TurboStew Senior Heliman Location: Ft Collins, CO
My Posts This: Topic Forum | When are radio manufactures going to put a curve fit function for servo outputs so you can get rid of geometry (like ECCPM) non-linearities and whatnot? My 9Z is a joke.
I want a radio programable by asigning equations to variables. For example:
Curve1X = 0.0, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 1.0
Curve1Y = 0.0, 0.25, 0.4, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0
Servo1 = JoyStick1 - 0.5 + Trim1*0.1*(1.0-JoyStick1)
Servo2 = ArcSin(JoyStick2 / 2.0) *2.0 + Trim2*0.1
Servo3 = Curve1(JoyStick3) + Trim3*0.1
Servo4 = Limit(1.0-Servo3+Knob1*0.1, -1.0, 1.0)
CurveX is the input points for a curve and CurveY is the output points. Servo1 is for the throttle with trim only affecting bottom end, Servo2 is elevator with arc correction, Servo3 is a curve applied to JoyStick3 and post trim. Servo4 is a reversed output of Servo3 with a aux rotory knob for trim and limited output. You could get as crazy as you wanted here! I think this would be sweet. There needs to be an "engineers" radio out there. I keep thinking of programming a little interpreter engine for a TI 2812 DSP. A terminal emulator app on a PDA and voila, a real programmable radio! Maybe I will gut an old Airtronics Stylus and put my own board in it. If we only had the crack on the Futaba 1024Z PCM protocol!

8.5 pound 90 birds Rock! |