skirt up. But don't be surprised when you break things doing it.
I know, Steve; this isn't what you're saying. I'm setting up the number two Sport Trainer as we speak. Fortunately, I enjoy detail work, so the tedious chore of zeroing out and leveling all those bell cranks, etc., is not aggravating to me. It generally takes more effort and a bit longer to get there, but once right, nothing flies better, IMO. And you know what? I had a feeling that my tail box wasn't right. It SEEMED okay after I finished doing it, but something just didn't feel right. So I took it to Birmingham with me and let John Garst and Dave Harkey look at it. They both agreed the mesh was a bit off, and John spent over an hour re-doing it, and showing me where I had missed something. THAT is what field reps are all about; John is a good one. Thanks, dude.
Yeah, X-Cells are more involved than other brands. Definitely not for the "plug'n'play" crowd.
But I'll let you in on a secret; when I either tire of these X-Cells, or tear them up beyond a feasible re-build, I plan to get a Freya...
Steve |