AMA Expo 2010
HOME   rrTV-PHOTO   GALLERIES   MY GALLERY   HELP-FAQ
myHOME PM pmRR MEMBERS 382 ONLINE 62 EVENTS SEARCH REGISTER  START HERE
 
2 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2     NEXT    >> ]1422 viewsPOST REPLY
Fast Lad Performance . Ace Hobby . Thunder Power RC

.
.
Radio - Servo - Gyro - Gov - Batt > Regulator vs CC_BEC
 
 
BrunoB
Senior Heliman
Location: Quebec, Canada

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
For a lithium setup (receiver in a glow model) I get the feeling regulators (Arizona, Duralite...) are more popular than BECs. Besides the dual voltage, that I don't plan to use anyway, a BEC seems to have many advantages over a regulator (cheaper, lighter, uses less energy...)

Am I missing something?

Bruno
11-09-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
Tim Ashley
Heliman
Location: Saint Albans , West Virginia 25177

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
A123

I have been thinking about a 2 cell a123 @6.6 volt
Much less trouble than li-poly
http://www.thedunemaster.com/

Tim Ashley AMA # 470888,
11-09-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
helo_chris
Veteran
Location: goodlettsville, tn

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
I think it has more to do with thats just the way its been. Until recently few reasonably priced BECs were capable of delivering the current a high performance, 3D bird needs. Thats really been the only down side, if you go with a quality unit.

"There is a fine line between cutting edge and bleeding edge.."
11-10-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   HOMEPAGE   GALLERY
 
 
dkshema
rrMaster
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
A BEC is only a regulator by another name. BEC just sounds sexier.

-----

* Making the World a Better Place -- One Helicopter at a time! *

Dave
11-10-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
MickeyMoo
Senior Heliman
Location: Ohio

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Quote 
A BEC is only a regulator by another name. BEC just sounds sexier.

I thought a regulator would just burn off the extra voltage of a pack. A BEC is more efficient. According to Castle [url=http://www.castlecreations.com/products/cc_bec.html] a 6S (25volt) input can be used with their BEC I don't think a regulator could handle this voltage. Maybe some one can explain this better

I'm thinking of using my 3s lipo pack from my foamies to power my heli with a bec. I think the A123s are the future but for now they are expensive and I don't have a charger. They are also on the heavy side for foam planes if one wants to get dual usage
11-10-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
tadawson
Elite Veteran
Location: Lewisville, TX

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Nope . . . you are thinking linear vs. switching regulators, which are non-related terms to the concept of "BEC". A BEC is any type of device that drops voltage (regulated or just dropped . . ) to run the RX and servos from the main motor pack. What you can do with it depends on the type of regulator in the BEC.

Think of it this way . . . the "BEC" concept is the sales/marketing/packaging of voltage regulators for R/C . . .

- Tim
11-10-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE  
 
 
pwood
Key Veteran
Location: Dubai - UAE

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Hi guys

If i remember correctly, BEC was a term first used by the r/c car guys. The really old cars used a 4,8v rx battery and then Tamiya (i think they were first in a large commercial way) came up with a BEC speed controler (battery eliminated circuit) and the speed controler (old wiper type) had an output to power the rx from the 7,2v nicad battery.

It was the coolest thing....but you needed a 'special' BEC rx what could work on 7,2v.

I assume the rx had a 'volt drop system' inside, as the same 4,8v servos were used....

How things have changed in 20 years.

Regards
Paul
11-11-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
dkshema
rrMaster
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Yup, no matter HOW they do it, a BEC and a regulator do the same job. They simply provide a different voltage on their output than what is supplied on the input. And their job is to try to provide a somewhat constant voltage independent of load.

The "battery eliminator circuit" regulates the higher LiPo (or multiple Nicad/NiMh) supplied input voltage down to a voltage that won't blow up your radio components so that you can power your electronics off the same battery as the motor. That way you don't need a separate battery pack to run the electronics. It eliminates the flight pack battery. In most speed controls, the regulator produces a five volt output for the electronics. BUT -- since a linear regulator is cheap, requires only a couple of capacitors (maybe a couple resistors) to work, they are used to make the "BEC" circuit. There are two drawbacks to using a linear regulator, however. The first is that in most cases, the the typical "3-terminal, low dropout voltage, linear regulator" just doesn't handle large amounts of current UNLESS you mount it on a HUGE heat sink. The second drawback is that for the amount of space most speed control folks allocate to their BEC, the physical devices available can't handle more than an amp and a half (again, heat sinked very well).

A linear regulator is not a very efficient device. Think of it as nothing more than a resistor. If you pass current through a resistor, you develop a voltage across it (Mr. Ohm says that the voltage that is developed across a resistor is equal to the amount of current in amps multiplied by the resistance in ohms -- E=I*R). With a bit more handwaving, the POWER dissipated by that resistor is equal to the current going THROUGH the resistor, multiplied by the voltage developed across it -- P = V * I).

Looking at a typical 5 volt, 3 amp, three terminal low dropout voltage linear regulator hooked up to a 3-cell LiPo (that at full charge is about 12.3 volts) the regulator has 12.3 - 5 volts "dropped" across it, 7.3 volts in all with a fully charged LiPo. Assume that you're averaging an amp of current while flying that all digital servo'd Trex. 7.3 volts multiplied by that 1 amp means the regulator has to dump 7.3 watts of power on average without smoking. If you were to look at the data sheet for that little regulator device, you will find that you need a pretty darn good sized hunk of finned aluminum (or several square inches of copper clad circuit card material to dissipate that heat. Then, try to do that on a hot day in mid-summer, with the speed control tucked away inside a canopy where there is not much air flow. The regulator has a built-in thermal protection circuit. If it gets too hot (the internal junction temperature is usually spec'ed at 150 degrees C), it shuts down till things cool off. Then it wakes up, and if it gets too hot, shuts down again. Dissipating 7 watts of energy, it takes very little time for a poorly cooled linear regulator to shut down from overtemperature operation.

The large amount of voltage "dropped" across the linear regulator is why the "BEC" on most speed controls is limited to three cell LiPo operation. Add a fourth cell, the input voltage goes up to about 16 volts, and with an output voltage of 5 volts, the regulator now has 11 volts across its input/output terminals, and at that average one amp load, it now has to dissipate 11 watts. You could use it to brand cattle with at that point.

A linear regulator is very inefficient. Inefficiency in this case shows up as lots of HEAT.

-----

The solution to the heat problem is to use a "switching regulator". These are neat, in that they use a little bit of power from the battery to run, but can be made upwards of 90 percent efficient. The switching regulator uses some cool properties of transformers to do its thing. In its simplest form the input voltage from the LiPo is hooked to one end of an coil (inductor) -- the "primary" winding of a transformer. The other end of the coil is hooked to a transistor that is switched on and off at a very high frequency. The secondary winding of the transformer (a second coil or inductor that is wound around the same "core" that the primary was wound on) outputs a different voltage than is seen on the input side. The output voltage is determined by the ratio of the number of turns of wire that make up the primary winding, and the number of turns of wire that make up the secondary winding.

In ideal terms, if you had a transformer with one turn of wire making up its primary winding, and five turns of wire making up its secondary, the output voltage would be five times the input voltage.

And if you had 5 turns of wire on the primary, and one turn of wire on the secondary, the output voltage would be 1/5 that of the input voltage.

Transformers only work with alternating current -- that's why the switching regulator has to "chop" (switch on and off) the incoming battery voltage to work.

-----

Ever wonder how older cars (before electronic ignition) got that 15,000 volts to fire your spark plug from that the 12v power system in the car? The "ignition coil" is nothing more than a transformer with a few turns of wire on the input, and a LOT of turns of wire on the output. Coils of wire have a neat property -- if you run current through them, they don't like to see that current suddenly stop flowing. Hook one end of your igntion coil to the 12V battery, and use a switch to open and close the circuit to ground (the "points" in that car's ignition system). As long as current is flowing through the primary, you really don't see any voltage on the secondary winding (the spark side). BUT -- open that switch (distributor cam opens the points) and the transformer becomes VERY unhappy. It tries to maintain the current by momentarily jacking up the voltage.

The voltage across an inductor is equal to the size (inductance) of the coil mulitplied by a number that tells you how fast the current changes (amount of current divided by length of time). If the current stops instantly, time goes to zero, and if you remember anything from math, big numbers divided by very small numbers (very close to zero) become REALLY REALLY big numbers.

Open that switch, the voltage on the primary side of the ignition coil skyrockets momentarily. The huge number of secondary turns of wire increases THAT voltage spike several thousand times and voila -- the spark plug gets a 15,000 volt jolt. Not a lot of current, but a lot of voltage.

The switching regulator uses those principles of transformers to do its thing -- the fact that inductors don't like to see their current suddenly stop, and the fact that you can make different voltages on the output than you have on the input simply by playing with how many turns of wire you have.

-----

The switching regulator is neat in that you can play with the frequency at which you switch the voltage, the magnetics design (transformer), the way you switch the voltage, and with some planning, you can limit the losses and get a highly efficient, SMALL, lightweight regulator that has a wide input voltage range, a very well regulated output voltage, and runs cool as a cucumber.

Since you can put more than one secondary winding on a transformer (and can play games with how you wind the secondary) you can generate a whole bunch of different voltages on the output with a single input voltage.

That would allow you to make a switching regulator with a 5 volt output for your receiver and gyro, for example, and a 6 (or other voltage) output for your servos. Pretty cool. Play your cards right, you could also generate that 100 volts needed to make your electroluminescent glow-wires work for night flying. All off your single battery.

All that neat stuff comes at a cost -- size, weight, and $$$.

-----

Linear regulators are CHEAP, very inefficient, but work pretty well if you heat sink them properly, or limit the amount of current you pass through them. The heat sink can be HUGE.

Switching regulators are more expensive, but can run circles around the linear regulator performance-wise. They have their own problems, though -- they can generate unwanted RF noise, may require a minimum load to maintain (regulate) the output voltage properly, and if something goes wrong in the input voltage switching circuit, they die suddenly and catastrophically.

----

In the end, both approaches do nothing more than create a different voltage on their output than you give them on their input. And both can be used to "eliminate" the second battery pack that would be needed to run your electronics. They REGULATE voltages, and they ELIMINATE that second battery pack.

-----

* Making the World a Better Place -- One Helicopter at a time! *

Dave
11-11-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
Al Austria
Key Veteran
Location: Gainesville, FL

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Very informative post! Thanks!

Century Helicopters
~Allan Austria
11-11-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   HOMEPAGE   GALLERY
 
 
MickeyMoo
Senior Heliman
Location: Ohio

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
dkshema...

Great post, very educational.

It would seem that you have more knowledge on this subjuct than you revealed in you previous post

I think these new switching regulators are great compared to the old linear type (now that I know the difference . I had one of the old type that got so hot you couldn't hold it. Never trusted it

How do I compare capacities of my lipo packs to my nicad packs. Could I use the formula volts x amps = watts ?

For example a 3s lipo pack average of 11 volts x capacity 1300mah = 14,300 watts. Then divide the 14,300 by 5.3 volts (average volts of a 4 cell pack) would give me the equivilent capacity of ~2700mah pack. Figure 90% efficency and my 1300 3s lipo is about the equivilent of about a 2400 4 cell nicad\nimh pack? Does this make sence?
11-11-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
dkshema
rrMaster
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Quote 
How do I compare capacities of my lipo packs to my nicad packs.

Look at the mah rating of each pack. A 1500 mah pack is a 1500 mah pack whether it's made of nicads, NiMh, LiPo, or some other exotic material. The amp-hour rating tells you how much energy the pack can deliver, going from what is considered "fully charged" to "fully discharged".

1500 mah is 1500 mah, and is independent of where it comes from, or what kind of battery delivers it. The amp-hour rating of a battery is independent of chemistry type or construction.

In your example of a 3S, 1300 mah LiPo, it can deliver a total of 1300 mah of energy before it needs to be recharged. You can't use magic math to turn that 1300 mah pack into a 2700 mah pack. NO matter what you do downstream of the terminals (voltage regulator to go to 5 volts, for example, the battery itself is still a nominal 11.1 volts and it is still delivering some amount of current. If you suck current out of that 1300 mah, 11.1 volt pack at 1.3 amps (1300 ma), it will need to be recharged after an hour. If you suck current out at the rate of 2.6 amps, it will need to be recharged after 30 minutes. If you suck current out at the rate of 130 ma, it will go for ten hours before needing to be recharged.

The real difference between the chemistries is at what RATE they can deliver the energy to the load without overheating or without a substantial internal cell voltage loss due to the cell's internal impedance.

Internal impedance. Batteries are not ideal voltage sources. An ideal voltage source has zero resistance and can supply infinite current. Since we live in the real world, the construction of the cell and the materials used (along with impurities) add a small amount of resistance to the battery construction. The key is to manufacture a cell with the lowest possible internal resistance. This allows you to dump high currents out of the battery without it getting hot, and without the actual terminal voltage drooping below what it should be.

Your 1300 mah 3S LiPo IS a 1300 mah pack.

If you have a 1300 mah LiPo pack, and a 1300 mah nicad pack (voltage does NOT enter the equation here), and put a 1.3 amp load on EACH pack, both will need to be recharged after one hour.

Look at it this way, a 20 gallon fuel tank is a 20 gallon fuel tank, whether it's made of plastic, galvanized zinc, titanium, or sheepskin. All can deliver fuel at different flow rates, but when you've sucked 20 gallons out of them, they're ALL empty. The mah rating of batteries only tells you how big the tank is.

-----

* Making the World a Better Place -- One Helicopter at a time! *

Dave
11-11-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
MrMel
rrProfessor
Location: Lidingo, Sweden (GMT+1)

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
For a constant amp load, yes, but usually when volt goes up ampdraw goes down unless load raises accordingly.

And Lipo 3s has higher avg volt then the NiMh/NiCd compared.
11-11-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
dkshema
rrMaster
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
But, pack voltage, cell voltage, amp load have nothing to do with the capacity of the pack.

A 2000 mah capacity means the pack can deliver up 2000 mah of energy before it's considered fully discharged.

Whether it takes you all day to drain 2000 mah of energy out of the pack, or you do it in 30 seconds, when 2000 mah of energy have been taken out, it's time to recharge.

Back to the gas tank analogy. I can poke a hole in the tank using an ice pick, or I can open up a ten-inch diameter hole in it. No matter what the size of the hole, when those 20 gallons have passed through it, it's empty. I doesn't matter if the tank is full of 100 octane avgas, 85 octane regular, diesel, alcohol, or soybean oil (different "voltage" fuel", when 20 gallons has gone out of the 20 gallon tank, it's done.

When you drive your car, you use up the fuel at varying highway speeds, varying motor RPMs, and varying fuel consumption rates. But whether you drive to average 400 miles per gallon of fuel, or 1 mile per gallon of fuel, the tank only holds 20 gallons, and when you go through that 20 gallons, you're walking.

Yes, LiPo cells are typically 3.7 volts while Nicads are typically 1.2 volts. That has NOTHING to do with how much current they can supply before they are fully discharged. Lipos are considered to be discharged when they reach a terminal voltage of 3.0 volts under load. Nicads are considered discharged when they reach 1.0 volts under load. The fact they start at different voltages and end at different voltages has nothing whatsoever to do with how much juice they can supply while getting to that empty point.

Amp load can vary, but again, that has nothing to do with the CAPACITY of the cell. Discharge time (related to amp load) can vary. But when you've taken 1300 mah out of a 1300 mah pack, you're done.

In general the mah rating of a pack is conservative, and not all 1300 mah packs can only deliver 1300 mah before they're empty (due to variations in manufacturing processes and materials). The electric RC car folk make a big deal out of making up their battery packs using "balanced" or "matched" cells. In that case, they actually take a batch of, say, 1500 mah C-sized Nicads, and measure their actual capacity. Cells of similar capacity are put into packs. Why? Because if one of the six cells in that 1500 mah, 7.2 volt nicad pack has a capacity of only 1000 mah, then for all practical purposes, that 1500 mah pack will be dead when only 1000 mah of energy have been extracted from it. The lowest capacity cell in the mix determines the pack's actual mah capacity.

Don't fool yourself into thinking that unrelated parameters -- start voltage, end voltage, average current draw, maximum current draw, time of day, phase of the moon, etc., can change how much juice you can suck out of a battery.

As for "volt goes up as amp draw goes down" -- that's true ONLY if you maintain constant power dissipation (watts) in the load.

Take a one ohm resistor, and put 10 volts across it. Measure the current in the circuit. You'll measure 10 amps and dissipate 10 watts. Increase the voltage to 20 volts. Now measure the current. You'll measure 20 amps, and dissipate 20 watts. So much for the "as volts goes up, amps goes down story.

Go to a six volt system in your RC pack, you won't find an increase in run time out of a 1500 mah pack over a 4.8 volt system. Why, because the load does not remain constant. The extra voltage in the 6 volt system, according to your "volt goes up, ampdraw goes down" argument does not get you extra run time. It gets you extra speed, and extra torque out of the servos. That extra power comes from an increased amp draw to get those motors to run faster, and to get more holding torque.

-----

* Making the World a Better Place -- One Helicopter at a time! *

Dave
11-11-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
MickeyMoo
Senior Heliman
Location: Ohio

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Quote 
Go to a six volt system in your RC pack, you won't find an increase in run time out of a 1500 mah pack over a 4.8 volt system. Why, because the load does not remain constant. The extra voltage in the 6 volts system, according to your "volt goes up, ampdraw goes down" argument does not get you extra run time. It gets you extra speed, and extra torque out of the servos. That extra power comes from an increased amp draw to get those motors to run faster, and to get more holding torque.


I don't think I made it clear but I was wondering how the 2 packs would compare if they were going through a switching BEC like the one from CC. If I flew one 10 minute flight on my Raptor, the electronics on the heli would require X amount of power (watts) from my battery pack. This power is the product of both the voltage and amperage. However with the BEC the voltage remains constant while the amperage varies with the demand of the electronics. If a switching regulator is even slightly efficient the "tank of the higher voltage pack should be less empty than the "tank" of a lower voltage pack of similar capacity and other variables like internal impedance for the same flight, correct

If this is not the case then for a given flight my heli would empty the "tank" of a 3s lipo the same amount as a 5s lipo pack of similar capacity and a switching regulator would not be very efficient. Were is the extra voltage going if the Bec is not converting it to heat?

Again I'm talking about packs with different voltages connected to a switching BEC performing the same amount of work. If one can determine the efficiency of the BEC is there a way to compare the power of the two packs?

Quote 
I doesn't matter if the tank is full of 100 octane avgas, 85 octane regular, diesel, alcohol, or soybean oil (different "voltage" fuel", when 20 gallons has gone out of the 20 gallon tank, it's done.


Yes but each fuel has a different ability to perform work given the same engine. Lets say you have to drive 100 miles and your engine is some what efficient. To do this your car will burn fuel, but it will burn less 100 octane fuel than 85 octane to cover the same 100 miles. Is the higher voltage pack connected to a switching BEC similar to the 100 octane fuel? It is able to perform more work than a lower voltage pack?
11-12-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
MrMel
rrProfessor
Location: Lidingo, Sweden (GMT+1)

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
DskHema,


We almost double the runtime by putting a Lipo in a TX vs NiMh...
So your 1500mah gastank will last totally different length (5hour if its a nimh and 9+ hours if its a lipo)


True that a servo will generally pull more, but also, Raising the Volt will raise the speed (draw more current), and raise the torque (draw less current if you dont up the load like putting on new blades),

So, Raise the torque will lower the avg current pull, so what we end up with in the end must be tested and cant be taken out of thin air.
It will change depending on setup and heli and so on..
11-12-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
dkshema
rrMaster
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Increasing holding torque decreases current requirements on the flight pack battery? Are those magic servos, by chance? That would suggest that to get better holding torque, we need to switch power to the servos OFF when they find their commanded position.

Doubling run times in your transmitter going from NiMh to LiPo. What are your starting voltages for each type of pack, what are the end voltages you're using to decide when the packs are empty. Are you comparing apples to apples? Is your LiPo powered transmitter using any kind of regulator, or are you directly connecting the LiPo to the existing battery plug on the TX? What TX, by the way?

This should be easy -- have you measured the current supplied by the battery packs when the TX is operating. A transmitter should place a fairly constant load on the battery.

-----

* Making the World a Better Place -- One Helicopter at a time! *

Dave
11-12-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
MrMel
rrProfessor
Location: Lidingo, Sweden (GMT+1)

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Hook up a eagletree on a machine runnning one servo and then change servos to same spec but stronger and see the results.

Its same effect that you will get if you take your electric heli and put on shorter blades.


For the TX battery runtime, it have been discussed forth and back all over the net, even the Flightpower TX-battery Ad has that as key benefit... (longer runtime)


here is one test among many.
http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/show...dualsky+TX+pack
11-12-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
dkshema
rrMaster
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Experiment in progress.

Last night on the way home from work, I stopped by the LHS and bought a 3S1P, 11.1 volt, 1250 mah LiPo. I made up a cable to allow me to plug the LiPo into one of my JR 8103 transmitters while allowing me to monitor the discharge current using my digital voltmeter.

After hooking everything up and giving the LiPo an initial charge, I measured the transmitter operating current at approximately 215 ma, with initial voltage indicated on the 8103 front panel of 12.6 volts. not bad, considering that the JR 8103 manual states that the transmitter operating current is 200 ma.

I ran this initial setup for about an hour, then disconnected the battery and recharged it. No surprise here, I put back about 200 mah worth of energy. At this point, the laws of physics still seem to be intact here in Iowa.

The stock battery for the 8103 is a 600 mah, 9.6V nominal nicad. I charged it using my Accucycle Elite charger while I was running the LiPo for that hour.

Next part of the experiment. Hook up the fully charged stock nicad pack, turn things on, sit back and watch TV while keeping an eye on the transmitter and battery.

The measured discharge current was 200 ma, +/- 10 ma throughout the entire discharge cycle. The initial battery voltage as indicated on the 8103 front panel was 11.0 volts. Two hours and 30 minutes after starting the experiment, the battery voltage had dropped to 9.0 volts, the point at which the 8103 declares "game over" and starts sounding its low battery alarm. A quick bit of math shows that JR calls a nicad pack discharged when it reaches 1.125 volts per cell. If you read the industry literature, you'll see that the manufacturers state that a nicad is fully discharged when it reaches a terminal voltage of between 1 and 1.1 volts (the number varies depending upon what data sheet you read). At the 1.125 volt threshold that JR uses, they throw in a little margin and shut down the TX on the safe side of things. The alarm goes off before the battery reaches the really sharp "knee" of the discharge curve where voltage drops nearly instantaneously to zero.

At this point, it looks like the 600 mah nicad in my 8103 is healthy, and after sucking 500 mah of energy out of it, the transmitter indicated it was time to recharge. Had the JR radio waited until the pack reached a voltage of between 8 and 8.8 volts (the 1 - 1.1 volts per cell number that's generally accepted as fully discharged), the measured capacity of the stock 600 mah battery would indeed reach at least its rated 600 mah capacity. The low-voltage alarm looks to be set to go off when the nicad has about 20% of its charge left. A healthy design margin.

At this point, as I stated earlier, the laws of physics seem to be intact here in Iowa. Tonight, I'll hook up the LiPo, and run the test all over again. I'd better get an early start, however, the predicted run time of the 1250 mah pack at 200 ma discharge is going to be at least six hours.

-----

* Making the World a Better Place -- One Helicopter at a time! *

Dave
11-13-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
MrMel
rrProfessor
Location: Lidingo, Sweden (GMT+1)

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Perhaps your right, I hooked up my 9303 and got 100-130 mah draw,
However my equipment isnt good enough for such small current draw.
Only way would for me to leave it on for about 22 hours + 12 for the stock NiMh.

Perhaps should drop Flightpower an email.
http://www.flightpower.co.uk/News/t...wsArticleID=403
11-13-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
MickeyMoo
Senior Heliman
Location: Ohio

My Posts This: Topic  Forum
Well...

I called Castle today to ask if there was a difference in run time between equal capacity packs of different voltages connected to their 10 amp BEC. The short answer is no. If you have a 1300 mah 2s, 3s or 4s pack you will not notice any difference in run time. It seemed like they were busy so I didn't press the tech for an explanation as to where the extra voltage goes. Basically if you are running a 5 volt system you can get by with a 2s and if you want a 6 volt setup go with a 3s. There is no benefit to extra voltage and the is a penalty when you get above about 15 volts or a 4s pack.

So dkshema had it right as far as extra voltage going through a switching BEC

I'm not sure about difference in run time with a transmitter between a lipo and nimh of equal capacity.

This is the pack I use https://www.unitedhobbies.com/UNITE...?idProduct=5280

Its great compared to nimh or nicads. I get over 9 hours with my 9c. It doesn't self discharge as fast as other battery types and I can quick charge at 1c if necessary. Should hold up well under the light load of the TX.
11-13-2007 Over year old.
PROFILE   PM   EMAIL   POSTS   BUDDY   IGNORE   GALLERY
 
 
2 pages [ <<    <    ( 1 )     2     NEXT    >> ]1422 viewsPOST REPLY
Mikado Modellhubschrauber . Futaba-RC . Boca Bearings

.
.
Radio - Servo - Gyro - Gov - Batt > Regulator vs CC_BEC
 Print TOPIC Advertisers 

Subscribe to This Topic

Tuesday, February 9 - 10:58 am - Copyright © 2000 - 2010 runryder.com | email | link to rr | START HERE | NF