ki-gas Senior Heliman Location: All over Europe, mainly England
| | Quote |
| ever hear of Photoshop?
|
Yes, do you know how to use it? Lightening under exposed areas is relatively easy but darkening over exposed areas takes a lot more work – bang goes the profit margin.
As for the shot it is typical fullsize, flat and uninspiring and as dynamic as a tortoise on drugs.
Big Boy OZzz,
We are discussing and highlighting the pros and cons of aerial stills taken with a fullsize aircraft. I know this was not quite what the original post was enquiring about but Lunny seems to have a bent towards blowing the fullsize trumpet so I’m just enjoying myself by chucking him some fodder.
gjestico,
Absolutely spot on!! Careful, you’ll upset Lunny
aramsdell,
You dead right, I’ve been trying to tell him but he won’t listen. The fullsize for stills is virtually redundant if you want a shot that has ‘WOW’. If you want to create ‘MAPS’ then it great.
As you say, getting a shot like that is a doddle
| Quote |
| Heck at 50 feet you could do that with a pole.I also use a 60 foot pole cam.
|
Poles are not easy to use over water plus if you want to move 100’ left or right is a load of hassle.
| Quote |
| Tell me about it,I have never have seen such an argumentative group as the people on this forum.I state my opinion and people jump all over me.
|
You’re the argumentative one – read back!!!!!!
| Quote |
| Is it is wrong to have a different opinion that someone else?
|
Nope, that’s why I am replying to your posts. |