imnxtc
Veteran
Location: Dawson
My Posts This: Topic Forum | BM1
I suggest that if you find the mechanical control system of your K50 flies better then your the eCCPM system of your Raven, then I am sure it is all in the set-up or due to the use of some different equipment used between the two.
The predecessor to the Raven was the Falcon SEV2, which was exactly the same heli as the Raven V2. I had both set-up with the same servos, gyro, motor, muffler, governor, blades.
I found the Raven to have the edge. When setting-up for max precision of the control systems, there was much less interaction to mix-out with the Raven (almost none) for hands off, right-side up or inverted hover or for hard climbs (max collective) both right side-up or inverted.
Much more was required with the mCCPM system of the Hawk and Falcon or K50.
And the collective pop was a bit better on the Raven. P.S. Doubling up on the collective arm on the Falcon did help here, as did going to a fast and very high torque collective servo. This doubling of the collective arm makes it more rigid.
I bet after you were finished upgrading your K-50 to the head from the Raven etc, that the total cost was much more then that of just buying a Raven. |
