JohnLund rrAdvertiser Location: Corpus Christi, TX
My Posts This: Topic Forum | | Quote |
| Thanks John,
People just didn't seem to get it but I'm glad you reinforced my point EXACTLY.
Quote --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
refered to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 "Sec. 501 TAX ON INDIVIDUALS WITHOUT ACCEPTABLE HEALTH CARE COVERAGE", --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The above is an existing piece of legislation. It is not created in the bill you guys are all upset about, That was my point, all this does is point you at the existing laws, if jail is part of those laws, you should have bitched then rather than blame any law that references it. That has been my point all along, glad to see ya all caught up now....
|
And your point? The bill says if you don't pay the extra tax you go to jail, whether directly, or by proxy of referal to an existing piece of legislature, this bill points to that one for the punishments. Why are you so desperate when this isn't even your country? More of the nanny state mindset I guess, you seem to think that because you are dependent on your government that it's a good thing, and others should be dependent on theirs? Sorry, that's not how this country works. We do not want cradle to grave government dependence in our lives.
Ron's Heliproz South |