Hoagie1
Veteran
Location: Redmond, WA
My Posts This: Topic Forum | The VoyagerE is limited to mild aerobatics -even with upgrades- due to it's small main rotor disk, weight (heavy and battery placement is too far away from disk), and power. I'd assume that with stock blades, you get more lift in the positive pitch range, but less negative pitch performance, meaning, you'll probably be able to do some mild aerobaticks, but not cut grass while hovering inverted.
Lucky for me, I'm still learning- I can't even do nose in yet- so the Voyager will do fine for me due to its stabilitiy and crash worthyness. It's quite tough and cheap to fix, but as they say, it's no Logo.
- Andy
My voyagers are configured as followed:
Voyager1:
Motor: C40-12s + 17 tooth pinion
ESC: Kontronk 40-6-12
UBEC: Azarr www.ecubedrc.com 11/13
Gyro: Futaba GY 401
Receiver: Futaba R148DF
Servos: Futaba S3001 cyclic, Futaba digital S9253
Battery: 10 cell 2600mAh\3000mAh NiMHr
Other: default blades, precision products tail pitch slider, PEK no 0delta
headspeed about 1700
Crashes: 1
Voyager2:
Motor: B40-8L + 16 tooth pinion
ESC: Kontronik 40-6-12
UBEC: Azarr www.ecubedrc.com 11/13
Gyro: Futaba GY 401
Receiver: Futaba R148DF
Servos: S9253 tail and HS-85 for cyclic
Battery: 10 cell 2600mAh\3000mAh NiMH
Other: full PEK, MS CD main blades, Mr Carbon CF frame, Carbon boom, precision products tail pitch slider, CNC AL motor mount
15tooth=1510 RPM, 17tooth about 1700-1800rpm
Crashes: 2 |
