JA Allen
Senior Heliman
Location: NYC
My Posts This: Topic Forum | If the invoice was presented to Rob, as it is SHOWN above, and Rob replied "Fantastic". Then people, what was QWW supposed to think? Rob, what did you mean by "Fantastic" in that email? That is the question.
If Rob was sent a different invoice and promised some relief of charge on parts, then QWW broke the law.
Which one is it?
Be Realistic and not Idealistic.
There is one spot though, that Rob is correct. Most of this part invoice was commented by Irwin (in these confidential emails) as a gesture for free to continue a flight review, and Irwin/QWW did charge for those when they should not have.
The total when put into consideration should have just been blades, and not at the full QWW price, to continue the flight review in good standing. As I heard agreed to by both parties, the machine was even supposed to be handed on for christ sakes! What is going on?
Morally wrong? Yes. But as it looks, not law breaking. It still could be determined that specific CC authorization was not given.
Rob, I hope you come out of this ok. Just send the stuff back (sorry it will, as seen, be your dime again, which is not right as well) and get your money back. In the long run, it will be the best recourse. And it is proven Irwin said it was agreed. Then if no money, well...
Simple fact that can not be taken away, is that Rob did a fine, honest review, and Irwin flipped on him, then charged for these parts after fact, was that invoice actual costs? or an outline rigged to charge if things did not go the QWW way?
Interesting.
Avant Aurora, Vibe 90, Raptor SE&3D F3C/3D |
